Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

EMERGENCY --- By Cindy Sheehan

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-09-06 10:28 PM
Original message
EMERGENCY --- By Cindy Sheehan
Emergency
Submitted by davidswanson on Mon, 2006-04-10 02:19. Cindy Sheehan
By Cindy Sheehan

From a Seymour Hersch article that was posted at www.truthout.org

In recent weeks, the President has quietly initiated a series of talks on plans for Iran with a few key senators and members of Congress, including at least one Democrat. A senior member of the House Appropriations Committee, who did not take part in the meetings but has discussed their content with his colleagues, told me that there had been "no formal briefings," because "they're reluctant to brief the minority. They're doing the Senate, somewhat selectively."

The House member said that no one in the meetings "is really objecting" to the talk of war. "The people they're briefing are the same ones who led the charge on Iraq. At most, questions are raised: How are you going to hit all the sites at once? How are you going to get deep enough?" (Iran is building facilities underground.) "There's no pressure from Congress" not to take military action, the House member added. "The only political pressure is from the guys who want to do it." Speaking of President Bush, the House member said, "The most worrisome thing is that this guy has a messianic vision."

The peace movement has to get cracking on this. Truly, George Bush is obviously out of control and he and the neocons need to be stopped.

http://www.afterdowningstreet.org/?q=node/10020
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Oversea Visitor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-09-06 10:39 PM
Response to Original message
1. Dont worrry never happen
All can keep quiet
All peaceful in bubble
All just walk peacefully into it
Then ask HOW THE HELL DID IT HAPPENED

Oh yeah blame the half of the country that vote for bush
Good plan
Their fault

Just remember to send your children there by pure silence
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sweetheart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-09-06 11:10 PM
Response to Reply #1
8. war because we can
because we do, because it is who we are,
to bomb and destroy at every patience,
distrupting the silent terrorist afar,
cone of echoing silence, chaos' control disgrace.

How the hell did it happen,
its about money in a plutocratic race,
war to grab the power of a billion men,
and do some crimes, democratic loss of face.

900 channels of fat jello mind,
rotting away on couches all across the place,
Uuhh, war is cool, invasion's fine,
underclass imprison the entire human race.
Bushliar stole his cheated little votes,
votefraudster felons no longer idly gloat.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
muriel_volestrangler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-10-06 04:55 AM
Response to Reply #8
12. Exactly what Dick Cheney said
(the "because we can", not the poetry):

Just over three years ago, when I interviewed the Saudi foreign minister, I asked him why he thought the US was determined to invade Iraq.

He said he had put the same question to Vice-President Dick Cheney. Mr Cheney had replied: "Because it's do-able".
...
The US and British troops would be bogged down in Iraq for years. There would be civil war between Sunnis and Shias. The real beneficiary would be the government in Iran.

"And what do the Americans say when you tell them this," I asked? "They don't even listen," he said.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/4894148.stm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wizdum Donating Member (531 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-09-06 10:42 PM
Response to Original message
2. Whoa this is scary...
Dubya is really whacked. They are definitely going to nuke Iran because there is no military strength left with Iraq falling apart to do otherwise. What a bunch of freakazoid losers. God help us all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Steve A Play Donating Member (638 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-09-06 10:42 PM
Response to Original message
3. Kick & Recommend this!
We can't let them get away with this again. :mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lovuian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-09-06 10:44 PM
Response to Original message
4. Cindy... I agree
its WWIII
:nuke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bushies gotta go Donating Member (331 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-09-06 10:51 PM
Response to Original message
5. I've already been e mailing my reps
telling them they need to act now and stop this insanity. I told the rethugs (2) to step out of their partisan blind backing of * and do what they were elected to do: protect us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
me b zola Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-09-06 10:55 PM
Response to Original message
6. Thanks, Cindy
We must put pressure on our representatives to do everything in their power to stop this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bozita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-09-06 11:00 PM
Response to Original message
7. Was Sy Hersh talking about Lieberman?
I read the article in the New Yorker. At the time, I thought of Lieberman.

from above:

"no formal briefings," because "they're reluctant to brief the minority. They're doing the Senate, somewhat selectively."


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tom Joad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-10-06 01:23 AM
Response to Reply #7
11. Or Obama??
Obama would consider missile strikes on Iran
http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/local/chi-0409250111sep25,1,7098310.story?coll=chi-news-hed

Obama went to Conn. to give his whole-hearted support behind the Lieberman war team.
If you support war, you'd supprt Obama. And Lieberman.


If you don't....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
postulater Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-10-06 07:41 AM
Response to Reply #7
13. Surprisingly I heard Russ Feingold say Iran was a serious threat
and no option should be taken off the table because of the overt threat to Israel. He said this at a listening session in Saukville on Saturday.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tigress DEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-09-06 11:47 PM
Response to Original message
9. Saw it coming. August 5, 2005 Haliburton/Iran Connection
The ruling party was really pissed that it had missed its June 2005 deadline for war with Iran. It's still about the oil. There is an area near the Iran/Iraq border that bushits want.

This Haliburton assistance came after a scientific study revealed that Iran was 10 years away from nuclear capability. So like a good traitor Haliburton was there to pump up Iran to a credible threat. What I don't get is how this story got squashed and what happened to the 17 separate criminal investigations on Haliburton that were going on at that time.

Other than Fitzgerald, I guess all other prosecutors got vaporized or the people above them changed to someone who play ball.


The url address of this article is: http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=viewArticle&code=LEO20050805&articleId=806

Halliburton Secretly Doing Business with Key Member of Iran’s Nuclear Team

by Jason Leopold

August 5, 2005
GlobalResearch.ca

<snip>
Scandal-plagued Halliburton, the oil services company once headed by Vice President Dick was secretly working with one of Iran’s top nuclear scientists on natural gas related projects and, allegedly, selling the scientists’ oil company key components for a nuclear reactor, according to Halliburton sources with intimate knowledge of both companies’ business dealings.

Just last week a National Security Council report said Iran was a decade away from acquiring a nuclear bomb. That time frame could arguably have been significantly longer if Halliburton, which just reported a 284 percent increase in its fourth quarter profits due to its Iraq reconstruction contracts, was not actively providing the Iranian government with the financial means to build a nuclear weapon.

Now comes word that Halliburton, which has a long history of flouting U.S. law by conducting business with countries the Bush administration said has ties to terrorism, was working with Cyrus Nasseri, the vice chairman of Oriental Oil Kish, one of Iran’s largest private oil companies, on oil development projects in Tehran. Nasseri is also a key member of Iran’s nuclear development team.

“Nasseri, a senior Iranian diplomat negotiating with Europe over Iran's controversial nuclear program is at the heart of deals with US energy companies to develop the country's oil industry”, the Financial Times reported. Nasseri was interrogated by Iranian authorities in late July for allegedly providing Halliburton with Iran’s nuclear secrets and accepting as much as $1 million in bribes from Halliburton, according to Iranian government officials.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paul_fromatlanta Donating Member (545 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-10-06 12:28 AM
Response to Original message
10. The people debating pulling out of Iraq are missing the point - that is
not under consideration. The question is war with Iran. All the same signs are there that preceded Afghanistan and Iraq.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Radio_Guy Donating Member (875 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-10-06 08:47 AM
Response to Reply #10
15. But it should be under consideration
We need to pull our troops out of Iraq and Afghanistan and leave Iran alone to live in peace. Like Iraq, Iran is no threat to us. Those people have every right to live in peace and not have six-figure deaths like we gave Iraq.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paul_fromatlanta Donating Member (545 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-11-06 01:02 PM
Response to Reply #15
21. Did you see newt Gingrich's speech - he suggests a draw down but not withd
withdrawal.

>>VERMILLION - Newt Gingrich, the former Republican Speaker of the House, told students and faculty at the University of South Dakota Monday that the United States should pull out of Iraq and leave a small force there, just as it did post-war in Korea and Germany.

"It was an enormous mistake for us to try to occupy that country after June of 2003," Gingrich said during a question-and-answer session at the school. "We have to pull back, and we have to recognize it."
<<
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-10-06 08:50 AM
Response to Reply #10
17. Iran was a strategic positioning for what is to come.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paul_fromatlanta Donating Member (545 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-10-06 10:32 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. What do you think comes after Iran - that is not clear to me
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-11-06 08:37 AM
Response to Reply #19
20. Well America will not survive economically. We are already floundering.
5.9 billion a month down the crapper in Iraq is just a smidgeon of the financial nightmare for Iran.
Postponing the inevitable transition from an oil based economy to a different form of energy won't be postponed with this move, as the landscape would be so transformed that recovery of the oil goal would be so difficult that it would not be feasible. America's pants are down. We need to pull them up and realize that we are behind the energy eight ball by about 30 years because no one payed attention to the previous oil crisis. Instead of conserving at that time and looking for a way out, everyone bought SUVs and a bigger house. After Iran? That's a good question. I do not have an answer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PuraVidaDreamin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-10-06 08:44 AM
Response to Original message
14. We shouldn't do anything until after the November elections
:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-10-06 08:49 AM
Response to Reply #14
16. Hey dolly! Wars and rumors of wars.
Keep fighting!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seemslikeadream Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-11-06 01:07 PM
Response to Reply #16
22. And the rumors of war

Until the philosophy,
Which holds one race superior
And another inferior,
Is finally and permanently
Discredited and abandoned,
Everywhere is war.

WAR

Until there is no longer first class
Or second class citizens of any nation.
Until the color of a man's skin,
Is of no more significance than
The color of his eyes,
I've got to say "war".

WAR

That until the basic human rights,
Are equally guaranteed to all,
Without regard to race,
I'll say "war"

Until that day the dream of lasting peace,
World-citizenship and the rule of
International morality will remain
Just a fleeting illusion to be pursued,
But never obtained.
And everywhere is war.

Until the ignoble and unhappy regime
Which holds all of us through,
Child-abuse, yeah, child-abuse yeah,
Sub-human bondage has been toppled,
Utterly destroyed,
Everywhere is war.

War in the east,
War in the west,
War up north,
War down south,
There is war,
And the rumors of war.

Until that day,
the african continent will know no peace
There is no continent,
Which will know peace.

Children, children.

Fight!

We find it necessary.
We know we will win.
We have confidence in the victory
Of good over evil
Of good over evil

Fight the real enemy!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-10-06 08:54 AM
Response to Original message
18. Their idea is to have the entire middle east in civil war, they kill each
other off and many of our low income expendable people. Then the richies move in and take their oil.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 08:13 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC