Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Field & Stream Mag Attacks Bush's Environmental Policies

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 03:53 PM
Original message
Field & Stream Mag Attacks Bush's Environmental Policies
Field & Stream Mag Attacks Bush's Environmental Policies
by JPZenger
Thu Apr 13, 2006 at 11:56:19 AM PDT

A major article by a columnist in Field and Stream Magazine attacks the Bush Administration policies for their effects on hunting and fishing.

http://www.fieldandstream.com/...

Here's an excerpt:

"...the policy has prioritized drilling over other uses on federal lands, while relegating long-standing conservation mandates from the 1960s and '70s to the back burner. For example, in Wyoming, Montana, Utah, Colorado, and New Mexico, the Bureau of Land Management has approved over 75 percent of the energy industry's applications for exemptions to work in critical winter range, heretofore closed to protect wildlife--sage grouse, mule deer, and pronghorns, in particular (the Federal Land Policy Management Act of 1976 gave agencies the means to close critical habitat). The BLM has also continued to issue drilling leases while in the process of writing new resource management plans that still await public comment. In addition, the Bush administration is working hard to eliminate Wilderness Study areas--set aside for their scenic value as well as their importance to wildlife. Most disturbingly, Congress is now debating a national energy bill that would codify the policy ...

The results of these actions--billed as promoting national energy security--have begun to turn vast tracts of the western United States into industrial landscapes. The winners are the energy companies, which have been able to acquire their leases for as little as $2 per acre. The casualties are big game, upland birds, cold- and warmwater fisheries, the traditional interests of hunters and anglers, and the economic welfare of communities whose livelihoods are based on outdoor recreation and ranching. The Powder River Basin in northeastern Wyoming and southeastern Montana--approximately 13 million acres of prairie, escarpments, and mountains--provides the starkest example of how the Bush administration's unbridled energy policy is running roughshod over our public lands. The BLM's final environmental impact statement for the area calls for about 66,000 new coalbed methane (CBM) wells (about 14,000 have already been drilled in Wyoming; several hundred in Montana), 26,000 miles of new roads, and 52,000 miles of new pipelines.

more at:
http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2006/4/13/145619/675
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
xultar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 03:57 PM
Response to Original message
1. OK it is official. The tide is turning.
Edited on Thu Apr-13-06 03:58 PM by xultar
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DUHandle Donating Member (580 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 03:59 PM
Response to Original message
2. Not so fast
Edited on Thu Apr-13-06 04:02 PM by DUHandle
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pscot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 04:43 PM
Response to Original message
3. Pretty gutsy stuff
for this particular magazine. I'm sure it will make a lot of their readers mad as hell.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jmowreader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 09:00 PM
Response to Original message
4. Hunters and fishers are two groups we REALLY would do well to approach
There is one immutable requirement for all hunters and all fishers.

WILDLIFE.

If there's no wildlife there's no reason to go out in the woods looking for it.

If there are no fish there is no reason to go to the water.

There's lots of dissing of hunters and fishers among the left...this is the wrong way to go. The Bush administration is the ENEMY of everyone who uses wildlife--whether to hunt them or just to look at them in their natural habitats. These people know this. Why aren't we welcoming them?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
against all enemies Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-13-06 09:06 PM
Response to Original message
5. Don't get to optimistic. I visit a fishing website and these assholes
still think Bush is the greatest. It's god damn depressing. They aren't bright enough to understand. If you want to know who belongs in that 38% that still think Bush is doing a good job, look no further than your hunters and fishers. Why do you think they like to fish so much? Something to outsmart. And I do fish, makes me ill to think about my pears.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 09:26 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC