Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

RFK, Jr. and Ralph Nader Discuss a Possible Parliamentary System

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Political Videos Donate to DU
 
GoLeft TV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-01-09 09:46 AM
Original message
RFK, Jr. and Ralph Nader Discuss a Possible Parliamentary System
 
Run time: 08:38
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5idmt00Sf2Q
 
Posted on YouTube: November 30, 2009
By YouTube Member:
Views on YouTube: 0
 
Posted on DU: December 01, 2009
By DU Member: GoLeft TV
Views on DU: 874
 
Shortly before the 2008 elections, billionaire Warren Buffet made headlines when he said that he wasn't paying enough in taxes. While this statement made the GOP want to gag, it really highlighted an ugly truth about our current political system - The rich get richer while the poor get taken advantage of. But what if the super-rich people like Warren Buffet and George Soros and Ted Turner all came together to create a better society where the wealthy actually did their part to help the rest of the country? That's exactly the kind of society that Ralph Nader has created in his new book "Only the Super Rich Can Save Us," and Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. interviewed him recently for Ring of Fire about this new political work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Echo In Light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-01-09 10:08 AM
Response to Original message
1. Thanks for posting
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProgressOnTheMove Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-01-09 11:05 AM
Response to Original message
2. It is in the intrest of a lot of wealthy people to break down monopolies that take wealth from ...
Edited on Tue Dec-01-09 11:08 AM by ProgressOnTheMove
society in doing so and from other industries, at least some wealthy folks that is. It has to be a fairer playing field for everyone. The more corporations consolidate the less there is for everyone as they don't need to compete or charge fair.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
woodcarver Donating Member (10 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-01-09 11:18 AM
Response to Original message
3. The single most important thing in preserving...
...our democracy is publicly financed election - without which, the wealthy and corporate interest will usurp more and more power from "We the People". We also need to rid ourselves of the fiction that corporations have the same status as people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dotymed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-01-09 11:42 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. Woodcarver,
That is the most pressing political change that can save our democracy. We would not have most of these other problems, ie..economic- regulate the financial industry so that it works for, not against the majority, health care for all- profit is the major hurdle, war- military industrial complex....all of these industries and many more (pharma, energy, etc..) own and control our political process. If we had public only, financed political system, then the greed would not dictate law. Also, corporations should only be considered "persons" if they are considered to be psychopaths, because a person with a corporate mentality would possess all of the qualities of a psychopath.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Go2Peace Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-01-09 11:31 AM
Response to Original message
4. If only, parlamentary systems are superior and allow more than two parties
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dtotire Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-01-09 11:51 AM
Response to Original message
6. Without Proportional Representation
A parliamentary system would not work. We would have to amend the Constitution get a logical proportional representation system enacted. Without one, a third party on the ballot would only get the worst candidates elected.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Better Believe It Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-01-09 12:14 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. So the "worst" candidate in 1992 was Clinton when Perot's Reform Party was on the ballot?

"a third party on the ballot would only get the worst candidates elected."

Without Ross Perot running and getting millions of votes it's likely that Clinton would not have been elected in 1992.

Most of Perot's voters were conservatives or registered Republicans who would have voted for Bush absent Perot's campaign.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jack Rabbit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-01-09 03:17 PM
Response to Original message
8. This is one of my favorite causes, but Mr. Nader needs to be corrected on one point . . .
The American Prime Minister will take questions. The President will be a ceremonial figure who greatest responsibility will be finding lost puppies in Yellowstone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
irislake Donating Member (967 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-01-09 03:31 PM
Response to Original message
9. But -- but -- but -- I thought that
your country had the best and greatest everything and that you are a beacon of light and freedom to the rest of us poor idiots.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 12:09 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Political Videos Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC