Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

We Won! (H.Con.Res. 197) Amendment-No Permanent Bases in Iraq

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 06:32 PM
Original message
We Won! (H.Con.Res. 197) Amendment-No Permanent Bases in Iraq
We Won! (H.Con.Res. 197)

Barbara Lee Amendment on Permanent Bases Approved in Debate on Iraq War Supplemental Spending Bill

(Washington, DC) - Today, during debate on the to an emergency spending bill for the War in Iraq, the House approved an amendment introduced by Congresswoman Barbara Lee (D-Oakland) that will prohibit the use of funds to enter in to basing agreements that would lead to a permanent military presence in Iraq.

The amendment to H.R.4939, the administration’s $91 billion supplemental request for Iraq, Afghanistan and Katrina relief, was approved by a voice vote. Lee, who last year introduced H.Con.Res. 197, to make it “the policy of the United States not to enter into any base agreement with the Government of Iraq that would lead to a permanent United States military presence in Iraq,” gave the following statement on the House floor:

http://spidel.net/blog/?p=540
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MrSlayer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 06:36 PM
Response to Original message
1. Do you think the PNAC will care or follow this?
They're already doing it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
katinmn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 06:37 PM
Response to Original message
2. Yay! Approved on a voice vote.
:applause:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jayhawk Lib Donating Member (587 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 06:37 PM
Response to Original message
3. Are you sure this is a good thing????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 06:40 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. hell yes
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jayhawk Lib Donating Member (587 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 07:36 PM
Response to Reply #5
11. Sometimes our hatred for Bush blinds us
so much that we do not see the big picture.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 07:40 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. the big picture is that we meddle in other peoples business too much
Edited on Thu Mar-16-06 07:42 PM by LSK
Can you provide us with a reason for having permanent bases there? Besides blanket statements?

The United States needs to stop messing with everyones business and join the rest of the world and support the UN. If the United Nations deems a reason to have a base there, than so be it. However the United States DOES NOT RUN THE WORLD.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kailassa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 06:39 PM
Response to Original message
4. Did anyone find out Buschco's definition of "permanent" ?
Nothing is permanent in this world, neither America's bases in the Middle East or the oil that is the reason for them being there. But I'll be very surprised if the bases disappear before the oli does.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Buck Rabbit Donating Member (999 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 06:45 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. Exactly. Is a 100 year lease permanent or temporary?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rosco T. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 06:41 PM
Response to Original message
6. .. and Chimpy adds a 'signing statement' and it goes away.. n/m
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pirate Smile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 06:42 PM
Response to Original message
7. The problem is will it make it out of the Conference Committee or
just mysteriously disappear.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CrazyOrangeCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 06:46 PM
Response to Original message
9. They just proved today in Iraq . . .
. . . that we are a fascist superpower. NeoCons answer to no laws. They will have to be dragged, kicking and screaming, from their war-rooms.

Miserable fucks. What a depressing day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 06:53 PM
Response to Original message
10. Great fodder for Republicans
I can hear them now, "we passed a resolution against permanent bases", and the fence sitters will eat it right up and vote them back in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Disturbed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 07:43 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. Those bases are "Temporary,"
They will be there for about 25 years or when the oil in Iraq is gone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 07:52 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. Yep, and now they've got a resolution to prove it n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mdmc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-16-06 08:25 PM
Response to Original message
15. k/r
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
genie_weenie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-17-06 08:44 AM
Response to Original message
16. Nope! All that's going to happen is
similar to the agreement between Japan and the US in 1972 with the Treaty of Mutual Cooperation and Security and the Status of Forces Agreement committing both nations to mutual security and common dangers.

In late 2008, the US and Iraq will hammer out the equivalent treaties. Allowing the US to have bases in Iraq on a temporary basis until the War On Terror is finished, which will be a "long hard slog" although the enemy is in the "last throes".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 06:32 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC