Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

In Rare Move, NLRB Takes Hospitals To Court

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Labor Donate to DU
 
Omaha Steve Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-02-09 08:03 PM
Original message
In Rare Move, NLRB Takes Hospitals To Court

http://blog.aflcio.org/2009/03/02/in-rare-move-nlrb-takes-hospitals-to-court/

by James Parks, Mar 2, 2009

The National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) is asking a federal court to force Fremont-Rideout Health Group to recognize the California Nurses Association/National Nurses Organizing Committee (CNA/NNOC) as the representative of RNs at two of its hospitals and return to the bargaining table to negotiate in good faith.

For three years, management has worked to thwart the nurses’ choice to join a union and bargain collectively at hospitals and clinics in Yuba City and Marysville, north of Sacramento.

The NLRB court filing, known as a “10(j) petition,” is rarely used, except in cases the board considers to be the most egregious violations of federal labor law, according to the union.

Says CNA/NNOC Co-President Deborah Burger:

The government could not send a stronger message of condemnation of the hospital’s misconduct. It’s time for hospital officials to stop trampling on the rights of their dedicated registered nurses, and move towards a fair agreement that will benefit the patients, the nurses, the community, and the hospital.

Burger adds the hospital’s “deplorable” campaign against the RNs presents a clear example of why the Employee Free Choice Act should be enacted.

After the RNs voted for CNA/NNOC in 2006, Fremont-Rideout management launched an anti-union campaign, has delayed negotiations and refused to bargain in good faith, the union says. The proposed Employee Free Choice Act would allow either side to request federal mediation if they cannot agree on a deal after 90 days. After 30 days of mediation, if there is still no agreement, the dispute would be referred to binding arbitration.

FULL story at link.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
pleah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-02-09 08:10 PM
Response to Original message
1. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Earth Bound Misfit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-03-09 12:46 PM
Response to Original message
2. The "heaviest weapon in the arsenal of the NLRB"---- and seldom used
Edited on Tue Mar-03-09 12:47 PM by Earth Bound Misfit
http://www.examiner.com/x-2071-DC-Special-Interests-Examiner~y2009m3d3-A-case-study-for-the-Employee-Free-Choice-Act-nurses-still-waiting-three-years-after-vote

Called a "10(j) petition" after the section of the National Labor Relations Act authorizing this form of relief, this filing is the heaviest weapon in the arsenal of the NLRB – and seldom used, except in cases the board considers to be the most egregious violations of federal labor law.

"The government could not send a stronger message of condemnation of the hospital's misconduct," said CNA/NNOC Co-president Deborah Burger. "It's time for hospital officials to stop trampling on the rights of their dedicated registered nurses, and move towards a fair agreement that will benefit the patients, the nurses, the community, and the hospital."

Noting nearly three years have passed since the Fremont-Rideout RNs chose to join CNA, Burger said the hospital's "deplorable campaign against the RNs present a clear case study in why the Employee Free Choice Act should be enacted.

Even though the RNs voted for CNA/NNOC, Fremont-Rideout maneuvered to overturn the results through legal machinations, delays, and a refusal to engage in good faith bargaining, all intended to prevent the negotiation of a fair first collective bargaining contract. EFCA would provide for mediation and binding arbitration to assure a first contract is achieved.


:kick: & Rec :fistbump:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pberq Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-03-09 03:31 PM
Response to Original message
3. Now we're talking - the NLRB is doing what it is supposed to
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dcsmart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-03-09 03:37 PM
Response to Original message
4. K & R
Maybe this is a message from the new administration: unions are going to have a voice.

:toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 04:22 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Labor Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC