Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

" To assume I wanted war is just flat wrong, Helen, in all due respect."

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
BurtWorm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-21-06 04:02 PM
Original message
" To assume I wanted war is just flat wrong, Helen, in all due respect."
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,2087-1650822,00.html

The Sunday Times June 12, 2005


Ministers were told of need for Gulf war ‘excuse’
Michael Smith



MINISTERS were warned in July 2002 that Britain was committed to taking part in an American-led invasion of Iraq and they had no choice but to find a way of making it legal.
The warning, in a leaked Cabinet Office briefing paper, said Tony Blair had already agreed to back military action to get rid of Saddam Hussein at a summit at the Texas ranch of President George W Bush three months earlier.



The briefing paper, for participants at a meeting of Blair’s inner circle on July 23, 2002, said that since regime change was illegal it was “necessary to create the conditions” which would make it legal.

...

The suggestions that the allies use the UN to justify war contradicts claims by Blair and Bush, repeated during their Washington summit last week, that they turned to the UN in order to avoid having to go to war. The attack on Iraq finally began in March 2003.

The briefing paper is certain to add to the pressure, particularly on the American president, because of the damaging revelation that Bush and Blair agreed on regime change in April 2002 and then looked for a way to justify it.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
eleny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-21-06 04:03 PM
Response to Original message
1. What a pile of squeeze-out
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BOSSHOG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-21-06 04:07 PM
Response to Original message
2. Obviously a bone to the base
Oh no, we would never want to kill "ragheads." We are good "christians" and just listen to our powerful leader being trashed by a liberal hack journalist.

"Conservatives" suck so much Mr Oreck should market them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
coalition_unwilling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-21-06 04:08 PM
Response to Original message
3. I watched it this morning and was simply appalled that
none of Helen Thomas' colleagues (male or female) rose to her defense, in the face of *'s patronizing, condescending, arrogant response to her.

It made me so mad that, as soon as it was over, I took my sign and went and stood on my street-corner for two hours. (I've been doing that a lot lately :)

BTW: The sign reads "Bush's Exit Strategy" and shows a picture (drawn by my wife) of a guy doubled over with his head up his ass trying to extricate it. Don't have a digital camera, so can't post a photo yet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
warrens Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-21-06 04:08 PM
Response to Original message
4. We don't assume, we know...
Big difference.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kenny blankenship Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-21-06 04:34 PM
Response to Original message
5. Hey Chimp, if that's true then why does your first Treasury Sec. state
in his book that you held cabinet meetings on how you could plausibly start a war with Iraq, months before 9/11 occurred?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 05:22 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC