3. Senator Whitehouse is implying, without saying it, that Roe v Wade is next.
That's the clear implication of his description of the court's reasoning: because they are deeply divided, that's reason enough to overturn precedent. Is impeachment really off the table? If they do overturn Roe v Wade, will impeachment be an option?
We have another case of an intelligent, articulate individual. Everything he said is so valid .... buuuuut, what we need is action. Enough talk let's move on creating an amendment or whatever piece paper we need to reverse this action.:fistbump"
gives one the feeling they are listening to a preview to one of the Godfather movies. I would believe this is prosecutable under the RICO Act. I don't see too much difference in what the Mob has done since the early 1900's and what government has become ?
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.