Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Study links passive smoking to diabetes for the first time

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
kurth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-07-06 07:15 AM
Original message
Study links passive smoking to diabetes for the first time
Secondhand Smoke Linked to Diabetes Risk
Glucose intolerance seen in smokers and those exposed to their smoke.
By Ed Edelson, HealthDay Reporter

THURSDAY, April 6 (HealthDay News) -- Everyone knows that secondhand smoke is bad for the lungs, but a new study suggests it might also increase the risk of diabetes. The long-term study of more than 4,500 American men and women found the incidence of glucose intolerance -- a precursor to diabetes in which the pancreas can no longer produce enough insulin to regulate blood sugar -- was directly related to exposure to tobacco smoke...

Secondhand smoke could be more dangerous for the pancreas, where insulin is produced, than the fumes inhaled directly by smokers, the researchers said. The toxic substances in secondhand smoke are produced at different temperatures and under different chemical conditions. So some toxins that damage the pancreas might be at even higher concentrations in secondhand smoke than in smoke that is inhaled directly, they said.

That stands to reason, Banzhaf said. "I know that the secondhand smoke is different from, and in many ways more dangerous than, directly inhaled smoke," he said. "It's the difference between a well-ventilated fire in a fireplace and one where there is not enough ventilation to produce proper oxygenation."

If tobacco smoke -- whether secondhand or inhaled directly -- is a risk factor for diabetes, "that would be very important and frightening because of the other trend of increasing obesity," Banzhaf said. "When you put the two together, you have a really deadly combination." Dr. Robert Rizza, president of the American Diabetes Association, said the new study provides "one more reason why it is best not to be exposed to passive smoke." That warning probably applies most urgently to young people, Rizza said. It's possible that there are critical periods in development when toxic substances are more dangerous. So, he added, "the prudent thing is to be sure your children aren't exposed to passive smoke."...

http://www.drkoop.com/newsdetail/93/532000.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-07-06 08:15 AM
Response to Original message
1. allll the smokers i know, not a single diabetes. all people second hand
not a single drop dead lung cancer. since i cant trust anti smokers with fact, i with go with what i am seeing in the real world
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 02:46 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC