Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Is the era of big government over???

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Nutmegger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-03-06 02:19 PM
Original message
Is the era of big government over???
Edited on Fri Mar-03-06 02:34 PM by Nutmegger
As many of you know, Clinton made this statement.

I really like the thought of "big government"....

http://www.cnn.com/US/9601/budget/01-27/clinton_radio/

You think it's over? Is "big government" something that can be obtained as it was in the past?

On edit: I'm talking about the big government that benefits the people not the one we're living under today. Particularly strong, public social programs and involvement in the markets.

From Wiki:
Big government is a pejorative term generally used by political conservatives or advocates of laissez-faire to describe the government of their country as excessively large or inefficient, or as inappropriately involved in certain areas of public policy.

Commentators who use the term are typically concerned about government delivery of public-support programs, and government involvement in the formulation and implementation of laws and policies concerning civil rights, social justice and social welfare.

On the other hand, such commentators are often supportive of capital punishment, stronger executive powers for government, a larger criminal justice system (particularly in terms of police and prisons), and a powerful military.

Some populist commentators combine criticism of "big government" with criticism of "big business," casting them as an alliance against the public. Others include "big labor," although this connection would be somewhat contrived in many countries, such as the United States, where organized labor often has distinctly populist goals.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_government
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Sammy Pepys Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-03-06 02:21 PM
Response to Original message
1. What do you mean exactly?
That you like "the thought of big government?"

Just looking for clarification...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nutmegger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-03-06 02:24 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Social programs mainly
What else could mean "big government"??? I don't want my government telling me what to do.

Sorry for the confusion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BurgherHoldtheLies Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-03-06 02:24 PM
Response to Original message
2. This admin. has spent the most /created the most intrusive gov't EVER
That's my definition of BIG government and we're living it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LisaLynne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-03-06 02:26 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. I agree.
The "anti-big government" rhetoric is really just another one of the Repug lies. They LOVE big government. They just don't want the government to help anybody. They just want people bombed, locked up, and spied on. But, that takes a LOT of government!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nutmegger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-03-06 02:26 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. Well that's true
Okay, this of an example of big government for the worse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueEyedSon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-03-06 02:25 PM
Response to Original message
4. Yes, it has been replaced by the era af HUGE, PERVASIVE government.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BurgherHoldtheLies Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-03-06 02:28 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. Well said!
:toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueEyedSon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-03-06 02:31 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. And did I mention "outsourced" and "privatized"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueEyedSon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-03-06 02:51 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. I forgot "secretive", "spying" and "theocratic"!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Just Me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-03-06 02:38 PM
Response to Reply #4
12. Agreed. We are living in the worst kind of "big government".
;(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-03-06 02:28 PM
Response to Original message
7. Define big government.
If you mean public spending on the poor, disabled, elderly, and such, then it definitely is in decline. If you mean in actual terms, the answer is no. We have become the world's largest military state with no slowdown in the horizon and public money being funneled into private hands is at an all time high. We are creating a massive security state, the world's biggest big brother, and spending like crazy while borrowing the money. Debt comes due in one form or another to somebody. No, we are forming the ultimate big government with no real benefits.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nite Owl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-03-06 02:28 PM
Response to Original message
8. Well I'd go back to Clinton's
idea of big government being over:

We will meet these challenges, not through big government. The era of big government is over, but we can't go back to a time when our citizens were just left to fend for themselves.

We will meet them by going forward as one America, by working together in our communities, our schools, our churches and synagogues, our workplaces across the entire spectrum of our civic life.

As we move forward with tomorrow's challenges, we also must take care of yesterday's unfinished business. First, we must balance the budget. In the 12 years before I took office the deficit skyrocketed and our national debt quadrupled.

I came to Washington determined to act, and we did. In the first three years of our administration -- thanks to the Deficit Reduction Act of 1993 -- we cut the deficit nearly in half. In fact, our budget would be in balance today were it not for the interest payments we have to make on the debt that accumulated in the 12 years before I took office.

http://www.cnn.com/US/9601/budget/01-27/clinton_radio/



We have big government now and during any repuke reign. They speak in the law of opposites, they are what they say liberals are, they are the spenders---just not on us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VelmaD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-03-06 02:30 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. I think I'll pass on the Clinton vision...
thanks all the same. I'm still embarassed to be a member of the same party as the man who pushed through "welfare reform". *sigh*
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BillZBubb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-03-06 02:47 PM
Response to Original message
13. Of course not.
Big government is here to stay. Society is complex. That necessitates a large government.

The problem is not the size of government per se, but how that government is used.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 12:31 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC