|
I read Price of Loyalty when it came out, and the whole time I was viewing this video, I was wondering about your statement that you can't support Paul. I thought you meant Paul O'neil and was very distracted by that.
Then when I realized it was a Ron Paul video, I was still disturbed by your statement.
At some point, regardless of personalities, we are going to have to admit that the Progressive Democrats, the Green Party, and the Libertarians, have more COMMON ground than the Corporate Red and Blues.
Consistently during the 2008 campaign I related to Kucinich, Ron Paul, and Edward's WORDS. If I put the personality in there, then I was left to conclude that 'Kucinich does not have the Charisma to lead the whole country, Edwards thank god dropped out before the fresh hell of his affair gave us McCain as president, and Ron Paul is hated by so many on the left. That left Obama with the right words... almost, the Charisma... definitely, and the love of the young which is essential.
That did NOT mean the words and ideas of the others became untrue.
Your statement, "i can't support paul, i just can't", after such a great great piece of video, an important video, is an unnecessary flame retardant. If people are too dumb to hear the truth spoken because they don't care for the messenger, that is their problem.
If you change your statement so that it is clear that you are referring to Ron Paul many people won't even view the video which is a shame, but left as it is, your statement is distracting.
Why not say nothing and let people watch and make their own judgments then you can respond to like minded people or convince others in the comment section?
Just my 2 cents.
|
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
