You know, it took a war and a national crisis before women were welcomed into the workforce. Maybe history will repeat itself and this war will lead to the welcoming of homosexuals into the military?
http://www.dfw.com/mld/dfw/news/14231091.htmTo meet recruiting goals, Army relaxes its rules on tattoos
The Army has a message for the growing legions of flamboyantly tattooed American teens: Uncle Sam even wants you.
Facing one of the worst recruiting climates in the all-volunteer military's history, the Army has decided to relax standards that dictate which parts of a soldier's body can be festooned with body art. Specifically, the service will now accept recruits with tattoos on their neck and hands.
The service has long prohibited soldiers from having tattoos on places that are not covered by a dress uniform. But after missing Army recruiting goals last year, commanders are looking for every way possible to expand the pool of candidates.
Over the past year, the Army has begun accepting more recruits who score poorly on mental aptitude tests and more who don't have high school diplomas. It has begun accepting more candidates with criminal records and histories of drug abuse, and it has experimented with raising the maximum age at which a person can enter the Army.
(more)
The article adds that tattoos which are "extremist, indecent, sexist or racist" are still taboo. In addition, tattoos are only allowed on the back of the neck, a bodily region the Army officially defines as the area "under the ear lobe and across the back of the head."
Whoopee! Now I know. Tattoos are easier than whacking off a toe -- and don't have to be as permanent. Now all I have to do is find the military's definition of what is extremist, indecent, sexist or racist.
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
