Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

New York Says Poor Must Pay for Recreation

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Rose Siding Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-17-06 11:47 PM
Original message
New York Says Poor Must Pay for Recreation
St. Mary's Recreation Center is a rare amenity in the South Bronx. Its swimming pool, gym, boxing ring and basketball courts give the neighborhood, where two in five people live in poverty, a full range of athletic choices free.

Starting July 1, the city's Department of Parks and Recreation plans to set membership fees of $50 to $75 a year at St. Mary's and five other recreation centers, all of them in low-income neighborhoods in the Bronx, Manhattan or Brooklyn. Children 17 and under would still be admitted free, and adults would have the option of paying the mandatory annual fee in two or four installments. Residents 55 and over would pay only $10 a year.
....
The effort to expand fees has drawn criticism from some park activists, politicians and historians. They have noted that the six centers are in neighborhoods with high rates of obesity and diabetes, health problems that Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg has pledged to confront.
....
Parks officials say that New Yorkers have many more recreational opportunities now, at a time when fitness is emphasized. They note that many private gyms charge up to $200 a month, not to mention initiation fees as high as $800. "This is still the best deal in town," said Warner Johnston, a spokesman for the Parks Department, who added, "Fifty dollars doesn't typically cover the price to join a private gym, let alone cover most monthly charges."

http://nytimes.com/2006/03/18/nyregion/18recreation.html?hp&ex=1142658000&en=78c0a53ab95c7c5f&ei=5094&partner=homepage
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
SammyWinstonJack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-17-06 11:53 PM
Response to Original message
1. "Compassionate Conservatism" Damn! Hey, more tax cuts for the rich!
Yep! That's the ticket! :sarcasm: And the rich are rewarded. Might I sight the Academy Awards where the Presenters are given 'gift packages" of up wards of $100,000. This Country sucks!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 08:00 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC