Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

St. Pete Times: If judges won't stand up to Bush, who will?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-05-06 10:01 AM
Original message
St. Pete Times: If judges won't stand up to Bush, who will?
Edited on Sun Mar-05-06 10:01 AM by FLDem5
http://www.sptimes.com/2006/03/05/Columns/If_judges_won_t_stand.shtml

By ROBYN E. BLUMNER, Times Perspective Columnist
Published March 5, 2006

Federal judges are shrugging their shoulders, just when they need to square them. With a feckless, partisan Congress refusing to police even the most blatant illegal and unconstitutional actions of the Bush administration, the courts are essential to setting our nation back on the right path.

<snip>
After an enlightened Supreme Court ruling in 2004 that said prisoners held at Guantanamo could challenge their status in court, the Defense Department stopped the flow of men into the facility and started diverting them to a more secretive prison in Afghanistan.

<snip>
The men can't be returned to China, where they would likely be tortured. And the Bush administration doesn't want to admit them into the United States, because that may give the Guantanamo detainees a firmer legal basis for getting into court and challenging the conditions there. So they are being held in limbo.

<snip>
After hearing a habeas petition of two of the Uighurs, U.S. District Judge James Robertson ruled in December that they were in fact being held illegally. But then he did something shocking. Robertson refused to provide a remedy, saying he lacked the authority to order the men's release. They had won, but they would wake up the next day and every morning for the foreseeable future with guards and shackles as companions.

...oh, what a tangled web we weave.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
acmavm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-05-06 10:02 AM
Response to Original message
1. We kemo sabe? Not me. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-05-06 10:04 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. oh, what a tangled web THEY weave...
better?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmavm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-05-06 10:09 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Yeah, lots. But it just doesn't flow as well, does it? Can we just say
this is what happens when a bunch of lying bloody fingered thieves make fools out of a vulnerable country still hurting from a truly horrific attack on New York City. And when our own party sold us out because they were cowards.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-05-06 10:18 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. what I find interesting in this article, though
is that they are having a heck of a time justifying their policies when people who are not of Arab descent are involved.

The can scream 9/11 at the top of their lungs, but these policies are made to look ridiculous when held up to parallel situations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmavm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-05-06 10:32 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. But that was the beauty of 911 for these guys. That's why I so believe
that it was LIHOP. It demonized the very peoples that they had been planning on attacking for so very very long. In fact, that's what almost pushes me over into the MIHOP camp.

Shock and Awe wasn't a new idea for these bastards. It had been off the drawing board and in the works for a long time. They just needed 'justification' for their actions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-05-06 07:46 PM
Response to Original message
6. kicking for the Oscar crowd
I thought this was some very interesting fallout.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 05:51 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC