Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Democracy Now: Fallujah Cancer, Infant Mortality Rates Soar in Fallujah 'Similar to Hiroshima'

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Political Videos Donate to DU
 
Hissyspit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-26-10 08:05 PM
Original message
Democracy Now: Fallujah Cancer, Infant Mortality Rates Soar in Fallujah 'Similar to Hiroshima'
 
Run time: 00:39
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wxFAXUUpBK8
 
Posted on YouTube: July 26, 2010
By YouTube Member: StartLoving3
Views on YouTube: 50
 
Posted on DU: July 27, 2010
By DU Member: Hissyspit
Views on DU: 1145
 
StartLoving3 | July 26, 2010
Cancer & Infant Mortality Rates Soar in Fallujah

"In news from Iraq, The Independent of London reports a new medical study has found dramatic increases in infant mortality, cancer and leukemia in the Iraqi city of Fallujah, which was bombarded by US Marines in 2004. There has been a four-fold increase in all cancers and a twelve-fold increase in cancer in children under the age of fourteen. Infant mortality in the city is more than four times higher than in neighboring Jordan and eight times higher than in Kuwait. The report says that the types of cancer are 'similar to that in the Hiroshima survivors who were exposed to ionizing radiation from the bomb and uranium in the fallout.'"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
JohnyCanuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-26-10 08:53 PM
Response to Original message
1. Increases in childhood cancer and leukemia in Fallujah
Sounds sort of like what happened in Basra after the US military dumped a shitload of the US nuclear industry's waste by-product, depleted uranium, on the surrounding Southern Iraqi countryside in Gulf War 1. You have to admit it is a pretty creative way to get rid of a waste product you'd normally have to spend money to store, safeguard or dispose of in an environmentally sound method if it was kept in the USA. It's so much easier and more cost-effective just to give it free of charge to the Pentagon who can then have their good buddies in the military-industrial complex's ammo plants dispose of it for you gratis by fashioning it into bullets and bombs to be later exploded into toxic uranium oxide dust in other peoples' countries around the other side of the world.


The Health Effects of DU Weapons in Iraq
by Thomas Fasy MD PhD

Dr. Fasy is an Associate Clinical Professor of Pathology at the Mount Sinai School of Medicine in New York City. He has longstanding interests in carcinogenesis and environmental toxicology. In the past two years, he has lectured at conferences and university campuses on the toxic effects of inhaling uranium oxide dusts derived from depleted uranium weapons.

snip

Soil particles contain uranium at very low concentrations, typically less than 5 parts per million; the vast majority of these soil particles, however, are too large to be inhaled deep into the lungs. In contrast, the dust particles derived from depleted uranium weapons contain very high concentrations of uranium, typically more than 500.000 parts per million; moreover, most of the D.U. dust particles are sufficiently small to be inhaled deep into the lungs. Thus, compared to the uranium naturally present in the environment, D.U. dust contains uranium in a form that is vastly more bio-available and more readily internalized.

Uranyl ions bind to DNA; they bind in the minor groove of DNA. While bound to DNA, uranyl ions are chemically reactive and can give rise to free radicals which may damage DNA. Chemically mediated DNA damage of this type may contribute to the ability of uranium to induce cancers.

I would now like to present some epidemiologic data from the Basra governate in the south of Iraq. In February 1991, more than 300 tons (possibly much more than 300 tons) of D.U. weapons were used in South of Iraq. After 5-6 year latent periods, increases in childhood cancers and birth defects were documented in the Basra governate. The most recent data indicate a four fold increase in pediatric malignancies and a seven fold increase in congenital malformations compared to 1990, the year preceeding the war.

snip

When we look at charts and graphs of leukemia cases, we can easily lose sight of the anguish that leukemia represents for each child and his or her family. So I will close by presenting the story of Atarid, a five year old boy in Baghdad. This poignant photo was taken by Cathy Breen, a nurse from New York with Voices in the Wilderness. The photo was taken in mid-March 2003, a few days before the bombing of Baghdad began. Atarid was in hospital for treatment of his leukemia; his mother, Adra, has just been notified that all cancer patients in the hospital will be sent home to make room for the expected casualties from the iminent bombing. At the end of March 2003, Atarid died at home of septicemia, a blood infection. It is not possible to establish a direct cause and effect relationship between the contamination of many populated areas of Iraq with uranium oxide dust from depleted uranium weapons and the increased incidence of cancers, leukemia and birth defects in Iraq.

Nonetheless, uranium is a known carcinogen and a known inducer of birth defects. Consequently, its dispersal into the environment in a form that is so readily internalized, is at the very least, profoundly reckless.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=104&topic_id=4124449



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtheistCrusader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-26-10 11:22 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Lots of uses for it.
Like casings for warheads on re-entry. Tough stuff. Interesting properties.

Should never be used on anything that isn't an armored target, like a Tank though. What the fuck are they shooting at houses with it for?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProudLib56 Donating Member (15 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-27-10 10:03 AM
Response to Reply #2
8. because
they have no regard for human life
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kalun D Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-27-10 12:46 AM
Response to Reply #1
5. Gulf War Syndrome
over 10,000 solders from the first gulf war are already dead at an early age

and this 2nd gulf war has used magnitudes more D.U.

buddy of mine was on a tank crew of 4, the other 3 have been dead for 10 years

he was the only one of the 4 that drank water through the gas mask tube instead of lifting the mask to drink.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lovuian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-26-10 11:31 PM
Response to Original message
3. we have said depleted uranium as well as other
what I call small nukes

and now Iraq is going through genocide
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
midnight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-27-10 12:16 AM
Response to Original message
4. Could we just leave them alone.
Come home, and make peace already.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PDJane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-27-10 01:46 AM
Response to Original message
6. The US was aware, and has been aware for a long time,
What the effects of depleted uranium would be, and used it anyway.

Please note, however, that the stuff doesn't stay where one puts it. Soldiers bring it home on their persons, the stuff blows around in wind and sand, and it contaminates everything.

The entire world will experience an increase in cancers and birth defects from this stuff. I would also note that low level radiation on a continuous basis is more damaging that one large exposure, since the DNA gets no time to heal itself, and is worse for boys because they have the xy chromosome instead of the more stable xx chromosome.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnyCanuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-27-10 07:40 AM
Response to Original message
7. NZ Herald: Secret toll of uranium weapons
Apologists for the use of DU weaponry will tell you that DU weapons are not a problem because the main form of radiation given off by DU is relatively low energy alpha particles, and these alpha particles are easily blocked from entering the body by clothing. It is said that even the very thin layer of dead skin cells we all have on the surface of the skin is enough to deflect alpha particles from penetrating the body.

However, the problem with DU weaponry is that when the DU hits the target it DU burns and produces a shower of microsopic particles of uranium oxide which can then remain suspended in the air long enough to be blown around and inhaled through the lungs. Once inside the lungs these particles can pass through the lung blood barrier to get deposited in various parts of the body including the bone marrow, reproductive organs, brain etc. Once lodged in the soft tissue of the body the alpha particle radiation becomes much more dangerous as it can now easily cause DNA damage to neighboring cells. In addition if the radiation hazards are not enough, uranium as a heavy metal (independent of the radiological hazard) also has extremely toxic and damaging effects on human cells.

.

It is 50 years since Tony Ciarfello and his friends used the yard of a depleted uranium weapons factory as their playground in Colonie, a suburb of Albany in upstate New York.

"Inside was a big open ground, and nobody would chase us away," remembers Ciarfello.

"We used to play baseball and hang by the stream running through it. We even used to fish in it - though we noticed the fish had big pink lumps on them."

Now Ciarfello has lumps on his chest - strange, round tumours that protrude 2 cm.

snip

The US Government and the firm that ran the factory, National Lead (NL) Industries, have for decades been assuring former workers and residents around the 7 ha site that, although it is true that the plant used to produce unacceptable levels of radioactive pollution, it was not a serious health hazard.

Now, in a development with potentially devastating implications not only for Colonie but also for the future use of some of the West's most powerful weapon systems, that claim is being challenged. In a paper to be published in the scientific journal Science of the Total Environment, a team led by Professor Randall Parrish of Leicester University in northern England reports the results of a three-year study of Colonie, paid for by Britain's Ministry of Defence.

Parrish's team has found that depleted uranium (DU) contamination, which remains radioactive for millions of years, is, in effect, impossible to eradicate from the environment or from the bodies of humans.

snip

The Army Corps clean-up team tested the soil from some of the gardens of houses backing on to the plant, and in cases where it was found to be emitting more than 35 pico curies of radiation per gram, they removed it.

The researchers discovered dust in and around buildings emitting up to 10 times as much. DU, inhaled in the form of tiny motes of oxide that lodge inside the lungs, emits alpha radiation, nuclei of helium. Unlike the gamma radiation produced by enriched, weapons-grade uranium, alpha particles will not penetrate the skin.

But inside the body, DU travels around the bloodstream, accumulating in the lungs and in other soft tissues such as the brain and bone marrow. There, each mote becomes an alpha particle hotspot, bombarding its locality and damaging cell DNA. Research has shown that DU has the potential to cause a wide range of cancers, kidney and thyroid problems, birth defects and disorders of the immune system.
(emphasis added /JC)

http://www.nzherald.co.nz/world/news/article.cfm?c_id=2&objectid=10477996&ref=rss


Uranium’s Effect On DNA Established

The use of depleted uranium in munitions and weaponry is likely to come under intense scrutiny now that new research that found that uranium can bind to human DNA. The finding will likely have far-reaching implications for returned soldiers, civilians living in what were once war-zones and people who might live near uranium mines or processing facilities.

Uranium - when manifested as a radioactive metal - has profound and debilitating effects on human DNA. These radioactive effects have been well understood for decades, but there has been considerable debate and little agreement concerning the possible health risks associated with low-grade uranium ore (yellowcake) and depleted uranium.

Now however, Northern Arizona University biochemist Diane Stearns has established that when cells are exposed to uranium, the uranium binds to DNA and the cells acquire mutations, triggering a whole slew of protein replication errors, some of which can lead to various cancers. Stearns' research, published in the journals Mutagenesis and Molecular Carcinogenesis, confirms what many have suspected for some time - that uranium can damage DNA as a heavy metal, independently of its radioactive properties. "Essentially, if you get a heavy metal stuck on DNA, you can get a mutation," Stearns explained. While other heavy metals are known to bind to DNA, Stearns and her team were the first to identify this characteristic with uranium.

http://www.scienceagogo.com/news/20060307010324data_trunc_sys.shtml
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnyCanuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-29-10 04:34 PM
Response to Original message
9. The Suffering of Fallujah
The International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health has just published an epidemiological study, "Cancer, Infant Mortality and Birth Sex-Ratio in Fallujah, Iraq 2005-2009," which has found, among much else, that Fallujah is experiencing higher rates of cancer, leukemia and infant mortality than Hiroshima and Nagasaki did in 1945.

Perhaps most eerily, the study, conducted by a team of 11 researchers this past January and February, in 711 households, found a radical shift in the ratio of female-to-male births. Under normal circumstances, the human constant is approximately 1,050 boys born for every 1,000 girls. In post-invasion Fallujah, 860 boys have been born for every 1,000 girls -- similar to a shift seen in Hiroshima after the atom bomb was dropped.

Dr. Chris Busby, one of the study's authors, said only "some very major mutagenic exposure" could account for such an aberration. The most likely culprit, he said, is depleted uranium, a dense metal with extraordinary penetrating ability used in the manufacture of missiles, shells and bombs. DU explodes on impact into an extremely fine, radioactive dust that settles on the ground or is carried by the wind. While the U.S. military continues to deny that breathing it is harmful, many scientists insist that it is highly toxic and a likely contributor to Gulf War Syndrome -- that it is, in short, a nuclear weapon, with fallout as dangerous as a nuclear bomb.

To read about this is to grow increasingly sickened and disturbed at who we are and what we are doing: still debating "the war," still dignifying this ongoing hemorrhage of national values with the term; still murdering civilians in Afghanistan and Pakistan, and resolutely fleeing from any responsibility for the ecocide we have committed in Iraq; and still silently, inevitably, preparing for the next one.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/robert-koehler/the-suffering-of-fallujah_b_663545.html

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 11:30 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Political Videos Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC