Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

BIG STORM: THE LYNNDIE ENGLAND STORY Doc...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
HardWorkingDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-23-06 02:02 PM
Original message
BIG STORM: THE LYNNDIE ENGLAND STORY Doc...
I just saw the last fifteen or twenty minutes of this documentary and plan to try and catch the rest of it, but the little I did see left me as angry as hell.

I'm not defending what she did, but dammit, there are others out there more responsible for all of this abuse than she is. No one will ever be able to persuade me that these soldiers were not manipulated into doing what they did by others and that their role has been very carefully blurred by winks and nods. No one will ever be able to prove to me that young, easily led soldiers knew the cultural aspects of what it means to Arab men to be led on a dog leash or forced to be naked with other men. Hell, I have an advanced degree and was ignorant to many aspects of their culture until this mess hit (simulating masturbation in front of each other, nude while women present, fear of dogs, et cetera).

When I recall my own military background, the most realistic portrayal of what the higher ups have gotten away with is very similar to the role Jack Nicholson played in the movie "A Few Good Men."

People, somebody or many somebodies, some where ordered this fucking bullshit and then were able to leave the lowest ranking people holding the bags.



http://www.sundancechannel.com/film/?ixFilmID=6866&rname=The%20Sundance%20Channel%20Schedule
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
acmavm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-23-06 02:05 PM
Response to Original message
1. Yes, there are others WAY more responsible. But she had
a choice to make, right or wrong. She decided that having a good time (however one could ever describe what she did as a good time??) with her trashy lover rather than show the decency we expect from a human being and a member of the armed services of this country.

She is no innocent by any means.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HardWorkingDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-23-06 02:20 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Here's the thing...
I believe it was in Moore's F9/11 where a young solider was asked what he wanted to go to Iraq for and he said to get a little payback for the WTC towers coming down. This with the one time 75 percent belief that Hussein was behind 9/11 shows us an angle we need to look at this issue from.

The reason I mention this, is that many, many of these young, easily swayed people have been taken advantage of. From the start they have been told things like these people apprehended are the ones responsible for 9/11, that they are less than human, that they have vital information and very possibly, that some of these acts are even legal.

Like I said, I'm not trying to defend their actions, but we back home here must understand the environment that these acts occurred in. We must take into consideration many things. For example, I am a 41 yr old educated person who believes in human rights, but I can't imagine the influence these mysterious people have had over the many young, naive and uneducated soldiers miles away from home that were probably told by their own chain of command to not worry about these things.

What I can imagine is that some "mysterious stranger" with a huge amount of power and influence directed much of what went on in those prisons.

(And please don't take this to mean the beatings, extreme abuse or murder - of course there are things that plainly wrong no matter what - the things I'm bringing up are those that these soldiers are being jailed for - England's parading around of a leashed man or the solider just sent to jail for siccing a dog on a human.)

My point is that someone, somewhere came in and had to have told these people that these things were legal, justifiable and allowable and then have so far been able to walk away.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RaleighNCDUer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-23-06 02:38 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. Someone?
How about General Miller, I think it was, who was transferred on Rumsfeld's orders to take over Abu Grahib after having been in charge of the concentration camp at Gitmo? The abuses at AG only began after he took charge.

There is no mysterious 'someone'. There is a clear chain of command, and this shit came from the top.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheBaldyMan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-23-06 02:08 PM
Response to Original message
2. but ... but ... they were just softening them up for the sheer joy of it
seriously the blame for it lies squarely with the Bush administration.

They went in short on manpower ignoring requests for extra MPs and security troops with a consequent staffing of prisons with inexperienced guards.

Intelligence officers encouraged the guards to mistreat prisoners and collude in illegal detentions and interrogations.

The troops that were prosecuted were only the tip of a very large and extensive iceberg and the corruption goes all the way up to Rumsfeld AT LEAST.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DinahMoeHum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-23-06 02:27 PM
Response to Original message
4. "If you are doomed to eat shit, you may as well bring your own fork"
said writer Joe Bageant of Lynndie England:

Link:
http://www.joebageant.com/joe/2004/06/mash_note_for_t.html

(snip)
Lynndie England never had a chance. Abu Ghraib, or maybe something even worse (an RPG up the shorts, for instance) was always her destiny...Forty-six percent of the American dead in Iraq came from towns of less than 40,000. Yet these towns make up only 25% of our population. Most of the young soldiers were fleeing economically depressed places, or dead end jobs like Lynndie had at the chicken processing plant. These so-called volunteers are part of this nation's de facto draft -- economic conscription. Money is always the best whip to use on the laboring classes. Thirteen hundred a month, a signing bonus and free room and board sure beats the hell out of yanking guts through a chicken's ass.

And there are those big bucks for college later. Up to $65,000. Lynndie was supposedly going to college after her enlistment to become a "storm chaser," like in the Helen Hunt movie "Twister." Yeah, right. There are millions of openings in the tornado chasing business. And I'm going to be the centerfold in the next Playgirl beefcake issue. I suppose lots of poor kids do go to college on their military benefits. But personally speaking, I can count the number I know who actually did it on one hand. Let's be honest here: graduating from a small town redneck white high school not knowing where Alaska is on a map of the US is not exactly the path to the fountain at Harvard Yard. But I suspect that down inside Lynndie knew her lot in life from the start -- she wore combat boots and camo outfits to high school. Swore she loved it. If you are doomed to eat shit, you may as well bring your own fork.

(snip)

:smoke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arkansas Granny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-23-06 02:31 PM
Response to Original message
5. The soldiers who have been prosecuted probably deserve the
sentences that have been handed down for their actions. However, I don't believe that these actions would have been so widespread and openly committed if they hadn't been condoned, suggested or initiated by their senior officers. I don't believe the higher-ups can even claim that they didn't know what was happening. If they didn't know, they should have. IMO this issue goes all the way to the top of the military hierarchy and so should the prosecution.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Horse with no Name Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-23-06 02:35 PM
Response to Original message
6. I'm just curious what their families thought
When they requested that they be sent leashes, dog collars and cattle prods.
Oh wait...they didn't request them from home?
I guess they got them at the nearest Walmart in Iraq?
Hmmm no stores around Abu Ghraib? Hmmm.
I wonder where they got those items?:popcorn:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofthedial Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-23-06 02:40 PM
Response to Original message
8. in the military, you undoubtedly learned in which direction
the brown stuff flows


especially in an ownership society
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 05:41 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC