Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Personally I do not like employer provided health insurance

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
question everything Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-06-06 12:18 PM
Original message
Personally I do not like employer provided health insurance
First, it ties employees and employers together even when such a tie has long outran its usefulness. Since, as we are getting older and add family members to our policy we also generate "pre existing" conditions that make it harder to apply for a new coverage. And then, of course, there are exciting opportunities at start up companies that cannot afford BMW-style coverage that an established corporation can.

Second, we have no say in type of coverage - and health care providers - that we have. It is our employer who negotiates the contract and often we have to leave a long trusted physician because he is no longer in our "network."

Mostly, for me, is the lack of privacy. An employer can and does request copies of payments by the insurance company. No, it will not detail the treatments or the illness but, say, you live in a community where only one OBGYN provides abortion services. Everyone knows about it. And your employer sees that this OBGYN submitted a claim on behalf of a female member of your family. Is it really your employer's business who you and your family member see? No. But s/he does.

Having said all this, I am glad that MA, and perhaps even CA are forcing employers to offer insurance coverage. Perhaps this will convince more of them to vote for Democrats who push for universal health care.

This is what was so disappointing in the "60 minutes" story about GM. Instead of complaining that cars made in the U.S. - but not Canada and Japan - cost $1400 more each because of GM-provided health care, one would hope that Rick Wagoner would join other corporate presidents to push for universal health care.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
endarkenment Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-06-06 12:22 PM
Response to Original message
1. Me neither and I'm self employed.
It truly sucks. Friggin expensive. Plus I get screwed on rates. UHC would fix this just fine. Medicare for everyone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
democrat_patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-06-06 12:34 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. You've never lived in Canada or England than...

Ask anyone form those countries if they like the UHC. We need to fix what we have, but is UHC the way?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
question everything Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-06-06 12:40 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. I've heard that the French and German systems are good
but, of course, neither joined us to force "democracy" down the throats of the Iraqis
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
endarkenment Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-06-06 01:55 PM
Response to Reply #3
9. Canadians overwhelmingly support UHC
as do the Brits, which is one huge reason why the tories, who underfunded england's healthcare system, were relegated to political obscurity. Glad you brought those cases up.

By the way americans, by over 60%, support UHC.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Inland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-06-06 12:23 PM
Response to Original message
2. Additional points:`
Employer provided insurance usually sucks, as it is part of an ERISA plan and ERISA basically suckerpunches the insured by giving huge discretion to the insurer to decide what is insured under the plan.

Employer provided insurance is a huge tax break, and it needs to be compared to a single payer system.

GM has found it easy to just move a plant across the Detroit River. Seems that socialist Canada provides a better atmosphere for business that a employer insurance tax benefit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Yupster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-06-06 01:22 PM
Response to Original message
5. I'm against employment related health insurance
simply because it ties a universal permanent need (health insurance) to a temporary activity (employment).

That just doesn't make any common sense.

If it's a universal permanent need, then it needs to be provided through a universal permanent body which would be the government.

It will be eventually. It's the only system that really makes sense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skidmore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-06-06 01:26 PM
Response to Original message
6. All I know is that when I lost my job in March, we were sent a
note letting me know that I could pick up COBRA coverage for the dental insurance which I carried. My husband works in the same place I worked and he carries our health insurance. On the table sent to me regarding COBRA coverage, it was noted that we could continue the same coverage for health insurance, if we needed to, for almost $900 per month. We are now living on $1800/mo., with a third of that going to our mortgage. Tell me how we would afford that type of coverage if we had to pick it up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SmokingJacket Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-06-06 01:31 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Yes, COBRA's a joke.
When I was leaving my job to have a baby, I sat down with my hr person to discuss COBRA -- and while I can't remember the numbers now, they were completely ridiculous. Because my husband was self-employed at the time, we ended up getting a high-deductible catastrophic plan -- which was expensive enough.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
question everything Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-06-06 01:48 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. COBRA often has too many bells and whistles that only an
employer can provide - and deduct as expense. For example, we do not always need maternity and pediatrics coverage.

Call your local Blue (Shield, Cross or both), you should be able to pick an individual policy - unless you have "pre-existing" conditions at about $200 a month, with $1000 - $1,500 deductibles.

That's how got out of the employer-provided coverage and stayed as an individual even though both of us went through different employees that offered it.

Good luck!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 04:33 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC