Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Starbucks found guilty of violating federal law (trial next month in Grand Rapids, Mi)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Labor Donate to DU
 
Omaha Steve Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-26-08 07:58 PM
Original message
Starbucks found guilty of violating federal law (trial next month in Grand Rapids, Mi)

http://www.examiner.com/x-2071-DC-Special-Interests-Examiner~y2008m12d26-Starbucks-found-guilty-of-violating-federal-law

A National Labor Relations Board judge has found Starbucks guilty of extensive violations of federal labor law in its bid to counter the IWW Starbucks Workers Union. In an 88-page decision, Judge Mindy E. Landow found that Starbucks maintained multiple policies which interfered with workers' right to communicate about the union and about working conditions, terminated three workers in retaliation for union activity, and repeatedly discriminated against union supporters. The decision comes despite a 2006 New York settlement in which Starbucks pledged to stop illegal anti-union activities and mirrors federal government action against the company for its conduct toward baristas in Minnesota and Michigan.

"The judge's decision coupled with previous government findings expose Starbucks for what it is --- a union-busting corporation that will go to staggering lengths to interfere with the right to freedom of association," said Daniel Gross, a barista and member of the IWW Starbucks Workers Union found to have been unlawfully terminated by the coffee giant. "In these trying economic times of mass layoffs and slashed work hours, it's more important than ever that Starbucks and every corporation is confronted with a social movement that insists on the right to an independent voice on the job."

"For the first time, a judge has confirmed the existence of a nationally coordinated anti-union operation at Starbucks," said Stuart Lichten, the attorney for the IWW Starbucks Workers Union in the case. "This decision conclusively establishes Starbucks' animosity toward labor organizing."

The union is confident that Judge Landow's decision will be upheld by the National Labor Relations Board in Washington, D.C. should Starbucks appeal. Starbucks faces another Labor Board trial next month in Grand Rapids, Michigan over illegal union-busting.

The IWW Starbucks Workers Union (StarbucksUnion.org) is an organization of current and former Starbucks employees united for a living wage, secure work hours, and respect on the job. Founded in 2004, the union uses direct action, litigation, and advocacy to both make systemic improvements at Starbucks and take on the company over unfair treatment of individual baristas.

Starbucks was represented by the DC-based union-busting law firm Akin Gump. After Ronald Reagan's decision to bust the PATCO union, "union avoidance" became a lucrative business for law firms as companies actively opposed their workers' right to organize. The Employee Free Choice Act, fiercely opposed by business groups, is expected to pass in 2009. The EFCA will allow workers to negotiate with their employer after a majority agree in a "card check" process. Only after a majority approve a contract in a secret ballot election will a union exist in the workplace.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Fire1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Dec-26-08 08:21 PM
Response to Original message
1. Thanks for the info. No Starbucks for me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 12:20 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Labor Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC