Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to Releasing Secret Information

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Montagnard Donating Member (496 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-07-06 07:07 AM
Original message
A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to Releasing Secret Information
Edited on Fri Apr-07-06 07:09 AM by Montagnard
One thing being over looked in the story of Bush’s release of secret information is that the NIE released is the one that contains the information that Bush WAS informed that there was disagreement among the intelligence community over the Iraqi aluminum tubes. You do remember the aluminum tubes that were cited as the Casus Belli for going to war with Iraq. Well, that NIE is the one where Bush was told that the intelligence agencies of the State Department and the Atomic Energy said the tubes could not be used for a nuclear bomb. Even with that knowledge Bush went on to cite the tubes in his State of the Union just prior to war. Later on, his chief apologist, C. Rice stated, Bush was unaware of any disagreement over the tubes prior to his speech.

They cannot even lie good! Just one more day in the land of Supreme Incompetence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Zen Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-07-06 07:12 AM
Response to Original message
1. And the NIE that mentioned a foreign power seeking yellowcake in Niger.
It's makes it pretty damn obvious that this NIE directly relates to Joe Wilson and, to Mrs. Wilson.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
magellan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-07-06 07:12 AM
Response to Original message
2. Good catch!
Where can I see a copy of this NIE, please? I've missed it if it's been linked to hereabouts....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Montagnard Donating Member (496 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-07-06 07:19 AM
Response to Reply #2
8. Not my story
This has been written about two or so weeks ago. Google and you will find. Thanks for the request.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-07-06 07:13 AM
Response to Original message
3. Waas covers his in his article here:


http://news.nationaljournal.com/articles/0406nj1.htm


ADMINISTRATION
Libby Says Bush Authorized Leaks
By Murray Waas, National Journal
© National Journal Group Inc.
Thursday, April 6, 2006

Vice President Dick Cheney's former chief of staff has testified that President Bush authorized him to disclose the contents of a highly classified intelligence assessment to the media to defend the Bush administration's decision to go to war with Iraq, according to papers filed in federal court on Wednesday by Patrick J. Fitzgerald, the special prosecutor in the CIA leak case.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
magellan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-07-06 07:19 AM
Response to Reply #3
7. Thank you (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-07-06 07:14 AM
Response to Original message
4. Further reason for impeachment
It proves that Bush is not capable of running this country.

It proves that he is a liar and cannot be trusted.

IMPEACH - PROSECUTE - INCARCERATE!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClassWarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-07-06 07:15 AM
Response to Original message
5. It's not "incompetence." It's highly-competent criminality.
NGU.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Montagnard Donating Member (496 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-07-06 07:18 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Good correction
You edit is accepted. Thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WiseButAngrySara Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-07-06 07:20 AM
Response to Original message
9. Excellent point! Why isn't this being covered? K & R! ....n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tanyev Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-07-06 07:57 AM
Response to Original message
10. I was impressed to hear Claire Shipman on ABC mention this morning
that they only leaked information from the report that supported their case, even though the report also contained information that did not support their arguments.

But then I was disgusted again when they discussed whether or not the president had the authorization to release classifed information and nobody pointed out that we've been through 3 years of investigation to find the leaker and had promises from the president to fire the leaker. Kind of hard to back up and claim it was a legal, authorized release all along.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-07-06 08:09 AM
Response to Original message
11. Do we not have a copy of this now-declassified document?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Montagnard Donating Member (496 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-07-06 08:14 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. We have selective parts of the NIE Presidential Summary
that was what was declassified.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-07-06 08:32 AM
Response to Reply #12
13. Figures.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-07-06 01:01 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. The NIE was a 90-page document. This is all that was released:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 06:47 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC