Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

$2 trillion to remove Saddam Hussein says Nobel prize-winning economist

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-07-06 02:43 PM
Original message
$2 trillion to remove Saddam Hussein says Nobel prize-winning economist
Edited on Sat Jan-07-06 02:44 PM by bigtree
Iraq war could cost US over $2 trillion, says Nobel prize-winning economist

Saturday January 7, 2006
The Guardian
http://www.guardian.co.uk/international/story/0,,1681078,00.html

The real cost to the US of the Iraq war is likely to be between $1 trillion and $2 trillion (£1.1 trillion), up to 10 times more than previously thought, according to a report written by a Nobel prize-winning economist and a Harvard budget expert.

The study, which expanded on traditional estimates by including such costs as lifetime disability and healthcare for troops injured in the conflict as well as the impact on the American economy, concluded that the US government is continuing to underestimate the cost of the war.

>>>>Mr Stiglitz, a Columbia University professor who won the Nobel prize for economics in 2001, told the Guardian that despite the staggering costs laid out in their paper the economists had erred on the side of caution. "Our estimates are very conservative, and it could be that the final costs will be much higher. And it should be noted they do not include the costs of the conflict to either Iraq or the UK." In 2003, as US and British troops were massing on the Iraq border, Larry Lindsey, George Bush's economic adviser, suggested the costs might reach $200bn. The White House said the figure was far too high, and the deputy defence secretary, Paul Wolfowitz, said Iraq could finance its own reconstruction.

Three years later, with more than 140,000 US soldiers on the ground in Iraq, even the $200bn figure was very low, according to the two economists.


This figure is nothing to the privledged cowboy in the White House who's had everything handed to him. It's not his money. Why should he care? Same with Congress who gave it all up to him. They get to vote for their own salaries and raises. They get to provide each other healthcare.They get thir income supplemented by lobbyists. Why should they care?

Because we will demand they care this November, or get out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Ezlivin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-07-06 02:44 PM
Response to Original message
1. Who do I make the check to?
After all, it's my money they're spending.

Yours, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
no_hypocrisy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-07-06 02:50 PM
Response to Original message
2. We probably could've bribed him to leave for a lot less money.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-07-06 02:56 PM
Response to Original message
3. Oh, well, maybe China will buy a bunch more bonds.
Too bad when they foreclose and we have to pay them with Texas, Alabama, Utah and Wyoming....as partial payment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HysteryDiagnosis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-07-06 03:03 PM
Response to Original message
4. And make him cause more popular than ever... good job. nt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WePurrsevere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-07-06 03:46 PM
Response to Original message
5. "Could" or actually "has"? Rumsfield admits $1 to $2.3 trillion is missing
from Defense Department financial systems and that was from 2002/2003. How much is "missing" now I wonder? How much has gone "missing" to contractors, pay offs, mercenaries, etc in Iraq? These are costs that are not always counted towards official costs and budgets.

Links and more info in an old DU thread (from Dec-31-05) here:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=364&topic_id=4682

Of course to many of us the "cost" that matters most of all is not the money but the lives... of our soldiers, of our allies soldiers, of the people who are there to help, and of course all of the innocent Iraqi men, women and children killed and maimed for life because Bush's LIES and the War for Oil and Bush's revenge.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ladjf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-07-06 04:36 PM
Response to Original message
6. That is not I would call a good return on our investment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 05:34 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC