Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Topped or Breach; is this the new "what is, is" question?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Tim4319 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-02-06 11:49 PM
Original message
Topped or Breach; is this the new "what is, is" question?
I've heard a few T.V. talk shows today, and I guess the talking points memos have been faxed out. According to them, when the president was discussing the levees, prior to the storm hitting. According to the defenders of Bush -- when he stated, something to the effect, no one anticipated a breach in the levees -- the defenders made it a point to say that there is a difference in topped and breach. Topped meaning the water flowed over the levees, while breach means break. What's the difference?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Rabrrrrrr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-02-06 11:56 PM
Response to Original message
1. Well, of course there is a physical difference
Edited on Thu Mar-02-06 11:56 PM by Rabrrrrrr
It's the difference between whether they thought that water would only flow over them, but stop flowing as soon as the water level went down, and in which pumping could be started immediately, even while the water was flowing; or if the levees were going to actually break, letting in water until the water level outside the levee went WAY down, below the level of the breach, requiring a breach fix before they could start pumping water out.

That said, though, I'm sure they are lying, and that they were not making this distinction in their conversations, and that they were thinking "breach". They are lying, as they always do, trying to blame someone else, like they always do, for their own failure to respond/react.

That's the theme for this administration "The No Response Then Blame Someone Else Years"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tim4319 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-03-06 12:03 AM
Response to Reply #1
5. My biggest problem is,
Bush said he had no idea that the levees would breach, when "Brownie" specifically told him how big of a concern they are. Plus, Bush didn't even ask one single question!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stephanie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-02-06 11:57 PM
Response to Original message
2. the levees WERE breached
so what's their point?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tim4319 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-03-06 12:00 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. They are so worried about keeping the idiot in his bubble!
They could care less about what the difference is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kenny blankenship Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-02-06 11:58 PM
Response to Original message
3. It's a difference without much distinction
Edited on Thu Mar-02-06 11:59 PM by kenny blankenship
topped or breached you got water where water's not supposed to be in the first place, and in the second place, if the levees are topped they are almost certainly going to be breached as well. Before the water recedes you will find that the walls are undercut or cracked open.
Give Pres. Ratfuck no quarter. He deserves no pity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
speedoo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-03-06 12:04 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. Exactly right, Kenny.
I'm no engineer, but it seems to me that levee breaches almost always have to be preceeded by topping. The topping allows water to flow over the levee which causes erosion of the levee earth support. After there is enough erosion, the levee fails structurally (breaches).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 03:00 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC