Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

REALITY CHECK: Anti-union ad is no joke ( spot light on the Center for Union Facts )

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Labor Donate to DU
 
Omaha Steve Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-28-08 03:04 PM
Original message
REALITY CHECK: Anti-union ad is no joke ( spot light on the Center for Union Facts )

My oldest daughter in Colorado will be voting against right to work this Nov.

http://www.rockymountainnews.com/news/2008/jun/27/reality-check-anti-union-ad-is-no-joke/

By Raj Chohan, CBS4
Friday, June 27, 2008

You may have seen the provocative anti-union ad making claims about union bosses and coerced union elections. The ad is tongue-in-cheek, but the point it makes is no joke. It comes from an out-of-state 501(c)(4) group called the Center for Union Facts. The group refused to release its donor list, although a like-minded sister organization in Colorado called Coloradans for Employee Freedom lists Colorado conservatives Sean Tonner, Jon Caldara, Mark Hillman, Cory Gardner and Frank McNulty among the local group's board members.

Ad: (Set in an elementary school classroom)

Narrator: What if labor bosses controlled class elections?

Girl running for school office: Thanks for your vote. I want to assure you that a vote for me is best for you.

Boy candidate: Ms. Hudgens has just agreed that there isn't gonna be any secret vote. Sign these cards showing us who you like the best, and my campaign committee will collect and count 'em.

Here's the spin. The ad attacks legislation in Congress called the Employee Free Choice Act. If approved, it would amend the National Labor Relations Act to make it easier for unions to organize.

How would it work? If a simple majority of workers sign cards saying they want a union, EFCA would essentially require the National Labor Relations Board to certify the union, assuming there was no illegal coercion involved in gathering the signatures. Under these circumstances employers would be barred from demanding a secret vote.

While the Center for Union Facts commercial implies EFCA would end secret ballots, that implication isn't technically accurate.

The pro-union group American Rights at Work correctly points out that employers could still call for secret votes when unions gather cards of more than 30 percent, but less then a simple majority of the work force.

The Center for Union Facts counters that unions are unlikely to move for secret elections with less than 50 percent of the cards in hand because such elections would likely fail.

Instead, under the proposed EFCA, union organizers could bypass the election process by simply obtaining signed cards from more than 50 percent of the work force.

Ad: (narration) Labor bosses have a new scheme to do away with the secret ballot.

It's not the whole story.

FULL story at link.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
TomClash Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-28-08 03:13 PM
Response to Original message
1. Wrong
She's voting against the "Right" to Slave.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnorman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-28-08 04:58 PM
Response to Original message
2. It's not exactly an "unknown" outfit. Here's some information
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 10:00 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Labor Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC