Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Study reveals huge U.S. oil-shale field

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
TX-RAT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-20-06 01:20 PM
Original message
Study reveals huge U.S. oil-shale field
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
BrklynLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-20-06 01:22 PM
Response to Original message
1. Uh-oh There goes the neighborhood.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadHound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-20-06 01:23 PM
Response to Original message
2. That's nice and all, but rather than resorting to high priced oil
That requires almost as much energy to extract the oil as the energy it produces, along with destroying the surrounding enviroment getting the shale out of the ground, why not switch to clean, renewable alternatives like wind energy, diesel hybrids, and biodiesel.

This is just another sign that Peak Oil has occurred, and we're on the downhill slope.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LaPera Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-20-06 01:39 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. Government subsidies (corporate welfare w/ our tax $$$) will make it
profitable all the way around for the oil companies, as we will continue to pay the high gas prices and the tonic clean-up and pollution cost...

OH YEAH, "IT WILL HELP STOP OUR DEPENDENCE ON FOREIGN OIL"

Where have we heard that before?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClintonTyree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-20-06 01:25 PM
Response to Original message
3. See, there's no need for alternative fuels.........
after we've sucked the Middle East dry we'll start on this! It will most certainly be an environmental disaster, but we'll have plenty of fuel for our Hummers and Jet Skis! We just have to get our priorities straight, that's all. :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-20-06 01:32 PM
Response to Original message
4. I love this "reveals" shit
Everyone knows that there are shale fields and weakass wells all over the place. It's just that the cost of extraction was always greater than the profit. Now that the price of a barrel is through the roof, a lot of these once unprofitable assets are getting a second look.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TX-RAT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-20-06 04:12 PM
Response to Reply #4
10. yep
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dipsydoodle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-20-06 01:36 PM
Response to Original message
5. Sounds to me
like an environmental nightmare.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ramapo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-20-06 01:45 PM
Response to Original message
7. Can't get any uglier....
The process for extracting oil from shale makes current coal mining techniques, which destroy whole landscapes, look environmentally friendly.

Then there's the question of whether or not there is even a net energy gain.

This is bad, bad stuff....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NickB79 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-20-06 01:53 PM
Response to Original message
8. Nice, it's in Utah, Colorado and Wyoming
The process of oil shale extraction requires huge amounts of water and natural gas to extract the oil. The natural gas is needed to cook the oil out of the rock, and the water is required to flush the cooked oil out.

Natural gas supplies in North America are already starting to decline, and water is in short supply in the US Southwest, such as Utah. Good luck extracting that oil anytime soon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OneBlueSky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Apr-20-06 02:23 PM
Response to Original message
9. won't going after shale oil in a big way result in the same . . .
kind of thing that happened to West Virginia with coal? . . . not a pretty sight, to be sure . . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 07:45 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC