Christopher Hitchens said there were unfound WMDs in Iraq

The gin soaked popinjay said it on Hardball. Said Little Lord Pissypants didn't lie about WMDs because they were in Iraq but Saddam must have got rid of them.

:rofl:

but I can't prove it.

:eyes:

And lots and lots of ponies!

them at one time. We knew that 95% of them were destroyed. We were unsure about 5%. Bush used this 5% as justification (in post 9-11-01, we need 100% certainty).

incoherent anymore. Sad, really.

I (almost) see it all now.

the big purse i use when i go to the movies to smuggle in my own snacks.

:rofl:

WMD

wonder what the weather is like in their world?

include elaborate geopolitical delusions.

that'd be different.

Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.

MIHOP is just another cult full of superstitious believers.

Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.

I know all about it. :nopity:

thats why i gave you a link to that excellent documentary

peace

:rofl:

psst... pass the word ;->

peace

They're happy to throw science out the window too, along with reason and logic, for a religious belief.

i was wondering why you had such a hard time with the truth.

just remember that snarky one liners make a poor substitute for a lamp post or a foundation to hold up the official story.


peace

And I'll point them to your propaganda as the other end of the spectrum.

Two completely ridiculous and obviously flawed theories, each with their own set of believers.

Good thing the skeptics are in between you guys.

THE NEW PEARL HARBOR
Disturbing Questions about the Bush Administration and 9/11
by David Ray Griffin
foreword by Richard Folk

A must-read for all who want to get past the conspiracy of silence and mystification that surrounds 911.

read online here...
http://vancouver.indymedia.org/news/2004/06/141355.php

thank gore he 'invented' the INTERNETs :bounce:

peace

It's a shortcut to the mindset of paranoid whackos, less time consuming.

They work for the right.

fyi

peace

That's real upside-down talk.

Maybe we can get Richard Verrall to tell us the TRUTH
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_Verrall

Good comparison, lots of people listened to him too, in spite of all the evidence to the contrary.

I mean, I don't see the logic in developing weapons then hiding/moving them when you are attacked. Is it just me? :crazy:

The fun I have with the asshat and wingnuts on this issue. Now, supposedly Saddam had these weapons and he wasn't afraid to use them on his people, no? Well if he wasn't afraid to gas Kurds (who weren't he people) why wouldn't he use them on troops hellbent on not only driving him from power, but killing him. What kind of a ruthless dictator is he?

And if he's hiding them somewhere else...then what's he waiting for? To re-invade? Summer re-runs? To put with the planes he sent to Iran in 1990 and they never came back?

The wingnuts need this argument in any form they can hang on to as it's the last minute thread of credibility they have to themselves. They'll never admit this war was a fraud cause it means they have been had and are frauds as well.

If he got rid of them, then HE DOESN'T FUCKING HAVE THEM ANYMORE!!!

Is this the best they can spew now? Good.

we just haven't found them yet.

I don't believe her as she is still kinda supportive of Bush.

Blue

"the weapons were moved to syria" everywhere suddenly...

And she has been saying that since the war started...

Egads... does this mean that Bush is eyeing Syria?

Blue

but could also be just a RW talking point to keep * supporters happy and convinced that there were/are WMD.

I wouldn't be surprised if he did start talking about Syria, heck he's got his eyes on Iran. But I bet if he did go to war or tried to go to war with either country, the American people won't put up with it.

Blue

it was about Nukes in the hands of Al Qaida. Remember that. :hi:

Likker-talk, for sure.

Seriously he RESERVES his venom for Clinton, Lady Di and Sister Teresa. Sure I get some of his "ideas" on all of them. But his defending Bush on this makes him look like a loon-because he's really just defending his own position. AND he's suing the Bush admin over spying in conjuction with the ACLU-the article is pretty good in the latest Vanity Fair. He's smart enough to see the real danger the Bush cabal poses and yet he defends this rot.

Every time they are within earshot of a microphone, they just cannot stop themselves from regurgitatin the myth..

at his disposal. No one else knows anything about the weapons. Sounds fictional to me.

...once he knew that Bush was serious about going in.

Bush's fuckup was in actually going in. He'd already won.

PNAC chose its stooge well.

and did you see the military reports out this week that say documents and interviews show that saddam NEVER THOUGHT bush would invade?

fyi

peace

they're in the shed in my backyard. They are great keeping the dandelions down!