Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

O'Reilly Adds Another Newspaper to His Blacklist

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
stewert Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-21-06 10:03 AM
Original message
O'Reilly Adds Another Newspaper to His Blacklist

Last night Billy put the Dayton Daily News on his media defamation blacklist. They were put on the list because they published op-eds supporting judge Connor, and they dared to criticize king O'Reilly for his biased and misleading coverage of the judge.

O'Reilly personally hammered Jeff Bruce for an editorial about Judge Connor, who O'Reilly has decided should be impeached. O'Reilly had a graphic of a police badge with Smear Patrol, written below it was this.

"The most vile and irresponsible editorial I have ever seen in an American Newspaper."

Not only did he show a picture of Jeff Bruce, he also published his e-mail address telling his viewers to get in touch with him.

Here is the full list.

- Dayton Daily News
- New York Daily News
- The St. Petersburg Times
- MSNBC
- The New Yorker Magazine
- Newsday
- US News & World Report
- Atlanta Journal-Constitution

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
sakabatou Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-21-06 10:05 AM
Response to Original message
1. Pot meet kettle
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stewert Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-21-06 10:24 AM
Response to Reply #1
5. Editorial......

Here is the editorial that O'Reilly cited.

O'Reilly's rantings shouldn't be a factor

http://www.daytondailynews.com/opinion/content/opinion/daily/0319connor.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bryant69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-21-06 10:05 AM
Response to Original message
2. You'd think some of those outfits would have folded by now
given the awesome power of Mr. O'Rielly. How are they resisting the pressure?

Bryant
Check it out --> http://politicalcomment.blogspot.com
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tanyev Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-21-06 10:08 AM
Response to Original message
3. Jeez, Bill. You've made it so negative and so complicated.
Just put ALL newspapers and magazines on your blacklist and then when any of them distinguish themselves for outstanding loyalty to the Fuhrer, you can give them an award and take them off the list. You can present them one with one of your Peabody Awards you're so proud of. You've got hundreds of them just sitting around, right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fleshdancer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-21-06 10:12 AM
Response to Original message
4. Is he the nut job who is boycotting Canada?
or is that Hannity? And are they all still boycotting French wine?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stewert Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-21-06 10:25 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. Boycott.......

O'Reilly is the nutjob who is boycotting France.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlCzervik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-21-06 10:27 AM
Response to Original message
7. How has the NYT avoided being on his list? I know he hates Krugman
and Kristof, ih yeah and Frank Rich--who else am i missing?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
corkerjoe Donating Member (31 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-21-06 10:35 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. bill o reily
Is that pervert still on
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stewert Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-21-06 11:13 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. More Facts on The Judge Connor Story

O'Reilly said the reason the impeachment of Judge Connor fell through is because the Democrats refused to vote for it, when in reality the Republicans decided to not bring it up for a vote. And the REPUBLICAN Ohio Supreme Court Chief Justice said Judge Connor should not be impeached.

---------

Ohio is on a growing list of states that restrict where sex offenders are allowed to live. In 2003, state lawmakers passed legislation that forbids sex-crime convicts from living within 1,000 feet of schools.

This kind of anti-anxiety medicine comes at a considerable cost, especially in the time law enforcement personnel must spend away from other crime-fighting.

Montgomery County Prosecutor Mat Heck determined that about 200 offenders lived within forbidden zones. Greene County authorities found out that about 100 sex offenders violated the restrictions.

The costs add up — especially in a state with about 13,500 offenders. Do the benefits justify the expense?

The statewide association of Iowa prosecutors convincingly argues the answer is no. The prosecutors understand the public's fears but offer facts: Broad residency restrictions do little to promote child safety.

-------

Strangers do sometimes commit sex crimes against children after gaining access to them at or around schools, playgrounds, parks and school bus stops, they explain. But it's rare.

The much bigger threat is from relatives and acquaintances — who commit as many as 90 percent of sex crimes against children.

The Iowa prosecutors also argue that residency restrictions so limit the places ex-offenders can live that they are more likely to register under a false address or drop out of the system altogether.

Restrictions also may prevent offenders from living at the home of family members best able to stabilize their lives, or at facilities recommended by parole and probation officials.

-------

Then, of course, there are the enforcement costs. One Iowa county estimated that it would cost $2.7 million to identify, evict and jail offenders of an ordinance that prohibits sex offenders from living within 2,000 feet of schools, day care centers, and numerous other facilities.

More.......

www.daytondailynews.com/opinion/content/opinion/daily/0320sexoffender_.html

On Thursday, the day the real NCAA March madness started, Attorney General Jim Petro and Secretary of State J. Kenneth Blackwell came to the Mandalay Banquet Center in Moraine to speak at the Montgomery County Republican Party's annual Lincoln Day Dinner.

Blackwell and Petro each want to be the Republican candidate for governor and told the crowd why.

Blackwell also explained why Petro wouldn't be a good choice. For one thing, Petro's a latecomer to the crusade against abortion and, while sincere, must be considered "on probation," warned Blackwell.

Petro didn't hear the warning.

He'd already headed back to Columbus to join other Republicans in banging away on Franklin County Common Pleas Judge John A. Connor.

Connor — wouldn't you know it? — is a Democrat.

------

Bill The O'Reilly Factor O'Reilly of Fox News heard about the case and began blasting away at the judge.

Petro and Gov. Bob Taft joined the blasting, calling for Connor's removal.

-------

Speaker Jon Husted, R-Kettering, got riled up, too. He said the House would review how it could go about impeaching Connor.

Husted, by the way, missed the Lincoln Day Dinner so he could make a TV appearance denouncing Connor.

-------

Republicans are eager to change the subject and have been looking for things — preferably Democrats — to get indignant about. Selva and Connor suited their purpose.

One Republican killjoy, Ohio Supreme Court Chief Justice Thomas Moyer, flashed a caution light in front of hard chargers Husted, Taft and Petro.

"We need to be very cautious before embarking on a course of action that may have the unintended consequence of causing judges to fear retribution from the legislative and executive branches whenever they are dissatisfied with the outcome of a particular case," Moyer said. "This type of atmosphere could seriously damage the impartiality of the courts."

Moyer later thanked legislative leaders for not going ahead with impeachment. Petro, however, still sounded indignant and said he was disappointed that some House members didn't want to impeach Connor.

More.....

www.daytondailynews.com/localnews/content/localnews/daily/0319hershey.html

In another article we find this out, and none of this was ever mentioned by O'Reilly.

It turns out prosecutors wanted to make a plea deal, because there were problems with how the case had been handled. The Columbus Dispatch reported that probation in sexual assault cases are not uncommon on the local common pleas court. What's more, the offender in Judge Connor's case wasn't just turned loose.

He will undergo residential treatment and a year of home detention. He will spend eight years in prison if he violates his probation.

------

House Speaker Jon Husted — ordinarily known for being careful and deliberate — got caught up in the case, saying he would "examine" the possibility of Judge Connor's removal.

Mr. Husted ended up Friday on the high road, deciding not to pursue impeachment. He correctly realized that Ohio is best served by a court system governed by due process — not gutless politicians egged on by a cable television crank.

More.......

www.daytondailynews.com/opinion/content/opinion/daily/0319connor.html

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Squatch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-21-06 11:15 AM
Response to Original message
10. Soon, all he'll have left is Archie and Jughead comics
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sydnie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-21-06 11:17 AM
Response to Original message
11. Then those are the papers I want to read! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 09:57 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC