SC Gov Sanford On Gay Marriage Flashback - Guess he wanted to 'protect it'

tomm2thumbs

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Wed Jun-24-09 09:22 PM
Original message

SC Gov Sanford On Gay Marriage Flashback - Guess he wanted to 'protect it'

Run time: 00:45
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EWXVEzUEHIA

Posted on YouTube: June 25, 2009
By YouTube Member:
Views on YouTube: 0

Posted on DU: June 25, 2009
By DU Member: tomm2thumbs
Views on DU: 679

Guess he wanted to really 'protect marriage'. Really really.
He did such a good job of 'protecting marriage' - yes indeed.

So how's that 'protecting marriage' thing going for ya Governor? Eh?

(official image linked to the 'down' governor's official site which magically doesn't really appear to be down as they are posting... hmmm)

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

Ian David

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Wed Jun-24-09 09:37 PM
Response to Original message

1. Marriage is between a Man a Woman and his South American Mistress. n/t

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

ejbr

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Wed Jun-24-09 09:51 PM
Response to Original message

2. Another question Governor,

Do you think the Republican Party should become more Libertarian with regard to extramarital affairs in Argentina?

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

burning rain

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Wed Jun-24-09 10:53 PM
Response to Original message

3. I think what happened to the good governor was,...

he was inclined to be a good and faithful husband, but gays have these special glands that send out promiscuity rays that cause even moral heterosexual Christians to lose control and beat off, or even do the hucklebuck outside the confines of marriage. Or something like that.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

Divine Discontent

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Thu Jun-25-09 12:33 AM
Response to Original message

4. LOL... how sweet it will be...

When another 10 of these false bible-thumpers gets outed for their transgression while denying any two citizens the right to be considered legally bound together by the govt. their shame is what's breaking them. we all have fallen short of the perfection of Christ (my opinion) but when you assail people for just being gay? wow, what a bunch of sick bastards! shame is upon them, and he has forever stained his family - their kids will grow up seeing references to daddy's Argentinian sex affair on cable news and entertainment type shows when another one gets in trouble and they show previous ones and include him.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

DFW

(1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Thu Jun-25-09 02:04 AM
Response to Original message

5. Where is the inconsistency?

Sanford was only asked about gay marriage. Now if Joe Blow had asked him about marriage Mormon/Islamic
style, where a man could have multiple wives, Sanford would have (no doubt) answered in the affirmative.

Right?

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

Liberal_Christian

(387 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore

Thu Jun-25-09 02:08 AM
Response to Original message

6. What's funny is that Christ never mentioned homosexuality in reference to the "sanctity of marriage"

He did although mention;

ADULTERY
and
Divorce

being the offenses toward the "sanctity of marriage"

According to Christ, people like this guy pose more of a threat to the sanctity of marriage than any gay person.

Also funny how many of those who claim they are trying to preserve such a sanctity are guilty of the very offense of which; Ann Coulter, Rush Limbaugh, and a number of other conservative pundits and politicians. Oh the irony, how infuriating (if you're a real Christian and not some conservative pseudo-Christian)

Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top

DU AdBot (1000+ posts)

Sun May 05th 2024, 08:42 PM
Response to Original message

Advertisements [?]

Top

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators

Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.