Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Remember - Cheney claims HE can declassify too.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-07-06 11:10 AM
Original message
Remember - Cheney claims HE can declassify too.
This article might figure into this defense that has been presented by Libby. He was given permission to leak the information. The question is - was it classified. If not - when was it declassified - and who declassified it, right?

In a recent court filing, Special Counsel Patrick Fitzgerald revealed Libby’s assertions to a grand jury that superiors had authorized him to spread sensitive information from a National Intelligence Estimate. The administration used the NIE assessment on Iraq and weapons of mass destruction as part of its justification for going to war.

At the time of Libby’s contacts with reporters in June and July 2003, the administration, including Cheney, who was among the war’s most ardent proponents, faced growing criticism.

No weapons of mass destruction had been found in Iraq, and Bush supporters were anxious to show that the White House had relied on prewar intelligence projecting a strong threat from such weapons.

<snip>
Fitzgerald did not specify which superiors Libby may have been referring to when he testified that higher-ups had authorized him to spread sensitive information.



Transcript from that interview in February

Hume: Let me ask you another question. Is it your view that a Vice President has the authority to declassify information?

Cheney: There is an executive order to that effect.

Hume: There is.

Cheney: Yes.

Hume: Have you done it?

Cheney: Well, I’ve certainly advocated declassification and participated in declassification decisions. The executive order —

Hume: You ever done it unilaterally?

Cheney: I don’t want to get into that. There is an executive order that specifies who has classification authority, and obviously focuses first and foremost on the President, but also includes the Vice President.


So... while we are getting all tripped up in this Bush thing - Libby said that Cheney told him that Bush authorized this leak. But did Cheney declassify it? Or did they change their story to Bush because the Cheney thing wouldn't fly??

On the reality of the Vice President and declassification - The Washington Note looked into this back then, and came up with some great details on that Executive Order mentioned by Cheney in that interview:

Now, let's move to the March 25, 2003 Executive Order by President Bush, No. 13292, that amends President Clinton's Executive Order on National Security Information.

<snip>
Briefly, in the amended Executive Order, Dick Cheney and presumably future VPs are affected by this National Security Information presidential order in the following ways:

1. The Vice President, in the context of his duties, has the authority to "classify" information;

2. The Vice President, in the context of his duties, can give a "top secret" classification to information;

3. The Vice President can give a "secret" or "confidential" classification to information;

4. Like in the previous 1995 Executive Order, the automatic, 25-year declassification of national security information can be preempted if it would impair the ability to "protect" the Vice President from physical harm;

5. Mandatory declassification review (by a designated process) is required of information originating from the Vice President;

6. Mandatory declassification review is required from the Vice President's staff;

7. Access to certain national security information can be provided to individuals who occupied policy-making positions appointed by the Vice President (or President of course)

8. Rules barring access to certain classified national security information will be waived for the Vice President;

9. Waivers to rules of access to classified national security information will only apply to Vice Presidential appointees in areas of their policy work while working as an Executive Branch appointee;

10. This mention of the VP only relates to the above line saying that access to classified national security information will only be provided to Presdidential and Vice Presidential appointees in the area of his or her policy work that was done during the tenure of that respective President or Vice President;

11. "'Original classification authority' means an individual authorized in writing, either by the President, the Vice President in the performance of executive duties. . ." This is a definitional item in the Executive Order.

There is NOTHING HERE that indicates that the Vice President has any embedded authority to be a declassification machine unto himself.


Please note that this order was from MARCH 2003.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Sydnie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-07-06 11:13 AM
Response to Original message
1. Bookmarking for later digestion Thanks! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iamjoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-07-06 11:13 AM
Response to Original message
2. Then Why Didn't They Say That In The First Place?
you know, when news of the leak first came out.

"I did it under my rightful authority as (Vice) President."

Why did they futz around with all that, if it was some one from my administration, they won't work for my administration and sending reporters to jail dreck?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-07-06 11:15 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Personally, I think the defense is playing around with scenarios
and feeling out which will hold the most water.

But I am no legal expert.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Betsy Ross Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-07-06 11:20 AM
Response to Reply #2
7. Because, first and foremost, they are liars.
There is no compulsion to tell the truth. Quite the opposite, they all seem compelled to lie about everything. If you asked them how many stripes were on today's American flag they would go into a discussion of the 15-striped Star Spangled Banner that Francis Scott Key wrote about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rocktivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-07-06 11:22 AM
Response to Reply #2
9. The Bush Oval Office is claiming they can declassify ANYTHING?
Isn't the executive branch restricted to declassifying only what IT classified? Being able to desclassify anything classifed under the legislative or executive branches makes them less than co-equal, doesn't it?

:shrug:
rocknation
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Igel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-07-06 12:04 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. CIA, NSA ...
all executive. Since the executive is, in this regard, unitary, it means that the top dog in the executive has the final say. The EO delegated authority to them, it would seem.

The NIE wasn't issued by part of the legislative branch, although there are laws regulating agents' covert status. Fitz made a distinction between releasing the NIE and leaking Plame's name/status, and I don't see a reason to say he's in error.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rocktivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-07-06 06:17 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. Thanks for taking the time to explain the "fine print" to us "amateurs"
Edited on Fri Apr-07-06 06:35 PM by rocknation
But now that we've established that, why leak it at all? Why not present it as fact as opposed to rumor if Bush didn't do anything wrong? And most important of all, WHY LIE ABOUT IT??? If it was legal to link the information, why "leak" it at all--to fool the enemy?

:headbang:
rocknation

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-07-06 11:17 AM
Response to Original message
4. Then Cheney can produce the Declassification Guide
that declassified all or part of this NIE.

See my desperate plea for a qualified legal opinion on the executive order that covers this here: http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=132&topic_id=2557135&mesg_id=2557135
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-07-06 11:19 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Damn - I wish a qualified attorney would have weighed in
I saw Dean on Countdown, too. Everyone seems to be "looking into it" and "studying that premise" but no one seems to know the answer. You would think that someone from the Clinton White House would pop in on this one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren Stupidity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-07-06 11:21 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. Then please vote my post up so it stays visible.
We do have lawyers here and we should not rely on the VileMedia and their Gang of Experts to do the legal analysis for us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tanyev Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-07-06 11:19 AM
Response to Original message
6. Oh, sure. Anything Bush gets to do, Cheney wants to do it too.
He got to be first in personally shooting someone, though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tridim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-07-06 11:32 AM
Response to Original message
10. In 2008 the new Dem Pres should declassify the JFK assassination files
I'm sure there are many more classified docs that the Republicans don't want exposed. If Bushco gets away with this lame excuse, will a precedent be set?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Igel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-07-06 12:06 PM
Response to Original message
12. But did Cheney make the claim that he declassified the NIE? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-07-06 02:23 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. no - Libby has said that he was given permission to leak it
from Cheney - who said that Bush said okay.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 12:38 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC