Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

spoke to a friend regarding her Marine nephew in Iraq

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
redwitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-07-06 04:57 PM
Original message
spoke to a friend regarding her Marine nephew in Iraq
Friend is former air force. I just spoke to her about her nephew whom she loves dearly and is very proud of- and he is proud to serve his country. He told her when he was home around Christmas he likes the Iraqi people very much and wishes he could do more to help. She then asked him if what he is doing there will matter in the long run if we pull out next week, next year or in ten years. He sadly shook his head. Neither he nor any of his comrades are under any sort of delusion about it. When we leave, Iraq will become a bloodbath. The thing is,we all see it going that way WITH our troops there. It is absolutely sinful and criminal and appalling and I don't even have the words today. We have destroyed another country. I actually think they were better off with Saddam Hussein in charge. That's how badly we have fucked up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Sammy Pepys Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-07-06 05:00 PM
Response to Original message
1. I don't think they were better off with Saddam....
...but that's not to say everything is rainbows and puppy dogs now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jacobin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-07-06 05:03 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. I do.
We WERE far better off with him in charge. He was no worse than a dozen other tin pot dictators and we have out-tortured and out-destroyed infrastucture and out-murdered Iraqis by far.

The oil was flowing and the tribal factions who want to kill each other were kept in check.

We are not able to do either.

I predicted when this war started that we would wish Saddam was back in power in two years. So far, only Imus has made that observation, only half in jest.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sammy Pepys Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-07-06 05:11 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. Well, I'm not talking about "WE"...
We WERE far better off with him in charge.

I'm talking about the people that actually had to deal with the inconvenience of living under him in Iraq.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-07-06 06:01 PM
Response to Reply #9
37. You mean like the young women who attended the university
in Baghdad under Saddam, who today can't leave the house without a male relative?

Things under Saddam were not good, but there were not a hundred people a day getting blown up of gunned down under his reign. Things were not good, but the electricity was on for more than 4 hours a day. Things were not good, but the water flowed more than every third day. Things were not good, but Shia and Sunni were not blowing up each others' mosques. Things were not good, but Christian Iraqis were left in peace and even held positions in the government.

Yes, he led them into two disastrous wars, before we invaded in 2003, but only because he had our approval and support -- if we had not supported it, he would not have attacked Iran; if we had not indicated our tacit approval, he would not have attacked Kuwait.

He was a far less bloody dictator than many we made no move to stop - Mugabe and Amin come to mind. When we hated the communists, he cracked down on the communists in his country. When we hated the Iranian mullahs, he started a war against the Iranian mullahs.

He was us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
immoderate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-07-06 05:41 PM
Response to Reply #5
31. Bill Mahar said it too.
--IMM
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
atreides1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-07-06 05:03 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. It depends on how you look at it
The people had electricity, running water, garbage pick-up, woman and girls could attend school without being attacked by religious zealots, it wasn't all great but at least it was better then what they have now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sammy Pepys Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-07-06 05:13 PM
Response to Reply #7
12. We've got all that now, too...
Should we give up impeaching Bush?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redwitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-07-06 05:20 PM
Response to Reply #12
16. I don't really see the point of that statement.
Bush should be impeached. What say we get the Chinese to do it? They can invade and occupy the US, set up checkpoints, take over the prisons, the power sources, the newspapers can be full of their propaganda...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sammy Pepys Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-07-06 05:23 PM
Response to Reply #16
19. The point is...
...if having running water and electricity and such are good enough reasons to bring a guy like Saddam back into power, than why bother getting rid of Bush? By those standards, we've got ourselves the next freakin' George Washington. Impeaching him would be ridiculous.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redwitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-07-06 05:26 PM
Response to Reply #19
21. One more time Sammy: NO ONE IS SUGGESTING BRINGING SADDAM BACK
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sammy Pepys Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-07-06 05:30 PM
Response to Reply #21
25. I KNOW
THE PROBLEM IS THE LEVEL OF DEFERENCE HE SEEMS TO BE GETTING HERE.

"Oh, people had running water and electricity, so Saddam couldn't have been all that bad." That ranks up there as some of the most ridiculous rubbish I've ever heard in my life.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bandit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-07-06 06:11 PM
Response to Reply #25
38. Why do you think Bush 1 decided to leave him in power?
If he was even half as bad as you seem to think why did we leave him in power in 1991? Because we thought the country would quickly deteriorate into Civil War and become a complete mess. Guess what has happened? Saddam is probably no worse than Bush* as far as the brutality that has occured under his watch..It is a fact that Iraq was a Secular Government and the most Westernized of all Mideast/Arabic countries. Saddam was our friend for more than a decade while he was supposedly doing all his evil. In fact we provided weapons of the worst sort for him. But why recognize the truth when the propaganda is so much more fun????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redwitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-07-06 05:09 PM
Response to Reply #1
8. Saddam is a rotten son of a bitch as were his sons
and all the thugs who propped him up and were responsible for the misery of his regime. But what have we done for them that makes their lives better?
Unending civil war?
Infrastructure crumbling?
No dependable electricity or running water?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sammy Pepys Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-07-06 05:12 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. I didn't say we had made their lives better...
But I don't think wishing Saddam back into power is going to significantly improve their current situation. Frankly, it's ridiculous.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redwitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-07-06 05:16 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. I don't wish him back into power
And I have absolutely no idea how to improve their lives now. Nada. Zip. You have an idea or two you're holding back? I'd like to hear them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sammy Pepys Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-07-06 05:20 PM
Response to Reply #13
17. No, I don't...
But how we're trying to do it now is definitely not working, and bringin Saddam back is just ludicrous. Those are two ideas that certainly won't work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redwitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-07-06 05:23 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. No one has suggested bringing back Saddam.
Clearly that is not an option. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sammy Pepys Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-07-06 05:26 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. Yeah, but everyone sure is rushing to his defense...
saying Iraq would be better with him there. I don't know what to think of that, especially considering the guy we've got in the White House.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redwitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-07-06 05:30 PM
Response to Reply #20
24. No one here likes Saddam. No one is rushing to his defense.
He was horrible. All I am suggesting is that I see nothing but misery and civil war in Iraq's future- and we caused it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sammy Pepys Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-07-06 05:31 PM
Response to Reply #24
26. Have you been reading any of the other responses in this thread? n/t
...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maru Kitteh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-07-06 05:44 PM
Response to Reply #26
32. Your reply was to the OP who never suggested bringing Saddam back besides
which such a scenario is clearly not possible. Arguing against that which is not possible seems pointless.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Media_Lies_Daily Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-07-06 05:16 PM
Response to Reply #1
14. Hmmmm. The Iraqi people could walk the streets of Baghdad....
...with no fear of being killed, Iraqis worshipped in peace at the church, synagogue, or mosque of their choice, electricity was present in every home and business, running water was present in every home and business, and healthcare was as good as it could be considering the fact that our sanctions kept the Iraqis from getting the medicines they needed.

Even before the illegal invasion and occupation of Iraq, some of us knew for a fact that there were no WMDs in that country, no connections to Al Qaeda, no mass graves except those of Iranians who had died during the Iraq-Iran War, and absolutely no intent to invade any neighboring countries. To top it all off, the story that circulated about Saddam gassing his own people has also proven to be false...the gas used was used only by Iran at the time those people were killed.

I'm sorry, but I don't see how anyone in their right mind can believe that Iraq is better off now than they were under Saddam. Most of that country currently has no electricity, no water, and very little incoming food supplies. The Iraqis are afraid to go anywhere in their own country, even to work or school. Medical supplies and personnel are in very short supply.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laelth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-07-06 06:46 PM
Response to Reply #1
41. I think the Iraqi people WERE better off under Saddam.
That's my opinion. You are, of course, entitled to yours.

-Laelth
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadMaddie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-07-06 05:01 PM
Response to Original message
2. That's what Pat Buchanan said the other day....
I don't listen to him often...I was passing by...

He said as despicable as Saddam was it was his tyranny that held that country together.

The * Cabal was warned and they "broke international law" by going into Iraq....

Our soldiers deaths should be included in the death toll when he is proscecuted by the Hague!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobbieinok Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-07-06 05:27 PM
Response to Reply #2
23. also said of Tito...'it was his iron control that kept the peoples of
Yugoslavia from slaughtering each other'
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
atreides1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-07-06 05:01 PM
Response to Original message
3. They had stability
And people were employed, had water, electricity, no drive by shootings, no kidnappings, and no religious zealots making the rules.

Now since the US invasion the people of Iraq suffer more then they did.

But Saddam was still an evil man, just like George Bush!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IsItJustMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-07-06 05:03 PM
Response to Original message
4. Saddam was an SOB, but he was their SOB
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-07-06 05:44 PM
Response to Reply #4
33. No, Saddam was OUR SOB. We, the United States put him in charge.
He had a job to do and he did it as long as he was able. This merry gang of criminals in charge her now set him up to maintain stability in Iraq. And that he did. We took him out and things have been going down hill ever since.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IsItJustMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-07-06 09:36 PM
Response to Reply #33
42. I stand corrected. I forgot about that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MasonJar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-07-06 05:03 PM
Response to Original message
6. Who are we to say they were not better off? All those now dead
children (who should have been alive another 80+ years) are certainly not better off. Neither are their dead and/or maimed relatives.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluerum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-07-06 05:13 PM
Response to Original message
11. Saddam is a sadistic bastard - but he kept control in the country.
Whether Iraq is better off now than it was 5 years ago is kind of a subjective question. I think in some ways it is, but in many others it is not.

I suppose one could say that the country has a chance for a future now. This is the thing that should give the people that are suffering under the current state of affairs in Iraq some hope - what will it be like in 5 or 10 years? Will Iraq recover?

Certainly the dead and injured leave painful memories - the economy is in ruins - the country is occupied - there is street fighting amongst religious and political factions - there are snipers on the streets - military checkpoints are everywhere - being tortured in jail or prison is SOP; just a different gang doing it - POLITICAL ASSASSINATIONS ARE COMMONPLACE.

How do you justify saying that Iraqi's are better off? Its seems to me that the main reason for saying that is that Saddam and his government (some of them) are in jail and his sons are dead. You may not agree with his politics and methods but people could walk the streets.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wakeme2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-07-06 05:16 PM
Response to Original message
15. The ppl there was much better off under Saddam
they had water, electric and women were treated much better than in places like Saudi.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kashka-Kat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-07-06 05:27 PM
Response to Original message
22. better off/ worse off -- why even go there
Edited on Tue Mar-07-06 05:29 PM by Kashka-Kat
Somewhere I read an article (wish I could lay my hands on it) written by young Iraqi man who said that almost certainly his generation would've overthrown Saddam themselves and established a true democracy. Because Saddam had forced women out of burkas and into the workforce, for the children of these women, equality and western style democracy was not such a stretch as it might be for the more traditional islamic places.

By our actions the US has delayed the progression to self-determination indefinitely--at least a generation. Those d*mn bases you know are going to be there at least until the oil dries up. That to me is the ultimate tragedy of this debacle.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadMaddie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-07-06 05:34 PM
Response to Reply #22
28. I agree...it wasn't our business.....to go there...
The US is going to get kicked out just like the British did...those bases will be destroyed....they don't want us there....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Minnesota Libra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-07-06 05:31 PM
Response to Original message
27. Saddam and his sons were cruel and sadistic BUT THEY WERE ALSO......
....religiously much more liberal than many of the other muslim countries in the area. Yes, this whole Iraq thing has been a MAJOR screw up that we will be paying the price for the next 50 to 100 years from now. Those people ADO NOT FORGET or FORGIVE esily.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-07-06 05:35 PM
Response to Original message
29. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Richard Steele Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-07-06 05:54 PM
Response to Reply #29
35. Who we gonna believe? Tobias, or our lying eyes?
QUOTE:
"But take a stroll down any Shia' or Kurdish slum in Iraq,
and 95% will tell you they are better off now.
"

Where did you get this so-called "fact", tobiascore?
Not even B*shCabal™ itself is making such preposterous assertations these days.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-07-06 05:58 PM
Response to Reply #35
36. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Richard Steele Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-07-06 06:19 PM
Response to Reply #36
39. Yes, and I asked you what those 'sources' were.
And I am still waiting for an answer.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-07-06 06:24 PM
Response to Reply #39
40. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Maru Kitteh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-07-06 05:39 PM
Response to Original message
30. I hope her Nephew gets out of there before he learns to hate them
because that's what war does. I hope he comes home soon and gets help if he needs it. God bless him for his service and his obviously kind heart. :patriot: :hug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redwitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-07-06 05:51 PM
Response to Reply #30
34. I agree.
My friend was so sad when I spoke to her about him. She is very afraid for him, the job he does is very dangerous. And you are a sweetie to think of him, I will tell her. :hug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 05:15 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC