Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

(Colorado) Bill would give unemployment to locked-out workers

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Labor Donate to DU
 
Omaha Steve Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-17-09 12:58 PM
Original message
(Colorado) Bill would give unemployment to locked-out workers

http://www.examiner.com/a-2016037~Bill_would_give_unemployment_to_locked_out_workers.html

May 14, 2009 4:24 PM

DENVER (Map, News) -
As union representatives and grocery store chains try to negotiate new contracts, Gov. Bill Ritter must decide whether to sign a bill that could affect the balance of power in such talks.

The measure (House Bill 1170) passed by the Legislature would allow workers who are locked out by their employers to collect unemployment benefits. They're not automatically eligible for such benefits now because of a law passed in response to a clash between the United Food and Commercial Workers and grocery stores in 1996.

Then, as now, the chains coordinated during contract talks. When King Soopers workers went on strike in 1996, Safeway locked out its workers in support. The state paid over $5 million in unemployment benefits to the Safeway workers over the protests of the company. The Colorado Supreme Court upheld the move but in 1999, at the urging of retailers, state lawmakers agreed to change the law to make it to make a distinction between offensive and defensive lockouts.

Under the current law, a company can call for a defensive lockout to protect its property from vandalism or if a strike has been called against another company it is coordinating with during negotiations. Unemployment benefits are not paid out.

An offensive lockout occurs when a company locks out its workers for some other reason, such as a tactic to encourage workers to accept a contract offer. Workers would get unemployment benefits then.

But the union argues it's easy for stores to claim a defensive lockout under the law and difficult for unions to disprove them.

FULL story at link.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Labor Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC