Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

“We have no protection for our workers (father was killed in the mine)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Labor Donate to DU
 
Omaha Steve Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-05-06 05:21 PM
Original message
“We have no protection for our workers (father was killed in the mine)
The nation watched with horror as we learned of the 12 deaths in the mine explosion in Tallmansville, W.Va. Our hearts sank with the grief of the miners’ families, compounded by the tragically erroneous reports that most of their loved ones had survived. All of our thoughts and prayers go out to the families of these men and to the men and women who worked side by side with them every day.

As we watched the tragedy unfold and learned more about the mine, our grief was coupled with anger. We learned the Sago Mine had more than 270 safety violations over the past two years. In the past year alone, the mine was cited nine times for failing to enact a proper mine ventilation plan, a key to preventing fires and explosions in the mine.

Despite a record of violations and injuries much higher than the average for coal mines of similar size, the mine’s owner paid just $24,000 in fines in the past two years—with most of the serious violations carrying a penalty of just $247 each—far from enough to force the company to change its practices.

Why so little enforcement? As The New York Times put it in an editorial this morning, “the Bush administration’s cramming of important posts in the Department of the Interior with biased operatives from the coal, oil and gas industry is not reassuring about general safety in the mines.” The administration followed a similar practice at the Mine Safety and Health Administration (MSHA), the agency responsible for overseeing mine safety, appointing coal industry management officials to key positions, who promoted “cooperation” over enforcement.

What’s more, the administration and the Republican-led Congress has cut inspectors and worker safety programs from MSHA at a time when the coal industry is growing and more resources are needed to keep our miners safe. The 2006 budget passed by Congress cuts $4.9 million, after adjusting for inflation, from MSHA’s 2005 budget.

And we cannot ignore the fact that workers in the Sago Mine did not have a union to back them up when they raised safety concerns. As John Bennett, whose father was killed in the mine accident, said on NBC’s Today show yesterday:

“We have no protection for our workers. We need to get the United Mine Workers back in these coal mines to protect these safety violations, to protect the workers....

“Now they got to work in unsafe conditions. That’s why we got 12 dead men laying in the morgue right now, along with my father.”

When the workers who go down in the coal mines every day have no one to speak for them, when former coal company officials are responsible for enforcing worker safety laws, when companies face only a slap on the wrist for serious, repeated violations that put their workers in grave danger, tragedies like the Sago Mine explosion are inevitable. We must do everything in our power to see safety measures are strongly enforced and workers have a real right to form a union without employer harassment or interference.

What happened to these 12 miners is an unspeakable tragedy. The grief of their families is unfathomable. Our thoughts and prayers are with everyone touched by this disaster.

As mine workers’ advocate Mother Jones told us, we must “pray for the dead, and fight like hell for the living” to see that this kind of tragedy does not happen again.

In solidarity,

Working Families e-Activist Network, AFL-CIO

P.S. If you would like to learn more about the Sago Mine disaster, here are a few resources worth a look:

The New York Times editorial, “The Sago Mine Disaster,” Jan. 5

USA Today, “Mine Had Hundreds of Violations,” Jan. 4

Today show video interview with John Bennett, Jan. 4
(Click “Governor, victim’s son discuss accident” link in video box on the right side.)

Working for Change, “EXCLUSIVE: Bush Ignored Explicit Warnings in 2002 About Mine Safety,” Jan. 4

House Committee on Education and the Workforce, Democratic staff, “Lawmakers Call for Immediate Congressional Hearings into Mine Safety to Help Prevent Another Tragedy,” Jan. 4

Visit the Web address below to tell your friends about this.
Tell-a-friend!

If you received this message from a friend, you can sign up for Working Families e-Activist Network.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Mend Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-05-06 05:36 PM
Response to Original message
1. I believe unions are the answer. How much does it cost a miner
a year to join a union? Maybe we could contribute to a union dues fund.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
benburch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-05-06 05:51 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Getting into the Union is difficult, I am told.
Which is something I think ought to be changed yesterday.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bperci108 Donating Member (969 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-17-06 10:40 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Not this one.
www.iww.org


And forget the NLRB and government (and big union)bureaucrats...

Why play the game by rules that are designed to ensure that you lose

no matter what?



:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GrpCaptMandrake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-05-06 06:26 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. The UMWA would organize Sago and all the other ICG mines
in a heartbeat. But it starts with the workers. They have to *want* the UMWA and sign cards and have enough guts to stand up to the bosses when they try to break them.

Some of it is also a matter of Greedonomics. A non-union miner gets paid more than a union miner, generally, for the very purpose of keeping the UMWA out. The reason is that the non-union miner isn't paying into a pension fund, among other things.

The dues aren't the biggest problem.

Tall order in America these days.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demosincebirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-12-06 08:51 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Also, the laws in this country make it easy to keep
the union out. We also depend on who's in charge in the NLRB, usaully an appointee of the Prez.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bperci108 Donating Member (969 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-17-06 10:45 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. See above....
Make an end run around the rules and do it the old Wobbly way:

Organize anyway. If it's a minority at first, so what?

Solidarity trumps union and national politics.

The coal mines have a rich tradition of just such a thing. :evilgrin:


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 11:39 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Labor Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC