Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

At what point did 'fundie Christian = Repub' brand naming happen?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
Mayberry Machiavelli Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-21-06 10:44 PM
Original message
At what point did 'fundie Christian = Repub' brand naming happen?
When Carter ran for president, it didn't seem outlandish or unusual that a devout Christian, a Baptist from the South, would be a Democrat, or would be any less likely to be a Democrat than a Republican (at least to me).

Was it Falwell and the Moral Majority in the 80's, and their alliance with the Reagan crew? Then subsequently cemented by the current mafiosi?

And was there any identification of the antiabortion zealots as Republicans prior to the 80's?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
PublicWrath Donating Member (597 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-21-06 11:10 PM
Response to Original message
1. somebody who worked for Goldwater's unsuccessful campaign came
up with the idea, (not for Goldwater), but the guy did a great deal to merge fundies and Repubs later on. Theocracy Watch has a lot on this subject. "The Rise of Dominionism" can be viewed on their site, and I highly recommend it. It'll scare the hell out of you.

www.theocracywatch.com
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mayberry Machiavelli Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-21-06 11:12 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Thanks... will check it out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Erika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-21-06 11:13 PM
Response to Original message
3. W is responsible for turning the GOP into the religious party
As noted by CNN tonight. His statement that Christ was his greatest philosopher started it. Then he has systematically ripped away at the separation between Church and State. He's gotten so extreme with his social theocracy that even the Southern Baptists are backing away from him.

His background of a spoiled frat brat, a drunken partier, and getting DUI's was attractive to the Falwell/Robertson group when he claimed to be "born again".

He has done harm. I've told the religious factions I normally donate to, that I will no longer do so since W is now taking it out of my taxes, without giving me a choice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
American Tragedy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-21-06 11:34 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. I always found that answer by Bush very, very telling.
He said specifically that Jesus was his favorite political philosopher. Now, think about what disturbingly erroneous interpretation is implied in that statement.

Ironically, it seems to me that was at least in part how Jesus was so misperceived by the Romans and Pharisees.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ChristianLibrul Donating Member (218 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-21-06 11:14 PM
Response to Original message
4. Yes
The ultracancervative denominations have always been republicans. Baptists, Church of Christ, Church of God, Nazarene and their ilk have always existed because of what they were against more than what they were-and are-for. They were always against "sinful movie stars" and blacks. They were always against letting women wear pants in public or working, for that matter. To this day, women are officially second-class citizens in their churches. They cook for Sunday and Wednesday night church suppers, teach kids in Sunday School and play piano/organ for worship services, but don't pray in church or vote on important matters. Stuff like that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Erika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-21-06 11:20 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. I have told at least 2 of that group that I won't donate
since W is taking it forcefully from my taxes. They react like they were in shock.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mayberry Machiavelli Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-21-06 11:46 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. I don't think your information is correct. Are you trying to say that
Baptists in the South voted Republican during the 50's and early 60's? Back when Strom Thurmond was a Democrat?

That doesn't seem to square with what I've read.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coastie for Truth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-22-06 12:05 AM
Response to Reply #4
12. The RW Evangelicals were always a small group
But the LW Evangelicals (yes they existed) were a major factor ("the" major factor? - maybe) in the 1960's anti-war and civil rights movements (see note 1). I think Roe v. Wade was a major re-aligning factor.

It looks to me from my isolated POV that the RW people of faith have vastly overplayed the Roe v. Wade hand with respect to stem cell research. We are seeing people of faith (not from the RW) saying that stem cell research is "pro life."

It all depends who translated your translation of Scripture, and the particular twist your community puts on the mis-translations.

_______________

Note 1. I was there. I am 65 and was a veteran of those days.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-21-06 11:20 PM
Response to Original message
5. "Our steeple is bigger than their steeple."
I saw it as a backlash to MLK/Jackson/Carter, becoming visible with Reagan/Bush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-21-06 11:37 PM
Response to Original message
8. There is a great piece on this:
**quote**
The fundamentalist takeover of the Southern Baptist Convention began at a meeting in Houston, Texas in 1979. From the beginning voting irregularities accompanied the takeover. (John Baugh, the Baptist layman who founded Sysco Corp., calls it "Voting Fraud" -- see his Battle for Baptist Integrity, p. 95)
The chief architect of the SBC takeover was Houston appellate court judge Paul Pressler who meticulously reviewed the Convention's Constitution and By-laws and crafted the strategy for the takeover. Yet, in 1979, Pressler himself registered and voted at the Convention's annual meeting in violation of the SBC's Constitution. Pressler registered as a messenger (delegate) from a church in which he was not a member (the ecclesial equivalent to the recent vote fraud felony Ann Coulter allegedly committed when she voted at a precinct in which she did not live).
**endquote**
http://www.talk2action.org/story/2006/2/17/164644/502

On the face of it, this seems like just an in-church thing, but the story is bigger than that. I believe it was Paul Weyrich, a hardrightie powerhouse for decades, that originally determined that it would be a good idea 'to go after' conservative churchgoers. He reportedly targeted Southern Baptists and members of the Assemblies of God.

Read about 'Mainstream Baptist' on the Talk-to-Action website; he is a very cool and knowledgeable person.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PublicWrath Donating Member (597 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-21-06 11:52 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. That's him. Worked for Goldwater. I couldn't think of his name, n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PassingFair Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-21-06 11:48 PM
Response to Original message
10. Two words:
Talk Radio
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 09:54 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC