Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Rachel Maddow - Spent Nuclear Rods segment - Tuesday, March 15th

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Political Videos Donate to DU
 
Tx4obama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-11 12:41 AM
Original message
Rachel Maddow - Spent Nuclear Rods segment - Tuesday, March 15th
Edited on Wed Mar-16-11 12:43 AM by Tx4obama
 
Run time: 15:14
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RiXIODVlfXk
 
Posted on YouTube: March 16, 2011
By YouTube Member: MOXNEWSd0tCOM
Views on YouTube: 301
 
Posted on DU: March 16, 2011
By DU Member: Tx4obama
Views on DU: 1498
 

And here is a link to Maddow's March 14th segment:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=385x563376

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Tx4obama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-11 01:13 AM
Response to Original message
1. Regarding the 'spent rods', seems like after 9/11 they'd have done something about this
Having the spent rod pools located in the 'top' of the buildings is a disaster waiting to happen here in the USA !!!


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dencol Donating Member (297 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-11 04:48 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Such a modification would cost money.
Edited on Wed Mar-16-11 04:49 AM by dencol
Money corporations are not going to spend. It's far better to take the risk and let the public deal with the costs when everything goes to hell... at least from a capitalistic point of view where the most successful companies are those who can most efficiently externalize costs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chervilant Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-11 03:53 PM
Response to Reply #1
8. hmm....
I think it's time for you to read "No Nukes" by Anna Gyorgy and Friends, or any number of well-researched anti-nuke books or articles. The nuclear power industry has been "storing" spent fuel rods at various nuclear reactors throughout the US (the WORLD), as a 'temporary' measure (which means--in actuality--for several years), since no long-term containment or storage has been created ("Yucca Mountain," notwithstanding). Long-term storage is now and will continue to be the most expensive aspect of nuclear energy, and one about which we seldom hear accurate information.

Furthermore, we are seldom told when nuclear waste is transported from place to place, and we're seldom made aware when accidents happen to vehicles transporting nuclear waste. The Corporate Megalomaniacs who've made vast fortunes on nuclear power want us to be good little mushrooms--in the dark and fed lots of bullshit.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pam4water Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-11 06:13 AM
Response to Original message
3. They should have build a robot to do maintenance on nuclear.
Edited on Wed Mar-16-11 06:13 AM by pam4water
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JJW Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-11 07:48 AM
Response to Original message
4. Know one should pretend
fire engine pumps can cool down the six reactors. Ignore the lies, and prepare for total melt down.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tx4obama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-11 02:52 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. I agree. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bongbong Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-11 11:15 AM
Response to Original message
5. Oxidation = rusting
They are the same thing. The layman's term "rust" refers to Fe²O³, which is what you get when you let iron (Fe) be exposed to air for any length of time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fumesucker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-11 03:15 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Yeah, but in this case it's zirconium the tubes are made from..
I think "rust" per se is limited to when iron gets friendly with oxygen.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bongbong Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-16-11 03:58 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. Depends on the chemist
My father would use the term rust as a substitute for the verb "oxidation" if he was in a hurry. I heard other chemists use it too...but you're right, technically the term "rust" as a noun is reserved for ferric oxide.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 05:27 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Political Videos Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC