Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

RAF war objector jailed for eight months!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
AGENDA21 Donating Member (862 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 01:30 PM
Original message
RAF war objector jailed for eight months!
An RAF doctor who refused to serve in Iraq because he thought that the war was illegal has been sentenced to eight months in prison.

Flight Lieutenant Dr Malcolm Kendall-Smith, 37, was also dismissed from the RAF by a panel of fellow officers after he was found guilty of disobeying five lawful orders for refusing to travel in Basra last year.

Snip...

Today, his solicitor, Justin Hugheston-Roberts, said that the airman, the first officer charged with disobeying orders in Iraq, was "clearly upset" by the verdict but determined to bring an appeal.

Snip..

"Obedience of orders is at the heart of any disciplined force. Disobedience of orders means it is not a disciplined force, it is a disorganised rabble," said the judge. "Those who wear the Queen’s uniform cannot pick and choose which orders they obey and those who do so must face the consequences."

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,2-2132974,00.html

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Kagemusha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 01:32 PM
Response to Original message
1. In other words, the Nuremburg Defense is back.
All that's required is the confidence that only the losers end up at Nuremburgs is necessary to ensure that similar results occur if orders to commit foul deeds are ever issued.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 01:35 PM
Response to Original message
2. That's a shame. What about disobeying illegal orders?
..."Those who wear the Queen’s uniform cannot pick and choose which orders they obey and those who do so must face the consequences."...

Even if those orders are illegal?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vetinarii Donating Member (32 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 01:50 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. The hard part is proving that the orders are illegal
The judge in this case ruled that he wasn't going to listen to arguments on this subject.

He was very insistent that he wasn't going to let the court be used as a platform for political "grandstanding".

Personally, I think the defense counsel missed their cue here. The issue should be whether the defendant has a reasonably founded belief that the orders are illegal, and the court could have heard arguments on this subject without having to rule on the war itself. But I haven't looked at the transcripts, so I don't know whether they tried this, or whether it would have made any difference if they had.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NYC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 01:53 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. The defendant said he needed to argue his case,
but the judge refused, calling it grandstanding.

That effectively eliminates the illegal order defense. So, do all soldiers have to obey all illegal orders because they now have no defense?

I suspect so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AGENDA21 Donating Member (862 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 01:57 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. More info here..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
400Years Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 01:41 PM
Response to Original message
3. I would rather sit in jail than sit in hell
8 months as opposed to being sent to a hell hole for a lie?

No problem.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 01:47 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC