Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Sask. judge overturns Wal-Mart union certification (employees voted yes in 2004)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Labor Donate to DU
 
Omaha Steve Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-26-09 03:57 PM
Original message
Sask. judge overturns Wal-Mart union certification (employees voted yes in 2004)

http://www.cbc.ca/canada/saskatchewan/story/2009/06/24/wal-mart.html

Last Updated: Wednesday, June 24, 2009 | 1:35 PM CT

A Saskatchewan judge has overturned the union certification of a Weyburn Wal-Mart store, saying workers should be allowed to vote on the matter.

It's the latest twist in a battle between the retail giant and the United Food and Commercial Workers union.

The union applied for certification in 2004 after obtaining signed union cards from most of the employees in the proposed bargaining unit. The labour relations board approved certification in 2008.

The law in 2004 was that if more than 50 per cent of employees signed cards, a secret ballot vote wasn't required.

However, after the Saskatchewan Party won the 2007 provincial election, defeating the NDP, the law changed — an employee vote is now mandatory before certification can be considered.

Justice Peter Foley ruled the amended Trade Union Act should have been the basis of the labour board's decision when it ruled on the Wal-Mart case in 2008.

"The UFCW had no vested right to insist on a particular procedure involving membership cards being followed by the board," Foley said in the 11-page decision which was made public Wednesday.

FULL story at link.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
pleah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-26-09 04:04 PM
Response to Original message
1. K&R Am I understanding this right, that these people that voted
to form a union will now have to vote again? And, what of the people, how many since then have been intimidated to not vote union?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 07:29 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Labor Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC