Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

FRIDAY: NYT - "Cheney's Aide Says President Approved Leak"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-06-06 10:15 PM
Original message
FRIDAY: NYT - "Cheney's Aide Says President Approved Leak"
Cheney's Aide Says President Approved Leak
By DAVID JOHNSTON and DAVID E. SANGER
Published: April 7, 2006
WASHINGTON, April 6 — Vice President Dick Cheney's former chief of staff testified that he was authorized by President Bush, through Mr. Cheney, in July 2003 to disclose key parts of what until then was a classified prewar intelligence estimate on Iraq, according to a new court filing.

The testimony by the former official, I. Lewis Libby Jr., cited in a court filing by the government made late Wednesday, provides an indication that Mr. Bush, who has long criticized leaks of secret information as a threat to national security, may have played a direct role in authorizing disclosure of the intelligence report on Iraq.

The disclosure occurred at a moment when the White House was trying to defend itself against accusations that it had inflated the case against Saddam Hussein.

The president has the authority to declassify information, and Mr. Libby indicated in his testimony that he believed Mr. Bush's instructions — which prosecutors said Mr. Libby regarded as "unique in his recollection" — gave him legal cover to talk with a reporter about the intelligence.

Among the key judgments in the report, called a National Intelligence Estimate, was that Saddam Hussein was probably seeking fuel for nuclear weapons.

more at:
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/04/07/washington/07leak.html?hp&ex=1144382400&en=0202d94113819d6b&ei=5094&partner=homepage
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
amitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-06-06 10:19 PM
Response to Original message
1. Oh, la-la....
:bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Flabbergasted Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-06-06 10:24 PM
Response to Original message
2. Yeah!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DURHAM D Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-06-06 10:27 PM
Response to Original message
3. The NY TImes and Washington Post both have stories
tonight stating the Pres can de-classify info at will.

I thought I read several places today that only the agency that classified info can de-classify same.

Can anyone help me with this? Anyone?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
janx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-06-06 10:32 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. The NYT story states that Bush's LAWYER asserts
such a thing:

Mr. Libby testified that he was unsure of his authority to reveal the information before he met Ms. Miller, so he spoke with David Addington, then a lawyer for Mr. Cheney whom Mr. Libby regarded as an expert on national security law.

"Mr. Addington opined that presidential authorization to publicly disclose a document amounted to declassification of the document," the filing by Mr. Fitzgerald said.



We'll have to wait and see.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-06-06 10:33 PM
Response to Original message
5. Something's not adding up....
Cheney already said that he had authority to de-classify information. If he told Libby that Bush told him to put out the info on Plame, Libby would not have the information from the horse's mouth. Maybe Bush told Cheney and maybe he didn't? Would Cheney have the authority if Bush didn't tell him? This all may fall back on Cheney to prove one way or the other what was said. Did Bush tell him to tell Scooter or did he not? Somebody is hiding the truth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lovuian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-06-06 10:47 PM
Response to Original message
6. It doesn't matter declassifying or what They Lied to Fitzgerald
They lied to the public the lied to the press

They call that Obstruction of Justice...

Why LIE if they had the right???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DURHAM D Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-06-06 11:00 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. It seems like a very important point - tonight my local NBC
station reported the story and made the blanket statement that Bush can de-classify anything/anytime he wants to. In other words - this is not a big story - move on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 10:39 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC