Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Would Bush prosecute the Times?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-05-06 02:10 PM
Original message
Would Bush prosecute the Times?
The Gray Lady in shadow
Could publication of the domestic-spying story lead to indictment of the New York Times?


Fearful that his presidency could be swept into the same historical dustbin as Richard Nixon’s, an unrepentant President George W. Bush seems intent on prosecuting the sources who leaked to the New York Times the details of his administration’s warrantless domestic spying. But does Bush have the chutzpah to go after the Times itself?

A variety of federal statutes, from the Espionage Act on down, give Bush ample means to prosecute the Times reporters who got the scoop, James Risen and Eric Lichtblau, as well as the staff editors who facilitated publication. Even Executive Editor Bill Keller and Publisher Arthur "Pinch" Sulzberger Jr., could become targets — a startling possibility, just the threat of which would serve as a deterrent to the entire Fourth Estate.

Legal means are one thing, but political will is another. If Bush goes after the Times, he could spark a conflagration potentially more destructive to a free press — or to his administration — than Nixon’s 1971 Pentagon Papers machinations, which included efforts to stop publication of the classified study of the Vietnam War, the aborted prosecution of leaker Daniel Ellsberg, and the intention to prosecute newspapers (and their employees) that ran the document. All backfired on Nixon.

http://bostonphoenix.com/boston/news_features/other_stories/multi_5/documents/05188679.asp

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
villager Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-05-06 02:11 PM
Response to Original message
1. could be a "Fort Sumter" moment if he does that.. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wtbymark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-05-06 02:17 PM
Response to Original message
2. prosecute someone/thing for reporting a crime?
what chimpy did was illegal, how can he prosecute? That should be the Times' next headline
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NightOwwl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-05-06 02:18 PM
Response to Original message
3. Bring it on, Chimp.
BRING. IT. ON. ASSHOLE.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cliss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-05-06 03:16 PM
Response to Original message
4. There are some serious problems with this
article.

first of all, Bush knew the Times was going to print this article. He met with them in their office, about 10 days before it went to print. Bush knew who the writers were. He urged them to not print the story. Then, he acts surprised when the story was "leaked". Is shocked, vows Cowboy Justice.


And why should Bush go after the New York Times? After all, they're bestest Friends. The Times knew about this whole sordid mess a long time ago. They withheld publication so Bush could get himself "re-selected". If the public knew about this last year, he would not have gotten the "nomination".

So Bush: try to remember who your friends are.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dusmcj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-05-06 05:49 PM
Response to Original message
5. I hope he does and the Eastern establishment wakes up
and bitchslaps his ass back to Crawford. Romper Room in the West Wing gets tiresome after a while.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 04:32 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC