Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Archives Pledges to End Secret Agreements [... w/fed agencies.. CIA, etc]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
WePurrsevere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-20-06 08:04 AM
Original message
Archives Pledges to End Secret Agreements [... w/fed agencies.. CIA, etc]
Full article here:

The National Archives will no longer enter into secret agreements with federal agencies that want to withdraw records from public access on Archives shelves and will do more to disclose when documents are removed for national security reasons.

<snip>

Allen Weinstein, the archivist of the United States, announced the policy change yesterday after the release of a second secret classified memorandum, this one between the CIA and the Archives. In it Archives officials agreed in 2001 to conceal official CIA efforts to withdraw thousands of historical documents from the Archives, even though the records had been declassified.

<snip>

Independent historian Matthew M. Aid uncovered the reclassification program last summer when his requests for formerly available documents were delayed or denied. In February, the Archives acknowledged that about 9,500 records totaling more than 55,000 pages had been withdrawn and reclassified as secret since 1999.

<snip>

Nevertheless, the Archives' decision to shun secret agreements is a step forward, said Thomas S. Blanton, executive director of the National Security Archive, a nonprofit research library in Washington. "For the National Archives to go into cahoots with the CIA and Air Force to mislead researchers about what was going on was over the top, and a strong signal of a secrecy system that is genuinely broken," he said.


Apparently this started during Clinton because there was a concern about some documents being improperly released to the public that should not have been. BushCo then took it up to a new level of hiding declassified info from researchers and the public. :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Media_Lies_Daily Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-20-06 08:09 AM
Response to Original message
1. I'd have to see something definitive that this practice started....
...under Clinton. If you'll recall, Clinton was responsible for releasing thousands of pages of previously classified information connected to the JFK assassination.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WePurrsevere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-20-06 08:39 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. From what I read it doesn't sound like Clinton pulled records for any
dubious purpose. From what I understood the article to say was that the only reason Clinton did so at all was simply to rectify an error made in declassifying a few records that should not have been. This would be consistent with his track record of having a rather open style of government (as you mentioned).

OTOH it sounds like BushCo took it to a new level of secrecy in actually removing and reclassifying records that had been available to researchers and the public for a while. (Possibly removing things about his father's admin, etc?) This type of behavior is consisent with BushCo's track record of secrecy and downright paranoia.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 02:37 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC