Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

cnn now "Leaker in Chief?" good report going on

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-07-06 08:19 AM
Original message
cnn now "Leaker in Chief?" good report going on
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-07-06 08:21 AM
Response to Original message
1. it is their tagline. Also, seems WH has said that since Pres. has authori
ity to declassify information, they did nothing wrong. I am not sure of this as I came late to conversation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-07-06 08:21 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. they also went over the low poll numbers for Bush and Repugs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoYouEverWonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-07-06 08:22 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Then why did Judy Miller
get stuck going to jail?

Why didn't they just say so two years ago?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-07-06 08:26 AM
Response to Reply #1
7. they did something wrong. they were traitors. illegal? that can be
questioned. but it is clear to all to out cia agent and project she was working on cause pissed at husband is WRONG. get it right dudes
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYC Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-07-06 08:28 AM
Response to Reply #1
9. Even if that's true, what was the REASON?
Most certainly it was political, and it was wrong.

Else why would they have tried to cover it up for 4 years and deny it, if it was perfectly OK?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doctor_J Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-07-06 08:23 AM
Response to Original message
4. What about the 8 times he denied doing it?
If it was legal, why did he lie about it 8 times?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-07-06 08:25 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. well, guess those questions await the WH press core. Do you think they
will grill Scotty? I think they just might do so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-07-06 08:26 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. Yeah - Judas only lied THREE TIMES and went down in history.
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dogday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-07-06 08:26 AM
Response to Original message
8. Our Great Leaker and Thief nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lldu Donating Member (272 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-07-06 08:38 AM
Response to Original message
10. Why did they do it secretly?
Why not save taxpayer dollars that had to be spent disproving this?

Why go for so long, if it was the leaker-in-thief all the time? I mean, they are so cocky that it would have been in character for the current regime to just rub it in our faces and then say "Get over it".

Larry L
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-07-06 08:58 AM
Response to Original message
11. If Bush had the authority, HE WOULD HAVE SAID SO!!!!!!!!
WTH is WRONG with people?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 08:50 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC