While it is certainly good news and is BETTER THAN LOSING it, Murrays will now avail themselves of the myriad appeals and stall tactics built into the antediluvian system we not so affectionately call Amurkin Labor Law as defined by the archaic NLRA & it's toothless governing body, the NLRB. Endless litigation, appeals, postponement of hearings, delay after delay after delay.... :banghead: :banghead: All the while, Murrays
likely gets to proceed as if they won the original decision. :mad: :mad:
Confessions of a Union Buster, by Martin Jay Levitt, Crown Publishers Inc., 302 pp.,ISBN 0517583305, 9780517583302
Levitt’s first union-busting campaigns introduced him to the most “common strategy among management lawyers.” First, Levitt tells us, “Challenge everything ... then take every challenge to a full hearing ... then prolong each hearing” as long as possible, then “appeal every unfavorable decision.”
According to Levitt there was method to the madness. “If you make the union fight drag on long enough, workers...lose faith, lose interest, lose hope.” Taking away people’s hopes, their aspirations for a better future – that was Levitt’s job.
I HATE being a Gloomy Gus, but it is what it is. If the American populace knew how badly they were being bent over and FV%*ED IN THE ASS EVERY DAY OF THEIR LIVES by the lack of a fair labor law system, they (we) would being storming the Bastille demanding relief. But try to explain it to the average citizen and their eyes
glaze over with that thousand yard stare.
Frustrating, don't you think OS?
Kick n Rec
ETA: Whatever happened to that bill...what was it called...the Something Act of Freedom to Choosing Something Something? The Employable Actions of Choosing Freedoms??? I just can't recall...
Whatever happened to it?