Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Media Matters' Eric Burns: Fox Is "No Longer A News Organization. This Is A Political Organization"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Political Videos Donate to DU
 
Turborama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-02-09 04:32 AM
Original message
Media Matters' Eric Burns: Fox Is "No Longer A News Organization. This Is A Political Organization"
 
Run time: 03:39
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dT_QDwqDWNk
 
Posted on YouTube: September 30, 2009
By YouTube Member:
Views on YouTube: 0
 
Posted on DU: October 02, 2009
By DU Member: Turborama
Views on DU: 1486
 
Have they ever actually been a "news" organization, though?

I remember seeing Boehner saying just after the election results came in last year that the Republicans will do everything they can to make sure the new administration fails. I can't seem to find a clip of it, though.

DAVID SHUSTER (guest host): Joining us now is the president of MediaMatters.org, Eric Burns. Good evening, Eric.

BURNS: Good evening, David.

SHUSTER: So explain to me, why is it indoctrination when kids sing about President Obama, but it's patriotism when kids sing about President Bush and FEMA?

BURNS: Well, David, it's not indoctrination to anybody except Karl Rove, Josh Bolten, Roger Ailes -- the rest of the Bush administration in exile over at Fox News, because they are trying to push a political agenda. And they're trying to destroy this administration, and they'll use any means necessary to do it.

And just to give you a little example of this, James O'Keefe, who is the author of one of the suspect ACORN videos that there have been a lot of questions surrounding, told Chris Wallace recently on Fox News that he was employing tactics that would, quote, "destroy his political enemies." So that's what this is about.

There's nothing abnormal about folks talking and children learning about their president and learning to be -- learning about their democracy through talking about the president. I did it when I was a kid.

SHUSTER: The videos that were posted did not blur the children's faces. Both schools have pointed out that the parents were not angered by the performances but were angered over their children's privacy being violated. Where is the right's outrage over that?

BURNS: That's a great question, especially for a movement that typically pays a lot of lip service to caring about local control, about families and about kids. And as I understand it, it wasn't just the YouTube videos where their faces weren't blurred. The initial Fox broadcasts of these videos, their faces weren't blurred either. And what -- the question I have is, did Fox go out and get waivers from each and every one of these parents to broadcast their children's image on national television? And if they did, they ought to produce those. Because frankly, it's illegal if they didn't.

SHUSTER: As far as teaching our kids about the president, is there something wrong with teaching our kids to respect the president, to sing in praise of the office of presidency in an office of the first African-American president?

BURNS: Absolutely not. You know, as I said, look, I went to Catholic school in Texas. I was taught about the president and learned to respect the presidency of the United States, to be a patriotic American. My parents were taught the same thing.

This is a very normal and appropriate way to educate young children about our democracy. It's important, and it's -- it just goes to show you to what lengths the folks at Fox News will go to derail the political discussion in this country and what deplorable tactics they will do -- exploiting our nation's children. I think it's really disgusting.

SHUSTER: And is that the general theme here with the right-wing media, I mean, undermining the president by manufacturing controversies, because many of the actual Obama policies are favored by the majority of Americans?

BURNS: Absolutely. We've seen it day after day. You know, Glenn Beck is the smearer in chief over at Fox News. And we see new charts, you know, documenting some new vast conspiracy theory every day, new attacks, and it's a constant barrage.

And I'll tell you, this right-wing noise machine has been ginned up. It's never been more ferocious, and their goal is simple -- as Rush Limbaugh stated at the beginning of the year -- they want Obama to fail. Roger Ailes said that this is the Alamo for conservatives and that Fox is the voice of the opposition.


So, this is no longer a news organization. This is a political organization, and their aim is to destroy a progressive policy agenda. They'd rather win in the ballot box than see any sort of real debate on health care. It's a real shame.

SHUSTER: Eric Burns, president of Media Matters for America. Eric, thanks as always. We appreciate you coming in.

BURNS: Thank you, David.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Enthusiast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-02-09 05:40 AM
Response to Original message
1. Rec! About time someone said it!
Fixed Noise simply can't be taken seriously. Not a single Democrat or left leaning person should submit to a Faux interview or Faux News face time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-02-09 06:24 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Except maybe for Alan Grayson.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enthusiast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-02-09 06:53 AM
Response to Reply #3
7. Even Grayson.
Every time a reasonable person is a guest on Fixed News it lends Fixed News credence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
old mark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-02-09 06:11 AM
Response to Original message
2. Yes, it has been evident for a long time - I'm glad the media is finally
talking about the Fox/RW propaganda machine. They are "news" by no means. They are at times bordering on treason.

mark
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tclambert Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-02-09 06:25 AM
Response to Original message
4. "Roger Ailes said that this is the Alamo for conservatives"
Somehow that makes me feel good. Maybe he's forgotten the Alamo ended in defeat. It was a delaying tactic. Ailes hopes to delay until Obama fails. They're worst fear is that Obama succeeds. If government works, that undercuts the Republicans' basic philosophy. Should get interesting next January around the time of Obama's State of the Union address.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unblock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-02-09 06:28 AM
Response to Original message
5. it was created by roger ailes, a political operative from the reagan campaign
it s created from the start as a partisan propaganda machine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ScottLand Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-02-09 06:52 AM
Response to Original message
6. Terrific! It really should be called Fox Entertainment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Turborama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-02-09 06:55 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. LOL, or "Fox - The Disinformation Station"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ScottLand Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-02-09 08:37 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. That's good.
And their mindless sheep STILL wouldn't turn away.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Douglas Carpenter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-02-09 08:36 AM
Response to Original message
9. kick and recommed
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jfkraus Donating Member (378 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Oct-02-09 09:31 AM
Response to Original message
11. Anytime FOX promotes a republican...
...that has monetary value, right? Can't that be considered a "contribution-in-kind" and limited by campaign finance laws?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
democracy1st Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Oct-03-09 12:32 AM
Response to Original message
12. K & R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 09:28 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Political Videos Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC