Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

NSA Destroyed Evidence of Domestic Spying-By Jason Leopold

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-05-06 01:49 PM
Original message
NSA Destroyed Evidence of Domestic Spying-By Jason Leopold
NSA Destroyed Evidence of Domestic Spying
By Jason Leopold
t r u t h o u t | Report

Thursday 05 January 2006

The National Security Agency, the top-secret spy shop that has been secretly eavesdropping on Americans under a plan authorized by President Bush four years ago, destroyed the names of thousands of Americans and US companies it collected on its own volition following 9/11, because the agency feared it would be taken to task by lawmakers for conducting unlawful surveillance on United States citizens without authorization from a court, according to a little known report published in October 2001 and intelligence officials familiar with the NSA's operations.

NSA lawyers advised the agency to immediately destroy the names of thousands of American citizens and businesses it collected shortly after 9/11 in its quest to target terrorists in this country. NSA lawyers told the agency that the surveillance was illegal and that it could not share the data it collected with the CIA or other intelligence agencies.

The lawyers said the surveillance could result in numerous lawsuits from people identified in the surveillance reports, two former US officials told the Houston Chronicle in an October 27, 2001, report, and was illegal despite any terrorist threat that existed in the days following 9/11.

By law, the NSA cannot spy on a US citizen, an immigrant lawfully admitted to this country for permanent residence, or a US corporation. But, with the permission of a special court, it can target foreigners inside the United States, including diplomats.
http://www.truthout.org/docs_2006/010506I.shtml
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
fooj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-05-06 01:51 PM
Response to Original message
1. Destroying evidence isn't illegal in Shrub's world.
:cry:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
formercia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-05-06 01:52 PM
Response to Original message
2. Is this before or after they shared the info
with the White House?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
librechik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-05-06 01:52 PM
Response to Original message
3. Hot!
pass it around, please

No, they don't look guilty at all! :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-05-06 01:52 PM
Response to Original message
4. When?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ThomWV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-05-06 01:56 PM
Response to Original message
5. This Is Silly
It is absolute nonsense and anyone with a Whit of sense should be able to see thought it.

We do not know one single thing that goes on inside the NSA. We do not know how they spy, who they spy on, when they spy, what information it is they collect.

To now say that we know what they did with that information is ludicrous.

Back to the comics folks .....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EVDebs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-05-06 03:35 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. It's blanket spying ! Everybody's information is spied on
Just read James Bamford's Puzzle Palace and Body of Secrets. They use a 'vacuum cleaner' approach and just suck up every bit of information available, electronically E-Lint, and signals Sig-Int, and overheard or stolen, Hum-Int.

They then are supposed to weed out (with key-words etc.) the useless info, but, as seen with ChoicePoint and other database providers, the intel agencies sometimes get it wrong. Just in today's posts you see an author (Bush's Brain) and a 4 yr. old from Houston being put on the No Fly List. I'd love to hear the rationales on these but you can see that the 'weeding' process doesn't take chances. Much to the delight of the Daily Show when they get ahold of this.

This appears to be Bush's strategery on fighting the war on terror. Look incompetent and ineffective in order to lull the real terrorists into action...then we can pounce !
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EVDebs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-05-06 03:27 PM
Response to Original message
6. Everything was farkeled up, all for the lack of a warrant in every case !
Wouldn't it have been common sense to just get the warrants, even 3 days late ? Who in Bush's Dept. of Justification is approving this stuff I ask ? No matter, they'll still be there until we rid ourselves of them come 2008 anyway.

Enjoy the next few years, unless the R's have an epiphany and realize that impeachment is a GOOD thing when it's about more than fellatio in the office !
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BR_Parkway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-05-06 04:19 PM
Response to Original message
8. OMG - absolute, irrefutable proof that Clinton was at fault! The
freepers must be going nuts.

All Hail the Mighty Clenis, the part of our party that keeps the Party of Personal Responsibility from ever having to take any responsibility.

Some people say...There are those who think...Unnamed sources...

Um, isn't there some "investigation" going on right now (a year later) over people leaking NSA info? Wonder who had the big brass ones to leak this info, right in the middle of a leak investigation? And that it helps point a finger away from the ShrubCo (mis)Administration illegal acts is strictly a coincidence!

Anyone want to buy a bridge?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Just Me Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-05-06 04:29 PM
Response to Original message
9. Destroying evidence = yet another crime(s).
Let's see,...uh,...obstruction, conspiracy, RICO, I'm pretty sure destruction of federal docs to cover-up criminal activity is a stand-alone crime,....

This shit has gotten so damned ridiculous and out of control, I have to LMAO!!! :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mom cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-05-06 05:09 PM
Response to Original message
10. Thanks Jason!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 07:30 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC