Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

'Spokesman Denies Rice Leaked Defense Info'

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-22-06 06:18 PM
Original message
'Spokesman Denies Rice Leaked Defense Info'
Spokesman Denies Rice Leaked Defense Info
By MATTHEW BARAKAT, Associated Press Writer


Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice, center, Chief of Staff ...
ALEXANDRIA, Va. - Condoleezza Rice's spokesman on Saturday branded as "utterly false" a lawyer's claim the secretary of state leaked national defense information to a pro-Israel lobbyist charged with receiving and disclosing such information.

The assertion came as a federal judge granted a defense request to issue subpoenas for Rice and three other government officials in the trial of Steven Rosen and Keith Weissman, the former lobbyists with the American Israel Public Affairs Committee charged in the case.

"The claims by these defense lawyers are utterly false," Rice's spokesman, Sean McCormack, told The Associated Press.

"The secretary is the most careful person in the handling of classified information and she absolutely did not convey classified information to either of these individuals," McCormack said.

Riiiiight. We believe you.:eyes: The truth is already out CONDILIAR.

http://www.comcast.net/news/index.jsp?cat=GENERAL&fn=/2006/04/22/374458.html&cvqh=itn_rice

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
shraby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-22-06 06:19 PM
Response to Original message
1. Just like she didn't leak this
Edited on Sat Apr-22-06 06:20 PM by shraby
guy's name. Noor...for political purposes.

<http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2006/1/5/135154/4164>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
in_cog_ni_to Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-22-06 06:23 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Geezus. They're all a bunch compulsive liars. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tanyev Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-22-06 07:22 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. Forgot about that one.
That's how they do it. They just keep churning up so much crap, we can't keep up with it all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Independent_Liberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-22-06 06:21 PM
Response to Original message
2. Oh no. My Condi wouldn't do that.
Edited on Sat Apr-22-06 06:22 PM by Independent_Liberal
Hahaha!!! Nice try buddy!

:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shenmue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-22-06 06:34 PM
Response to Original message
4. Liar, liar...
pants etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
neoblues Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-22-06 06:35 PM
Response to Original message
5. Lying to the Public is considered an Impeachable offense...
Proposed amendment to the Constitution; to be applicable to the President, Vice-President and all Cabinet members, all members of Congress (House and Senate), and even to the Judges of the Supreme Court.

"No Comment", "I Don't Know", "I Don't Remember", "I'll Have to Get Back To You On That"... would all be necessarily more common responses.

In any case, we desperately need the Truth--especially from our elected (and/or supremely appointed) representatives/leaders; and there must be a penalty for lying/misleading. If it's secret; okay, don't tell us... but even if they think it's in our best interests to think something false is true--it isn't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 12:46 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC