Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Something I Disagree With Randi About---That She Keeps Repeating

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
journalist3072 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-19-06 09:05 PM
Original message
Something I Disagree With Randi About---That She Keeps Repeating
So as I was listening to Randi on the way home today, she was taking a caller to task for saying the Democrats need to get their act together.

Randi said she's sick of people saying the Dems need to get their act together. That the Dems have no power, and it's the Republicans who need to get THEIR act together.

I just disagree with Randi wholeheartedly with this.

Just because the Dems don't have any power (i.e. subpoena power, etc) does not absolve them of certain responsibilities.

For example, I truly believe the Dems need to be putting together their own version of a Contract with American. Something that says to the American people "this is what we'll do if you give us back control of Congress."

I've said it before and I'll say it again. The American people already understand and "get" that George Bush is a bad man. Just look at his approval rating.

But I think they also want to know from the Dems: what do you offer us in return?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MadMaddie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-19-06 09:07 PM
Response to Original message
1. I agree with you but we need to get away from
"Contract with America" this terminology and anything close to it has negative vibes....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
journalist3072 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-19-06 09:13 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Here's my humble take on that
Speaking from a policy perspective, the Contract with America was a bad document. The policies it was championing were bad for America.

Strategically however, I think it was brilliant.

Because it allowed the Republicans to get their message out, at a time when they didn't have the White House Rose Garden as their backdrop. They didn't have the automatic bulley pullpit that comes with the Presidency.

And so the Contract With America allowed them to get on message and say 'this is what we'll do for you.'

That has been my problem with the Democrats since January 2001---they have shown they don't know how to be an effective opposition party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SharonAnn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-19-06 09:21 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. It came out so late, it actually had little effect on the election.
There was little time and the GOP wasn't really able to develop a media blitz about it before the election. If you think back, we really heard about it's supposed importance AFTER the election when the GOP spun it to say that was why they'd accomplished such an upset.

Sort of like how they said that religious values voters turned the election tide for the last presidential election. Simply not true.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadMaddie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-19-06 09:24 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. I can agree with that...
One of the things I find frustrating is why hasn't the Dem party gathered together some of the best...not average...but the best marketing and advertising people in our Democratic population and created an effective quick response communication machine....We have the creative people to do it....

but they are stuck in their tired old...lets do what we have been doing for the last 20 years...

Dean is making some changes....and they are good changes..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Justice Is Comin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-19-06 09:31 PM
Response to Reply #9
13. Yeah the same
tired old words; change, we can do better. Ughh. And the leaders in both houses couldn't be less invigorating if they were on Valium.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rooney Donating Member (251 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-19-06 09:10 PM
Response to Original message
2. impeachment
It is my opinion that the election for the house and senate should be won by them vowing to impeach George and Dick both. Therefore , we would have the 3rd person in line (Hastart?) to be president for two years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jack Rabbit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-19-06 09:14 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. Should the Deomocrats win control of the House
Edited on Wed Apr-19-06 09:37 PM by Jack Rabbit
Nancy Pelosi will become Speaker. Should Bush and Cheney be impeached and convicted, as they should, she will become President of the United States.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
helderheid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-19-06 09:28 PM
Response to Reply #7
12. Holy CRAP. I got it! I was confused in the other thread but
WOOOOOOOOOOOOOHOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alamom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-19-06 09:51 PM
Response to Reply #12
15. Same here, (confused no more) woooooohooooo, toooooo!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
helderheid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-19-06 10:01 PM
Response to Reply #15
19. Now THAT is something to celebrate!!!!!! We gotta get around Diebold for
the 1st woman president in 2007!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newyawker99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-20-06 09:23 AM
Response to Reply #2
22. Hi rooney!!
Welcome to DU!! :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zen Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-19-06 09:12 PM
Response to Original message
3. What SHOULD the Democrats offer? A house cleaning.
A house cleaning throughout the government after the 2008 election, especially. Til then, Democrats can only do damage control on Bush.

When the Democrats get back the Congress, they need to sweep it clean and change the permanent rules on such things as ethics, lobbying, fundraising, etc.

Then they should investigate the hell out of how the regime has broken laws and usurped the Constitution.

After 2008, a new Dem Administration has to clean house in the Defense Dept., the State Dept. and ESPECIALLY the Justice Department. All the Washington bureaus need to be cleaned out and the crimes of the past officials prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadMaddie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-19-06 09:27 PM
Response to Reply #3
11. Not only a house cleaning but cleaning up of every gov
organization that the Repugs have put political cronies in...

The Democrat message should be something like

The Dems will replace political hacks with Professionals (Fema, FCC,FDA,) all organizations.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ellenfl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-19-06 09:13 PM
Response to Original message
5. they did . . .
Edited on Wed Apr-19-06 09:16 PM by ellenfl
I truly believe the Dems need to be putting together their own version of a Contract with American.


it didn't get any airplay. besides, i believe they may be waiting until they get closer to november so the swift boating of them will be held to a minimum. btw, dems have always had a message. it's about fairness and inclusion. none of that has changed except that lots of people . . . on the right and the left . . . keep saying we don't stand for anything. we do.

ellen fl
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jigarotta Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-19-06 09:14 PM
Response to Original message
6. they could have backed McKinney.
One of the few beacons of free speech in congress allowed and she was ditched.
How shameful. How curious.

Dems offer NOTHING but a spark here and there to keep the fools still trusting. One party system, same corp donaters, same blackmailers.

Repugs: 10 of them beating up on a kid just for fun or his lunch money.
Dems: Witnessing it and not really giving a shit, hey, that's the way the world works. people just don't understand...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mandate My Ass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-20-06 09:28 AM
Response to Reply #6
23. I know
Every time somebody makes a principled stand, the sound of crickets is the only thing that can be heard from the dem leadership.

Stand up with Murtha, Feingold, especially McKinney and Conyers who's digging up juicy stuff.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NRaleighLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-19-06 09:26 PM
Response to Original message
10. I agree only partially - the Dems have been fighting the media,
as well as being the minority. They've had plenty of clear messages, but the media at large ignores it. (just look at the ratio of right to left on pretty much all talking heads sessions).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cynatnite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-19-06 09:33 PM
Response to Original message
14. The last thing Dems should do is a 'contract with america'.
:puke:

The repukes did that and it would be copying them. The repukes would say 'the dems are so bad off they're stealing our ideas'.

Besides, I dumped the repuke party over their damn contract idiocy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlCzervik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-19-06 09:54 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. i don't think the Dem's have to be offering up a whole lot in the mid
terms except to say "the gop is the proven party of corruption" but they will have to offer something concrete in the next presidential election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ksec Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-19-06 09:57 PM
Response to Original message
17. I think the plan is to sit back and watch them disintregrate
I dont think this is a good idea, but it is an effective one. All one needs to do is look at the polls and look at how the repukes have quickly become a party in real peril. One with no direction, no unity and no plans to fix those things they brought with them(wars, deficits, outsourcing ,ruined american credibility,etc)

So why mess with success?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
moondust Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-19-06 09:59 PM
Response to Original message
18. Silence as strategy.
I believe the main reason Dumya's Social Security Fiasco failed is because the Dems got smart and did not publicly offer a plan of their own that the Pukes could attack and destroy. The Pukes "win" things by destroying their only rival.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-19-06 10:01 PM
Response to Original message
20. For fucks sake, they HAVE
It's on the DNC site. Tons of Democrats have spoken regarding the Democratic agenda, on both home issues and national security. Randi is exactly right and if you don't know what Democrats plan to do, then you're just not paying attention.

I am with Randi, I am SICK of people bitching about Democrats. The truth of the matter is that too many lefties were on board for some wild revolution and are going to have to settle for the mundane work of talking to their neighbors about education, outsourcing, health care, and the defense budget. Boorrring.

So sad, too bad. If you don't like it, go back to playing Doom.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imagevision Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-19-06 10:21 PM
Response to Original message
21. Perhaps some Dem Senators need to be replaced, Liebermann for example!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 08:49 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC