Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Rep. Kaptur Scolds GOP: 'Democrat' Party Doesn't Exist

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Political Videos Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-03-09 12:37 PM
Original message
Rep. Kaptur Scolds GOP: 'Democrat' Party Doesn't Exist
Edited on Tue Mar-03-09 12:38 PM by babylonsister
 
Run time: 00:38
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RQuYZjcbmUE
 
Posted on YouTube: March 03, 2009
By YouTube Member:
Views on YouTube: 0
 
Posted on DU: March 03, 2009
By DU Member: babylonsister
Views on DU: 11010
 
http://thinkprogress.org/2009/03/03/kaptur-democrat-party/

Rep. Kaptur scolds GOP: ‘Democrat Party’ doesn’t exist.

During today’s House Budget Committee hearing, Rep. Jeb Hensarling (R-TX) repeatedly invoked the “Democrat Party” while questioning Office of Management and Budget director Peter Orszag. Immediately following Hensarling’s time, Rep. Marcy Kaptur (D-OH) took him to task for using the purposefully-disparaging moniker, reminding him that no such party exists:

I’d like to begin by saying to my colleague from Texas that there isn’t a single member on this side of the aisle that belongs to the “Democrat Party.” We belong to the Democratic Party. So the party you were referring to doesn’t even exist. And I would just appreciate the courtesy when you’re referring to our party, if you’re referring to the Democratic Party, to refer to it as such.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-03-09 12:39 PM
Response to Original message
1. Good for Kaptur!!!!! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hyper_Eye Donating Member (429 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-03-09 12:44 PM
Response to Original message
2. I am so glad to see people getting called out on this lately.
When they say the "Democrat Party" it is absolutely offensive and childish. We don't run around insulting them in such a childish manner. When they do this they reinforce the idea that Limbaugh is the leader of their party, that they are not properly educated, and that they are complete morons. Can they please move on from childish nonsense like this and get to the business of the people?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacetalksforall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-03-09 05:20 PM
Response to Reply #2
40. The key word is childish. Juvenile fits also. Both words fit the Republicans .
Cheney - the manipulative-scheming child. Bush the imp with aressted development and spoiled - insulting and out of control. Limbaugh Hannity. the bullies and exaggerators. Millions of them are the silent complicit cheerleading-enablers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MindMatter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-03-09 11:45 PM
Response to Reply #40
77. She used the word "Courtesy"
And that's a very good way of putting it. Debate about policies. Disagree about solutions. That is fair game. But these people are just plain pricks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-04-09 12:02 AM
Response to Reply #77
79. Yes. In a forum where they are supposed to be referring to each other
as "Gentlelady" and "Gentleman" they are certainly not supposed to be coupling that courtesy with an intentional insult as to a party name.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tavalon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-04-09 06:22 AM
Response to Reply #2
92. Actually, I and many others here have taken to calling them Republics
in a childish attempt to one up them. I think calling them out is certainly more adult.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
George II Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-04-09 12:04 PM
Response to Reply #92
103. I've been calling them "Republics" for about 10 years (when I'm not calling them assholes!!)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RoBear Donating Member (781 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-04-09 12:10 PM
Response to Reply #103
105. On TV the other day
Barney Frank referred to one of them (don't remember who--they're so singularly devoid of personality except in their methods of spewing hatred) as "republicanistical," (or republicanist).

I've begun referring to them as republicanistas.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
George II Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-04-09 12:14 PM
Response to Reply #105
108. I saw that, Barney was pretty funny, but I stil l prefer "asshole"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RoBear Donating Member (781 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-04-09 12:19 PM
Response to Reply #108
110. hehehe...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
StatGirl Donating Member (263 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-04-09 12:56 PM
Response to Reply #92
114. I prefer "Publicans" :)
It just has a nice biblical ring to it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JJ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-03-09 12:45 PM
Response to Original message
3. Long time coming.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barney Donating Member (107 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-03-09 12:48 PM
Response to Original message
4. I'm Glad She Put Him in his Place
The term "Democrat Party" has been in the standard Repub talking points for many years now. Old mushmouth Haley Barbour, now Governor of Mississippi, was one of the early adopters during the Clinton Administration.

They even ran an ad, in Florida as I recall, putting the last three letters RAT in big and bold letters.

I guess they think saying "Democrat Party" is cute, but it merely makes them appear illiterate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Wielding Truth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-03-09 01:03 PM
Response to Reply #4
11. They know it's an insult. Don't let them fool you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hootinholler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-03-09 02:22 PM
Response to Reply #4
22. "early adopters during the Clinton Administration"
Hey Barney, welcome to DU. The use of that slur BTW, goes back to jumpin Joe MacCarthy.

-Hoot
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Wizard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-03-09 06:21 PM
Response to Reply #4
44. It started with
disgraced drunken Senator Joseph McCarthy. He contended there was nothing democratic about the Democratic Party so his attempt at derisive political name calling was to use the term Democrat Party. It fell out of fashion for a while but regained popularity among the knuckle dragging cretins in the past 15 years, making a comeback during the Clinton presidency.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xxqqqzme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-04-09 03:39 AM
Response to Reply #44
87. There was a posting here a year or so ago
Edited on Wed Mar-04-09 03:52 AM by xxqqqzme
that showed an early, early TV film (b/w, all fuzzy) of prescott * on a Sunday morning news show calling our party 'democrat party'. It is on youtube. I'll see if I saved it.

Found it: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c8pFS0P8i38

at around 3:35

The arrogant gene must be in the * chain - whew!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
George II Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-04-09 12:55 PM
Response to Reply #87
113. Was that before or after he was outed as a Nazi financier and his assets seized?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ellenfl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-04-09 02:07 PM
Response to Reply #87
115. interesting. i believe 41 started as a dem. eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
certainot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-04-09 04:27 AM
Response to Reply #44
89. it's a good example of what limbaugh and sons can do given the world's
biggest soapbox for coordinated UNCONTESTED repetition from 1000 radio stations

they made it acceptable through loud repetition, something TV and print could not have done. like torture, attacking iraq, and so many other republican wonders.

limbaugh is just the tip of the talk radio iceberg and it needs to be melted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Left Coast2020 Donating Member (597 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-04-09 03:35 AM
Response to Reply #4
86. Rep. Issa from San Diego got same treatment from ........
Chris Matthews a few days ago. But worse. Issa used same 'singular" phrase as opposed to "possessive" form ( I believe thats correct discription). Nonetheless, this appears to be a trend of the party of greed lately due to their getting their assess kicked in November. Matthews really gave Issa the third degree with Rep Frank of MA. enjoying every minute of it--who was on the show.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NancyBotwin Donating Member (28 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-03-09 12:52 PM
Response to Original message
5. hahaha
I love it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Wielding Truth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-03-09 12:54 PM
Response to Original message
6. Hallelujah! That kind of disrespect from Republicans must end.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hassin Bin Sober Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-03-09 12:55 PM
Response to Original message
7. "not on my time ... but I think the gentleman heard the message"
LOL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Optical.Catalyst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-04-09 05:06 AM
Response to Reply #7
91. Jeb Hensarling will be pleased to be informed that there will be no Republican Party after 2012
We are going to have 65 Senators after the 2010 election.

When the Republicans get their heads handed to them in the 2012 elections, the party will pass into the nether regions and will be replaced.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProfessorPlum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-03-09 12:59 PM
Response to Original message
8. I AM DELIGHTED to K&R this thread to the greatest page
Yeah! Yeah Marcy!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-03-09 01:00 PM
Response to Original message
9. A couple of weeks ago, there was a call-in segment on CSPAN with a Repub congresscritter and
one of the callers told the Repub to call the Democratic Party by its correct name, and that to avoid doing so was childish. The Pubbie actually looked a bit embarrassed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-03-09 01:03 PM
Response to Original message
10. Good for her!
People who do this need to be called out for it. It may be a minor thing, but I believe most of the time it's intentional, and it's meant to be demeaning and insulting to Democrats.

The media does this a lot as well, and when I hear them do it I try to write the network and complain. I say the same thing, "There is no such thing as the Democrat Party, just like there is no Republic Party."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whathehell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-03-09 01:06 PM
Response to Original message
12. Good for her!...Glad to see this getting called out lately too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
T Wolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-03-09 01:08 PM
Response to Original message
13. Democrats should simply refuse to talk with or to repukes who use the term. They can preface their
statement in a way similar to what Rep. Kaptur said, ala "There is no one here who is a member of the Democrat Party, so I do not take anything you said as a serious or legitimate comment."

People who think that this is not important do not realize the power that language does have in shaping communications and relationships.

I say, use the rethug ignorance and snarkiness as weapon against them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GOPBasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-03-09 01:23 PM
Response to Original message
14. hahahaha that's awesome. :-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
npk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-03-09 01:23 PM
Response to Original message
15. Matthews scolded some other idiot the other night
For saying the exact same thing. It is a widespread epidemic of idiocy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mwb970 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-03-09 02:35 PM
Response to Reply #15
23. Tweety was great. He really lit into the idiot.
I am so sick of childish behavior from right-wing jerks. That is not what we need now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bread_and_roses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-03-09 10:03 PM
Response to Reply #23
66. Did he ever have the opportunity to do so in the * years? and did he take it?
I dont' give media mouthpieces any credit when it's easy. It was no less a deliberate attempt at a slur when * was in office. Now, if Tweety never had the chance during those years to correct some trogdylite R, I'll happily give him credit now. (I don't watch, and rely on Media Matters, FAIR, and posters here to keep me up with what the MSM is up to)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ino Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-04-09 12:17 AM
Response to Reply #66
80. Yes, Tweety did comment on that during the bush years.
I remember him taking Ron Christie to task for it, and another person I can't remember who.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bread_and_roses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-04-09 07:10 AM
Response to Reply #80
93. Well good for him, then. (n/t)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WatchWhatISay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-03-09 11:11 PM
Response to Reply #23
73. Except that he won't say a word to Tom Delay
when he uses it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Towlie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-03-09 07:30 PM
Response to Reply #15
50. Not exactly. Darrell Issa referred to the "Democrat Congress", as in "Democrat-controlled Congress".
... just for the sake of accuracy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TankLV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-03-09 09:56 PM
Response to Reply #50
63. It's never acceptable for "democrat" congress...
it's ALWAYS DEMOCRATIC congress, or "Democratic-controlled" congress - you CAN'T interchange the two terms.

It's DEMEANING and INSULTING and INCORRECT GRAMMER...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Towlie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-03-09 11:19 PM
Response to Reply #63
76. I never said it was acceptable, I'm just pointing out that Issa DIDN'T say "the exact same thing".
But since you mention it, is "Democratic-controlled congress" really correct grammar? I don't think so. That would mean a congress controlled by "Democratics". Are you a Democratic? ;-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
George II Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-04-09 12:11 PM
Response to Reply #50
107. Issa used the term more than once, in different contexts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GoCubsGo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-03-09 07:34 PM
Response to Reply #15
51. It was Darrell Issa, I believe
He is as annoying as those car alarms he sells.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onehandle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-03-09 11:07 PM
Response to Reply #15
71. I saw that. Chris was awesome. The prick backed down and kinda apologized.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
George II Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-04-09 12:20 PM
Response to Reply #71
111. Issa sincerely looked apologetic....
...in fact, I sent Issa an email that night thanking him for his apology and honesty (yes, I used that term to refer to a Republic!), but since I don't live in his district I got a robo-response saying that they can't reply to out of district emails.

So, unfortunately he probably will never see it.

Let's see if he ever uses that term again, that will indicate his sincerity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onehandle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-04-09 03:43 PM
Response to Reply #111
117. I think at that moment he realized that the old Gingrich/Delay/Rove speak was history.
I hope not. That stuff is Really hurting them at the moment.

Rush For President!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
George II Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-04-09 06:11 PM
Response to Reply #117
119. I'd love to see any combination of Jindal/Limbaugh/Palin as their ticket in 2012!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Left Coast2020 Donating Member (597 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-04-09 03:39 AM
Response to Reply #15
88. Darrel Issa of San Diego. See #86
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SaveOurDemocracy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-03-09 01:27 PM
Response to Original message
16. Nice job! K&R n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FlyingSquirrel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-03-09 01:34 PM
Response to Original message
17. The reason they can get away with it, is
Edited on Tue Mar-03-09 01:35 PM by FlyingSquirrel
because an individual member of the Republican party is known as a Republican,

whereas an individual member of the Democratic party is NOT known as a Democratic.

The word Democrat refers to a member of the Democratic party, whereas the word Republic does not refer to a member of the Republican party.

To put it another way, you could say that we belong to a party of Democrats, whereas they do not belong to a party of Republics.

And so, if we were a party of Sheep (some may in fact agree with that statement), someone from the (Wolf?) party could get away with 'inadvertently' referring to us as the "Sheep Party" instead of the "Sheepish Party".

;-)

I say screw it, don't rise to the bait because as we all know, that's the sure way to get a bully to continue tormenting you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacetalksforall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-03-09 05:24 PM
Response to Reply #17
41. Did anyone hear how he defended it? Or what he said in reply? Did he get to say
it later.

I hope it starts a trend within Congress and on C-span - to speak up and call them on it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Career Prole Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-03-09 06:42 PM
Response to Reply #17
47. "an individual member of the Republican party
is known as a Republican"

Actually an individual member of the republican party is known as a @#$%, rather than a @#$%an.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TankLV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-03-09 09:58 PM
Response to Reply #17
64. we don't care WHY they do it - it's INSULTING and IMPROPER. PERIOD.
THEY know full well WHY they do it.

Are party just happens to have more evolved adjectives to define itself.

If WE decide to change it - that's one thing. We're not, and the REPUKES should respect us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Wizard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-04-09 12:11 PM
Response to Reply #64
106. Bad usage
and grammatically incorrect.
Democrat is a noun. Members of the Democratic Party are Democrats. Using the word democrat as an adjective to modify another noun, party, is incorrect. Did anyone expect something different from a political party that defiles education? Their deliberate abuse of language gives them plausible deniability so as to not be nailed down with their lies. For eight years we heard a president who couldn't complete a sentence. His lexicon ran the gamut from Esperanto to Tralfamadorian to several tongues on Remulak.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WhoIsNumberNone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-03-09 01:52 PM
Response to Original message
18. Finally! Somebody said it!
For the record- I've been referring to 'them' as the "Republic Party" for some weeks now. I wonder if she reads this board?....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SharonAnn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-03-09 11:17 PM
Response to Reply #18
75. Or maybe the "Publican Party"? As in the Publicans and the Pharisees?
Edited on Tue Mar-03-09 11:22 PM by SharonAnn
Could be pretty appropriate, when you think about it.

Wikipedia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Publicani

"In antiquity, publicans (Latin publicanus (singular); publicani (plural)) were public contractors, in which role they often supplied the Roman legions and military, managed the collection of port duties, and oversaw public building projects. In addition, they served as tax collectors for the Republic (and later the Roman Empire), bidding on contracts (from the Senate in Rome) for the collection of various types of taxes. Importantly, this role as tax collectors was not emphasized until late into the history of the Republic (c. 1st century BC). The publicans were usually of the class of equites.

At the height of the Republic's era of provincial expansion (roughly the first and second centuries BC until the end of the Republic) the Roman tax farming system was very profitable for the publicani. The right to collect taxes for a particular region would be auctioned every few years for a value that (in theory) approximated the tax available for collection in that region. The payment to Rome was treated as a loan and the publicani would receive interest on their payment at the end of the collection period. In addition, any excess (over their bid) tax collected would be pure profit for the publicani. The principal risk to the publicani was that the tax collected would be less than the sum bid.

By New Testament times, publicans were seen chiefly as tax collectors by provincial peoples. It is in this sense that the term is used in Jesus' parable of the Pharisee and the Publican. However, their role as public contractors, especially as regards building projects, was still significant.

With the rise of a much larger Imperial bureaucracy, this task of the publicans, as well as their overall importance, declined precipitously. Evidence for the existence of publicans extends as far back as the 3rd century BC, although it is generally assumed that they existed at still earlier times in Roman history. Knowledge of a tentative terminus post quem is taken from the histories of the 1st century AD Imperial historian Livy."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Capt. America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-03-09 01:55 PM
Response to Original message
19. Touchdown! By the way, for every time they call me a socialist, I am going to call them fascist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iamthebandfanman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-03-09 02:58 PM
Response to Reply #19
25. nah, 'get a job!' is usually more effective
they really hate when people use that slogan back at them... lol
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SnowCritter Donating Member (192 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-04-09 09:22 AM
Response to Reply #25
97. You *could* do both...
as in "Hey, you fascist, get a job!"

:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-03-09 02:06 PM
Response to Original message
20. oh baby she slapped him down good for her!!!!
even Chris Matthews said the same thing to Rep Issa about a week ago when he was on. Just shows you what jerks the republicans are.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pansypoo53219 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-03-09 02:14 PM
Response to Original message
21. pfft. just call them publicans
til they get it. hell, call them whigs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlbertCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-03-09 03:08 PM
Response to Reply #21
26. call them whigs.
Know-nothings.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
howmad1 Donating Member (959 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-03-09 06:33 PM
Response to Reply #21
46. Every time I talk about them, I call them.....
RETHUGLICANS! Really pisses them off, but then again, who the hell cares what they think.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ihavenobias Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-03-09 02:54 PM
Response to Original message
24. K & R n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DWilliamsamh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-03-09 03:25 PM
Response to Original message
27. Good for her but it is counterproductive
As much as we know how stupid the GOP calling it "the Democrat Party" is, it is counterproductive to call them out on it. It is EXACTLY the same thing as when we were in school and some big idiot Neanderthal would call one of the smart kid named "Brian" "Cryin'." It was stupid and juvenile then and it stupid and juvenile now. The only problem is pointing it out to the bully is only guaranTEED to make him do it more. Republican's and conservatives who engage in the "democrat party" meme are only going to continue to use it. They can't help it: their nature is to be bullying, stupid, and juvenile.

As infuriating as it can be, the best bet is to just not react. Once they stop getting the reaction they are looking for they will move on to some no doubt equally stupid name calling.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zodiak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-03-09 03:47 PM
Response to Reply #27
28. They've been doing it constantly for 15 years, now
And no one has called them on it in all of that time....and their snarky little meme only caught on more and more to the point where the media was repeating it. That's how their bullshit works....they COUNT on everyone being afraid to call them on it.

So no, your method did not work.

I say call 'em on it and tell them that if they refuse to treat their colleagues with respect, they can expect no seat at the table.

THAT's how you deal with bullies. You punch them dead in the face and tell them to sit down and shut the fuck up or they'll get it again.

I've dealt with plenty of them in my day. I had buck teeth, head-gear, and a mean right hook when cornered.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lob1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-03-09 03:54 PM
Response to Reply #27
29. I totally disagree. The jerks need to be called out on their crap.
Edited on Tue Mar-03-09 03:58 PM by lob1
If we don't call them out, we look weak and they'll keep doing it. When Matthews called out Issa, he made Izza look stupid, like they don't even know the
English language. Issa looked befuddled for being called out, and agreed that "democrat" was a wrong use of the language. I say we push their nose in their own stupidity.

Edited cause my computer is a terrible speller.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
denverbill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-03-09 04:02 PM
Response to Reply #27
30. I totally disagree.
This isn't a bully/bullied situation. No Democrat is afraid Republickers are going to punch them if they stand up to them.

It is childish. It is stupid and juvenile.

If your co-worker insists on calling you 'dumbass' do you just sit there and take it? No, not unless your an absolute wimp. You tell them to knock it off and if they persist you take actions. You humiliate them into stopping it by calling them out publicly. Or you threaten to go to personnel and report them. Cause guess what? If you don't pretty soon everyone in the office is going to be calling you 'dumbass', since you obviously don't object.

This ain't grade school and it ain't bullies. It's work and your co-workers can't show you respect then they need to be forced to do so. And if they refuse, then new rules need to be passed to enforce common courtesy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mikebake Donating Member (3 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-03-09 04:46 PM
Response to Reply #30
35. I kinda agree but
What "actions"?
"Forced to do so" exactly how? That matters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
denverbill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-03-09 06:27 PM
Response to Reply #35
45. Progressively stronger actions.
As I said you start by asking politely for them to stop. If they don't stop, you attempt to shame them into behaving by pointing it out what they are doing and calling them childish and/or incapable of learning, if they insist they are doing it accidentally. If that still doesn't work you pass a rule stating that deliberate and/or continual use of mispronunciation of a person's or party's name is considering a violation of Congressional ethics, which will be referred to the ethics committee for possible censure or expulsion.

And frankly, if you can't get that rule passed you resort to calling the GOP's leader Republicker Boner.

Is it really too much to ask for basic courtesy and respect from our politicians?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DWilliamsamh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-03-09 11:10 PM
Response to Reply #30
72. Who is congress going to "report it to?"
Edited on Tue Mar-03-09 11:21 PM by DWilliamsamh
I KNOW it isn't high school, it's called an analogy.

The American people are "personnel," and "the boss." The American people were WELL aware of the stupid bullying and childish behavior for all of that time. There has never been any "punishment" for the stupidity and idiocy of these dick-heads. The people of this country just saw this meme as just so much towel snapping. Like high school, when the obnoxious bully was still throwing touchdowns and hitting homeruns(i.e., the stock market looked good, and the pork was rolling into the districts), people just let it slide. But now the people know they were cheating all the time AND the theft is so obvious that it is unavoidable by all but he most delusional sycophantic hangers on. This behavior will not be glossed over so easily any more, so I say let them keep doing it. Let them follow their natures. How does it hurt you or me REALLY?

And btw, I have heard plenty of people "calling out" this behavior for all this time and nothing has changed. I just think it is a fight you don't need to win. Stupid, juvenile assholes will always be the stupid, juvenile assholes they are. Snakes are snakes. These particular snakes kept getting re-elected no matter what snakes they showed themselves to be. Why waste the energy and time to point out to the people that elect them year after year that they are snakes? There constituents know they are snakes, and have shown that hey are coming to the conclusion that MAYBE snakes aren't the best creatures to send to congress.

From a pure political strategy point of view, the worse republicans behave the more they show themselves to be the stupid juvenile assholes they are, the less and less support they will have for their bullshit. People finally understand just how destructive their policy positions are, it can only help that all those people who kept voting for them because they "liked" them, thought they were "regular guys they'd like to have a beer with," now see that the veneer is cracked beyond repair and all these nasty little digs don't look like just "havin' fun." They just look like the kind of things stupid, juvenile assholes say. The times have changed. I for one wouldn't mind if the republicans in congress kept going further "right" and kept acting like dicks. They are much more likely to suffer even more losses, if they don't adopt a veneer of civility. I am happy to let them say "Democrat Party," as long as they like. It hurts them more than it helps.




Edited for grammar and spelling.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Crunchy Frog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-03-09 04:39 PM
Response to Reply #27
34. Absolutely wrong.
Edited on Tue Mar-03-09 04:42 PM by Crunchy Frog
Allowing people to get away with disrespecting you is what's counterproductive. If we don't call them on it we look like we're too cowed to even stand up for ourselves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
graegoyle Donating Member (196 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-03-09 04:59 PM
Response to Reply #27
36. Wrong in every aspect.
As much as we know how stupid the GOP calling it "the Democrat Party" is, it is counterproductive to call them out on it. It is EXACTLY the same thing as when we were in school and some big idiot Neanderthal would call one of the smart kid named "Brian" "Cryin'." It was stupid and juvenile then and it stupid and juvenile now. The only problem is pointing it out to the bully is only guaranTEED to make him do it more. Republican's and conservatives who engage in the "democrat party" meme are only going to continue to use it. They can't help it: their nature is to be bullying, stupid, and juvenile.

As infuriating as it can be, the best bet is to just not react. Once they stop getting the reaction they are looking for they will move on to some no doubt equally stupid name calling.


Standing up to the bully is (usually) the best thing. If one person stands up, others who are bullied will feel empowered to stand up as well and, soon enough, the bully loses his power because he is revealed for what he truly is; a coward who can only pick on the weak and willing because he, himself, is weak.

Conversely, if the bully is allowed to continue to bully whomever he pleases, it does not simply empower the bully, it teaches others that if they also become bullies, they can get their way, too.

Usually, the best way to stand up to a bully is to point out his own short-comings, which diminishes his power and standing over others. In this instance, pointing out how childish and immature the Republicans are by resorting so such juvenile antics puts the onus on them to either demonstrate that they can grow up by being minimally respectful to the other parties or continue to demonstrate to those who want real leadership that they are not mature enough to handle any responsibility.

Which way do you think the Republicans will go?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pooka Fey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-03-09 05:11 PM
Response to Reply #27
37. Wrong. You have to define your boundaries if you want your boundaries to be respected.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TankLV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-03-09 10:02 PM
Response to Reply #27
65. WRONG! We've ignored it TILL NOW, goddammit, and they are using it more and more...!!!
WE will make them stop it, mark my words.

It is VERY "productive"...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DWilliamsamh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-04-09 03:27 AM
Response to Reply #65
85. Please see my response upthread (n/t)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-03-09 11:59 PM
Response to Reply #27
78. That old advice about how to handle bullies -- by ignoring them and not reacting?
It doesn't work on the playground and doesn't work in life.

Fortunately, most "experts" have stopped giving that bit of playground advice. It is important to stand up to a bully -- but that doesn't mean becoming one yourself.

I am glad that this time a Democratic woman spoke up loud and clear.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DWilliamsamh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-04-09 03:27 AM
Response to Reply #78
83. Please see my response upthread (n/t)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tuvor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-04-09 01:32 AM
Response to Reply #27
82. Clinton ignored Limbaugh, and look where it got him.
Lesson: The best defense is a strong...you know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DWilliamsamh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-04-09 03:27 AM
Response to Reply #82
84. Please see my response upthread (n/t)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
navarth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-03-09 04:25 PM
Response to Original message
31. Good for Marcy. It's about time we started answering. eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Crunchy Frog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-03-09 04:33 PM
Response to Original message
32. THANK YOU!!!!!
It's about fucking time. K&R.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FLAprogressive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-03-09 04:37 PM
Response to Original message
33. oh my....she bitchslapped Hensarling BIG TIME. Go Kaptur!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Best_man23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-03-09 05:12 PM
Response to Original message
38. Should start calling them the DEBTPUBLICAN Party
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Twinguard Donating Member (486 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-03-09 08:24 PM
Response to Reply #38
58. Or we could call them
Rushpublicans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jefferson23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-04-09 09:33 AM
Response to Reply #58
98. LOL, good one!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RoBear Donating Member (781 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-04-09 12:16 PM
Response to Reply #58
109. Best idea yet!
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quiet.american Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-03-09 05:15 PM
Response to Original message
39. Excellent. They've been allowed this foolishness for far too long. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
npk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-03-09 05:57 PM
Response to Original message
42. I like how she cut him off at the end also.
"Not on my time you stupid sack of shit."


Ok so I added the stupid sack of shit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hardrada Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-03-09 06:07 PM
Response to Original message
43. The same idiots that say this probably also say "nukyuler"
and they probably also wear flag pins (or used to when they ran the US).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
happygoluckytoyou Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-03-09 06:45 PM
Response to Original message
48. as a former member of the REPUKELICAN PARTY i resemble that remark!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
edc Donating Member (407 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-03-09 06:48 PM
Response to Original message
49. Attenbtion all English majors
:dunce: It is both foolish and suicidal to allow governance by monolingual, knuckle walking troglodytes who can't even speak their own language properly and who don't know the difference between Democratic Party (the proper noun) and democrat party (the adjectival phrase), which means something like: I went to a democrat party where everyone was getting liberally naked in the hot tub and drinking copious quantities of beer while liberally and progressively toking doobies; which, by the way, explains why there may be typos, spelling, capitalization, punctuation, usage, overly long sentences or other errors of mechanics and style in this missive. But, by god, at least I wasn't straight and sober and pontificating in the Congress of the united States while I did it! What excuse does Rep. Jeb Hensarling (R-Illiterate) have?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlackX-068 Donating Member (65 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-03-09 07:50 PM
Response to Original message
52. A nice way to say....
SHUT THE FREAK UP!!!! To the NO Party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MarinCoUSA Donating Member (783 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-03-09 07:59 PM
Response to Original message
53. About friggin' time! We must answer repuke rhetoric of violence. ALWAYS!
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
clspector Donating Member (295 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-03-09 08:00 PM
Response to Original message
54. It's about damn time!
Hurray! Stop calling our party by that made up name.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RBInMaine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-03-09 08:07 PM
Response to Original message
55. GOOD ! And we are seeing more and Dems punching back on this shit ! Just shows how silly and sad
the GOP fascists are, and how they take their cues from their party leader, Rush Limbaugh, who coined the "Democrat Party" thing. And PS: FUCK THE GRAND OLD PECKERHEADS !!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RBInMaine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-03-09 08:09 PM
Response to Original message
56. How about "GRAND OLD PECKERHEADS" !
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mt13 Donating Member (281 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-03-09 08:13 PM
Response to Original message
57. I Love her!
"not on my time!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Moonwalk Donating Member (437 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-03-09 08:33 PM
Response to Original message
59. Jeb was talking about me. I'm the Democrat party.
And, boy, am I embarrassed to have caused all this trouble. :blush: My party (of which I am the only member), is often confused with "Democratic" party. We are a very different sort of party, however. First off, our emblem is the sea otter, not the donkey. Second, we don't have "ic" after our name. Third, we haven't any candidates, government officials or representatives, just one lonely voter. But now that Jeb has recognized our existence, I have hopes that we will finally get our time in the spotlight and on the news. Can I get a big, sea otter cheer for the Democrat party?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Historic NY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-03-09 09:08 PM
Response to Original message
60. Slap.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iandhr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-03-09 09:10 PM
Response to Original message
61. here here
Thank you Ms. Kaptur
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TankLV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-03-09 09:53 PM
Response to Original message
62. It was DISGUSTING when the AWOL War Criminal bush* did it ALL THE TIME
and NOBODY ever called that fuckface out on it, and it was DISGUSTING to see ALL the texASS repukes do it...

I will never stop referring to them as REPUKES until such time as THEY STOP DOING IT!!!

This is GREAT to see!!!

Keep it up!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-03-09 10:09 PM
Response to Original message
67. Thank you, Nancy Kaptur---!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NBachers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-03-09 10:12 PM
Response to Original message
68. That was so good, I'm going back to watch it again
Rate it up on YouTube
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burning rain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-03-09 10:23 PM
Response to Original message
69. You wait, DUdes and DUdettes.
As the GOP gets boiled down to an even smaller and more deranged base -- and they seem to be in a vicious circle that way -- it would not suprise me if Republican congressmen and senators started referring to Democrats as "Rats" or "demonRATS" or whatever other terms they use over at Mr. Robinson's Neighborhood. They are completely unhinged, and aim to purge as a hated RINO any leader who acts like an adult. They may even start spontaneously combusting; don't stand near.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JDPriestly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-03-09 11:00 PM
Response to Original message
70. Bravo! Representative Kaptur is so right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LastLiberal in PalmSprings Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-03-09 11:15 PM
Response to Original message
74. This is a conscious GOP strategy via Gingrich and pollster Luntz
from Media Matters in 2006:

In recent months, media figures, including news reporters at CNN, The New York Times, The Wall Street Journal, the Chicago Tribune, and the Associated Press echoed Republicans by employing the word "Democrat" as an adjective to describe things or people of, or relating to, the Democratic Party -- including referring to the "Democrat" Party itself, even though that is not the party's name. The ungrammatical conversion of the noun "Democrat" to an adjective was the brainchild of Republican partisans, presumably an attempt to deny the opposing party the claim to being "democratic" -- or in the words of New Yorker magazine senior editor Hendrik Hertzberg, "to deny the enemy the positive connotations of its chosen appellation." In the early 1990s, apparently due largely to the urging of then-House Speaker Newt Gingrich (R-GA) and Republican pollster Frank Luntz, the use of the word "Democrat" as an adjective became near-universal among Republicans.

http://mediamatters.org/items/200608160005

Similarly, Bush gave people derogatory nicknames rather than call them by their proper names. This diminishes the recipient by essentially saying, "You are so insignificant I don't even think it's worth learning your name."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Iwillnevergiveup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-04-09 01:25 AM
Response to Original message
81. You go, Rep. Kaptur
There is no earthly reason to let this "Democrat party" crap slide. In this case, silence implies consent. I recall a middle school student being teased with a nickname that was a play on his real name. He calmly, but forcefully corrected his classmates, and after awhile, it got old and the other kids called him by his proper name. Marcy did it exactly right by phrasing it, "And I would just appreciate the courtesy...." She made the guy look like a bumbleheaded cyclops and put him (and all the ohers) on notice. I think fewer and fewer Republicans will take the risk of a cheap shot and wade into that bottomless swamp.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Optical.Catalyst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-04-09 05:03 AM
Response to Original message
90. Kicked and Recommended
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fasttense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-04-09 08:45 AM
Response to Original message
94. It's as if the Democratic party is growing a back bone before our very eyes.
I love it.:bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DesertDiamond Donating Member (838 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-04-09 08:53 AM
Response to Original message
95. It's just consistency. Neocons are ignorant and they show it by butchering the English language.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DirtyDawg Donating Member (594 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-04-09 09:06 AM
Response to Original message
96. One of the ironies...
...of this 'tit-for-tat' argument, and the response I hear from Repugs (that's what I like to call 'em) is that 'at least we have Republicans in the Republican Party, you don't hear about any Democratics in the Democratic Party'...see?

Of course it gets under our skin because that's just what they like to do...and we let 'em. The best way to 'get under the skin' of the Repugnant Party is to continue to make them irrelevant and an increasingly smaller minority political party through solid thinking and positive action.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
byeya Donating Member (209 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-04-09 09:35 AM
Response to Original message
99. I refer to them as RepubliKKKans ever since David Duke
or a surrogate, proudly said the KKK could have written the 2000{I think} Republican platform.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tsakshaug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-04-09 10:42 AM
Response to Original message
100. Local public radio station
The morning news reader on our local NPR station has taken to talking about the 'Democrat controlled state legislature" Every time I hear this I call to complain. I guess the next step is to contact station management
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newmac Donating Member (727 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-04-09 11:21 AM
Response to Original message
101. Its about frikkin time....!!!
Do it again and again and each and every time they say it!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
George II Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-04-09 12:02 PM
Response to Original message
102. It's about time this was OFFICIALLY repudiated...
Chris Mathews did it to Darryl Issa last week on "Hardball". That this was done during a House hearing is even better! When are these children going to LEARN? Republicans have been using that disparaging term, popularized by the most disgraced Senator in our history, Joseph McCarthy.

Maybe we should start referring to them as the "McCarthy Party"??

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
George II Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-04-09 12:07 PM
Response to Original message
104. An interesting article from the "New Yorker" back in 2006:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-04-09 12:35 PM
Response to Original message
112. Taking back our country, one DemocratIC spine at a time!!!! Marcy, you rock!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
harun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-04-09 02:13 PM
Response to Original message
116. I think the Dem's are getting a spine
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DuaneBidoux Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-04-09 05:50 PM
Response to Original message
118. First Tweety the other day and now this? May this be the beginning of sticking up for ourselves!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
George II Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-04-09 06:13 PM
Response to Original message
120. Just had a chance to watch the video...(can't access streaming at work)...
....I just LOVED the way she ended when asked to yield, "Not on my time, I think the gentleman heard the message"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cairycat Donating Member (454 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-04-09 09:33 PM
Response to Reply #120
121. "Not on my time" what a great FU to the thugs
It is not petty, it is a matter of respect. What a treasure for our party Congresswoman Kaptur is.

My daughter, who is 18 and was thrilled to cast her first presidential vote for Obama, but is not so much for the day-to-day nitty gritty of politics, was passing by when I was playing this video. She was pumping her fist in the air and was really pleased to hear one of the great women in the Democratic party demanding the respect WE ARE DUE.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 07:48 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Political Videos Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC