Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Can you determine money in circulation without ' M3 ' data..?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
AGENDA21 Donating Member (862 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-29-06 04:41 PM
Original message
Can you determine money in circulation without ' M3 ' data..?
Does anyone know...?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
kurth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-29-06 04:56 PM
Response to Original message
1. Not easy
That's why economists and financial analysts are so pissed off. It's great news for the money printers, though. Just keep on printing... There is plenty of paper.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pat_k Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-29-06 04:57 PM
Response to Original message
2. Looks like commercial banks are getting the data required to calculate M3
Edited on Wed Mar-29-06 04:57 PM by pat_k
M3 = M2 + CDs over 100,000 + CDs over 100,000 + deposits of eurodollars and repurchase agreement

From http://www.federalreserve.gov/releases/h6/Current/

Measures of large-denomination time deposits will continue to be published by the Board in the
Flow of Funds Accounts (Z.1 release) on a quarterly basis and in the H.8 release on a weekly
basis (for commercial banks).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zynx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-29-06 05:05 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. It's really not that important of a number.
I follow these matters closely and my father works in the investment industry and this really isn't a big deal. Economic data sets are created, altered, and dismissed all the time. M3 is not the most commonly used or important measure of money supply, though it is the largest. The problem is that it includes numbers that are not influenced by monetary policy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pat_k Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-29-06 05:52 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Does M3 reflect distribution of wealth in some way?
Money mechanics isn't my thing, but other stats that reflect the growning imbalance in the distribution of wealth here seem to be getting buried (e.g., even something as simple as average family income relative to median).

Just wondering if M3 relative to M2/M1 is another statistic that exposes how quickly money is being sucked to the top?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zynx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-29-06 09:11 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Not really, no.
You could argue since it measures larger accounts that if they were growing rapidly wealth would be shifting towards them, but we already know that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pat_k Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-30-06 05:30 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. "We" may know it, but asset hyperinflation and redistribution up the ladde
Edited on Thu Mar-30-06 05:31 PM by pat_k
. . .aren't topics of public debate.

Given the devastating effect on the nation as a whole (e.g., see Asset Hyperinflation), these topics ought to be front and center, but it looks like they are being pushed completely off the radar by burying pertinent statistical measures.

I find it surprising that M3 doesn't tell us much. Money dynamics isn't my thing, but I would have assumed that the flow of investment capital in and out of various large-scale instruments has a substantial impact.

I guess I'm a cynic, but I can't help but think that keeping the M3 numbers from the American public is an attempt to cover up financial shenanigans that do harm to the "little people."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr.Phool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-29-06 05:05 PM
Response to Original message
3. Let' see
Empty out pockets.

A $20, a $10, a $5, and 7 singles and some change.

I'm rich bitch!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 02:26 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC