Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Gingrich Criticizes Bush, Aids Enemy

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Sapphire Blue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 08:37 AM
Original message
Gingrich Criticizes Bush, Aids Enemy
Gingrich Criticizes Bush, Aids Enemy
By Glenn Greenwald, AlterNet. Posted April 12, 2006.

(excerpt)

Beyond the unsurprising fact that Bush followers are revealing themselves to be soulless and disloyal now that their hero has fallen, the more important revelation is that they have built a framework in our country ever since 9/11 where dissent from the commander was all but prohibited by the noxious equation of criticism with treason. All of the far-too-late criticisms which people like Gingrich, Conway and so many others are suddenly so eager to voice, have been off-limits for years now as a result of the precept -- spread by people like them -- that the president is not our public servant, but instead, is our commander-in-chief fighting a war in which our very survival is at stake, and to criticize him or oppose his efforts is, to use Gingrich's formulation, to give "a great deal of comfort" to the terrorists.

Indeed, responding to criticisms of his policies in Iraq, the president himself "demand a debate that brings credit to our democracy -- not comfort to our adversaries." Debates over what we should do now in order to win are acceptable, but condemnations of the president for things done in the past or which call into question the value of the troops' efforts (Gingrich: "It was an enormous mistake for us to try to occupy that country after June of 2003") are treasonous. Following that logic, Zell Miller angrily stood before the nation at the Republican National Convention and described the 2004 presidential election this way: "ur nation is being torn apart and made weaker because of the Democrats' manic obsession to bring down our commander-in-chief." The same logic led Michael Reagan to demand when Howard Dean questioned whether we can win in Iraq that Dean "should be hung." This is the dissent-prohibiting climate in which our country has been wallowing essentially since 9/11.

Presidents have pursued misguided policies before, and surely will again. But one of the self-corrective features of a democracy is that open, aggressive criticism of our leaders enable those mistakes to be exposed, realized and corrected. We have been without that self-corrective capacity for the last five years, thanks to Bush followers who insisted that not only is the president right, but that truly patriotic Americans will refrain from criticizing his policies in any way, because the criticism itself is tantamount to helping the enemy. And so we have collectively pursued disastrous policies, and tolerated patently illegal conduct, because the conventional wisdom emerged that it was preferable, and more patriotic, to keep quiet about our government's actions than to speak out and point out what was obvious for quite some time now -- namely, all of the criticisms which long-time Bush supporters are suddenly voicing as though they believed them all along.

The greatest evil of the last five years isn't that our government pursued disastrous and illegal policies, it's that the administration and its supporters attempted to immunize themselves from criticism for those actions, thus depriving our democracy of its greatest strength. To watch the people responsible for that dissent-quashing now stand up and voice the very criticisms they've long equated with treason is far too infuriating to celebrate. It is important to ensure that the people responsible for the indescribable mess our country is in on so many levels not be allowed to extricate themselves from responsibility. There has been one political faction that has run every part of our country for the last five years, and they are responsible for everything that has happened. We know who they are, and it is critically important that they not be permitted to play-act as a legitimate opposition.


Glenn Greenwald is a constitutional law attorney and chief blogger at Unclaimed Territory. His forthcoming book, How Would a Patriot Act: Defending American Values from a President Run Amok will be released by Working Assets Publishing next month.

http://www.alternet.org/waroniraq/34878/


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
billybob537 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 08:41 AM
Response to Original message
1. The death spiral has begun
Seperate yourself from Bush if you don't want to sucked down in his whirlpool of evil profiteering.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msgadget Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 08:56 AM
Response to Original message
2. Gingrich is an opportunist
he wrote a fantastic editorial in the WSJ back in February, I think. If I wasn't so familiar with him I'd have believed it. He's wise enough to realize they've turned off a lot of moderate republicans. Wonder if there'll be a new word list...


Great link, thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
npincus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 09:08 AM
Response to Original message
3. Remember this?
Edited on Thu Apr-13-06 09:09 AM by npincus
Classic.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 09:16 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Classic.
Thanks!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
npincus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 09:20 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. here's the corresponding article:
Edited on Thu Apr-13-06 09:22 AM by npincus
http://www.cnn.com/US/9511/debt_limit/11-16/gingrich_pm/

Republicans voted 231-173 to stop Democrats from bringing the blowups into the chamber. They said it was against House rules to call the speaker a "cry-baby," and said Democrats were just trying to divert attention from Clinton's inability to balance the budget.

Against House Rules to call Gingrich a crybaby! har har

I bought that Daily News as a keepsake... only I don't know where it is anymore!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 03:04 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC