Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

TYT: Oil Spill Kills Obama Energy Bill (According To Senator It's 'DOA')

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Political Videos Donate to DU
 
ihavenobias Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-01-10 11:32 AM
Original message
TYT: Oil Spill Kills Obama Energy Bill (According To Senator It's 'DOA')
Edited on Sat May-01-10 11:34 AM by ihavenobias
 
Run time: 03:53
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wP-pCzILmbk
 
Posted on YouTube: May 01, 2010
By YouTube Member: TheYoungTurks
Views on YouTube: 4813
 
Posted on DU: May 01, 2010
By DU Member: ihavenobias
Views on DU: 1355
 
Summary: Cenk talks about how the oil spill disaster led Senator Nelson to say the energy bill is 'Dead On Arrival' (two NJ Senators are also opposing any plan with offshore drilling). Also, the ONE Republican that claimed he might support it (Lindsey Graham) is using immigration as an excuse to bail. You can http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/04/30/bill-nelson-energy-bill-w_n_558465.html|read more here>. Finally, Cenk explains how corporate America wins.

PS---The Guardian wrote a great article about TYT that includes which Senator refuses to be interviewed by Cenk again and more!

http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2010/apr/26/cenk-uygur-young-turks|Guardian Article (Which Senator Blacklisted TYT?) >.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-01-10 11:51 AM
Response to Original message
1. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
szatmar666 Donating Member (532 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-01-10 11:58 AM
Response to Original message
2. Someone PLEASE wake Cenk UP!
the healthcare bill is LAW! It went through! Since when is a bill DOA just because it will have to change during the process?! It's not even written yet, Cenk! How can it be dead?!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lorien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-01-10 12:15 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Cenk isn't the one who needs to be woken up. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
szatmar666 Donating Member (532 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-01-10 12:15 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. that's a logical answer
NOT!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ihavenobias Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-01-10 12:18 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Response
Edited on Sat May-01-10 12:19 PM by ihavenobias
For healthcare, it's not that 'something' passed, it's a question of how good (or bad) the final product is.

Even the strongest supporters of the bill conceded it has major flaws (many of which exist because of countless and unnecessary concessions to a party that was NEVER going to support it regardless). Critics (http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x7933996|myself included>) warned that leaving the private insurance industry as strong as ever would mean that outrageous premiums wouldn't decrease. The fact that they're scrambling after the fact to http://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/21/health/policy/21health.html?ref=todayspaper|push something through to control costs> is absurd, since access to affordable care was supposed to the point of the bill.

The pre-emptive offshore oil drilling concession was hailed as a masterstroke by some but we see quite clearly now it wasn't so masterful. And by the way, don't worry about waking up Cenk, worry about the Senators discussed in the video and article I linked to. They're the ones who actually get to vote on legislation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
szatmar666 Donating Member (532 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-01-10 01:26 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. The healthcare bill barely squeaked through
by about 3 or 4 votes in the House. You like it or not it was either this or nothing, ie. a defeat for democrats and Obama. Now, if you don't like it, you should do everything in your power to put in more democrats and more progressives in Congress, especially because this is a redistricting year and elections will have a decade long consequences on bills of all sorts.

I remember Cenk at Air America, he always sounded like a libertarian, now everybody seems to think he is a progressive, whatever. I just point out the fact that it's bat shit crazy to call a bill dead before it's written, ok?! can we at least agree on the "sky is blue" level of basic reality here?! Or that's just too much for Cenk fans....

About offshore oil drilling: it aint over till it's over.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ihavenobias Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-01-10 01:47 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. In the comment you responded to
there's a link to my blog about the worst case scenario on healthcare reform. I'd say you should read it to understand my position but I'm not sure it matters.

TYT on Air America was quite a while ago so that couldn't be less relevant, might as well say Huffington Post is right wing because Arianna was a Republican a decade ago (or that Kucinich can't be trusted on choice issues because he used to be 'pro-life'). And again, Cenk is just reporting the story, he didn't write it. Can we at least agree that it was a Dem Senator that said the bill is DOA? And that two Senators in NJ are refusing to sign on to anything with offshore drilling, that the one (R) who was supposed to back the plan is backing out and that in conclusion, the offshore drilling pre-emptive concession was a flop and not a "masterstroke" game of chess?

You know, it's a "sky is blue" sort of thing. ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
szatmar666 Donating Member (532 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-01-10 02:00 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. how many democrats declared they will not sign the healthcare bill?!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CherylK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-01-10 02:15 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. +1
:toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
szatmar666 Donating Member (532 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-01-10 02:27 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. what is your solution?!
Edited on Sat May-01-10 02:29 PM by szatmar666
Other than dissing your president and your party, do you have a plausible idea?! this is what happened in the 90s too: people threw the democrats under the bus, they didn't offer any popular support or positive ideas and we ended up where we did because of that. I am sad to conclude this, but as a european american (meaning I was actually born there and not that I am white) I am disappointed at both the left and the right in this country. It seems to me that both sides offer arcane metaphysical arguments akin to "how many angels can stand on the head of a pin" and no pragmatism at all. I am now watching the debates on derivatives going all the way back to 1994-1995. It's astonishing how little support progressives got in the media and from the public while their fate was decided by corporations. Most of this stuff that's destroying families today was decided at the ballot box in 1994 and not with the Glass Steagall in 2000. It was decided because Clinton failed to close the deal on health care.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ihavenobias Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-01-10 02:32 PM
Response to Reply #12
15. Dissing the strategy
Big difference. I care a hell of a lot more about ideas than individuals. I'm not for or against something simply because of the letter next to a name. That's the mistake Republicans made for years with Bush, and the few sensible ones that spoke out got the same in-party anger and backlash. We shouldn't be making that mistake.

The solution is not to make costly concessions unnecessarily when it's incredibly obvious that the Republicans will NOT support anything this administration or party does.

The End
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theFrankFactor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-02-10 09:24 AM
Response to Reply #15
19. Precisely Tom! To some go-along-to-get-along is the principal of choice...
Edited on Sun May-02-10 09:25 AM by theFrankFactor
A strong and effective leader Obama is not. We have droves of "Democrats" just so giddy that he's left of Dick Cheney they get all pissy when you point out what a pussy Barack has been. Hey we got "a" "bill" !!!! Wow! If you have to explain to these dupes what happened to single payer and with pharma and their holy man, Barack you might as well forget it. It won't matter. Get in line behind ze pahty!

Fuck off!

Let's get off this short bus Democrat pride.

Off shore drilling - BIG FUCKING MISTAKE! SHOULD NEVER BE SUPPORTED!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
szatmar666 Donating Member (532 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-02-10 09:46 AM
Response to Reply #19
20. I never said "go along"
If you want your president to be more progressive, push the country and the party to the left, and please stop whining while you pretend you are some kind of righteous rebel or misunderstood prophet of our time, it's pathetic!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HZLlnF1rJGE
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JoeyT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-01-10 02:34 PM
Response to Reply #12
16. While I'd agree this is exactly what happened in the 90s
your recollection of it is a bit odd.
What I remember is people constantly demanding liberals support policies they hated because liberal policies were just around the corner. That line only works for so long.

Liberals get no support from the media because we're considered fringe. It doesn't help that our party helps to push that line whenever they get the chance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OhioChick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-01-10 02:28 PM
Response to Reply #9
13. +1 n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GOTV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-03-10 03:05 PM
Response to Reply #7
21. He's hardly a libertarian - he calls for more regulations in almost all sectors
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GOTV Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-03-10 03:07 PM
Response to Reply #2
22. I think Cenk is right - and right frequently
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LiberalLovinLug Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-01-10 01:03 PM
Response to Original message
6. What if....?
..Obama had stuck to his campaign promises. His "liberal" campaign promises about protecting the shores by not allowing off shore drilling?

The shrill screaming by Palin, Hannity, Limpballs and others would have reached a frenzied level in the days leading up to the oil spill. And then after the spill, the silence would be even more deadening than it is today. His "I told you so" wouldn't have to be said out loud, but its truth would be ear shattering.

The Democrats now have to own part of that devastating spill. Which binds their hands. Just like the Iraq war authority bill, the Repubs will now deflect criticism of their support for off-shore drilling by exclaiming "Both parties wanted it"

Off shore oil drilling would not have been in a bill that the pre-election Obama was willing to sign. That bill would not be in danger of losing support.

Obama makes it twice as hard on himself with this 'trying to please everyone but pleasing no one' way of working.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
20score Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-01-10 01:37 PM
Response to Original message
8. K&R!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Capitalocracy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-01-10 02:30 PM
Response to Original message
14. Offshore drilling really needs to be eliminated
Edited on Sat May-01-10 02:30 PM by Capitalocracy
But after the short-term political fallout from this disaster subsides (which will probably happen before they've even blocked the flow of oil), in the end offshore drilling will probably end up continuing to increase. Obama's all of the above approach was just as bad when it was McCain's campaign platform as it is now, but now it looks even worse because we're seeing the devastating consequences of offshore drilling. Yeah I know, Obama's the chessmaster, but I think we're allowed to be disappointed and distraught. That doesn't mean we have to stop fighting or let the Republicans win, but what's the point of having a Democrat in office if we're unwilling to pressure him politically and just let the Republicans do all the pressuring for us?

K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sulphurdunn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-01-10 02:43 PM
Response to Original message
17. DOA
Exxon Valdez, Chernobyl, Three Mile Island, Great Barrier Reef Spill, Deep Water Horizon Spill, etc. etc. etc. Human error will eventually negate any fail-safe systems that does not fail on its own.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kajsa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-01-10 05:35 PM
Response to Original message
18. K&R!
This is the first bit of good news I've heard in
a while.

( outside of the Laker win last night)

:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 01:22 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Political Videos Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC