Edwards: stop this president from moving forward on Iran

Run time: 01:26 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dD_Ou_Qiqwo   Posted on YouTube: November 16, 2007 By YouTube Member: Views on YouTube: 0   Posted on DU: November 16, 2007 By DU Member: be inspired Views on DU: 1468

 
Here's a great clip from tonight's debate. Edwards was on point with all the questions he was asked. He answered them brilliantly. With less time given to him than some of the other candidates, I still think he won the debate.

for Edwards tonight. Laid it out straight.

NO MORE WAR!

Being he helped start the last war, I'm glad he's trying to stop the next.

voting for the Kyl/Lieberman resolution was a mistake -- you don't hand a bully a club and believe he won't use it. Edwards knows not to trust Bush/Cheney, Clinton still hasn't learned.

I feel our House and Senate had to know about PNAC and their plan for world domination through aggression. Anyone who voted yes to the IWR should not be our president.

I disagree with you though. I believe that learning and growing and taking responsibility for one's actions are very important aspects of a mature individual. I see that in Edwards; I don't see that in Clinton. I also believe that there are times for reconciliation and times for cleaning up the mess. That's why I support Edwards over Obama.

"Sorry" doesn't cut it for me. We have too many really good democrates that should be in our "top three", namely, Kucinich, Biden and Dodd. The three of them did very good tonight. They didn't just tell us what they thought we wanted to hear.

Once again, Kucinich attacked Edwards - the most viable Progressive candidate and closest to him on the issues. I've lost respect for Kucinich and sorry I wasted my vote on him in 2004. Kucinich campaign helps Hillary.

Every time he talks about the idiots who enable Bush, he’s talking about Hillary. Maybe Kucinich goes after Edwards because Edwards runs as if he’s a man of the people, -“son of a mill worker” (can’t get tired of that one).

Edwards is like Bush, Cheney, Giuliani and many other candidates who have connections with corporations or investment firms; we will never know for sure where Edwards allegiance lies.

Edwards leaving the senate and becoming a Senior Advisor to the Fortress Investment Group was a big turn off for me.

He was anti-choice before he began running for prez in 2003. NARAL nailed him on it - and he flip flopped real quick.

Kucinich campaign helps Hillary - by attacking Edwards who is closest to him on the issues.

And Kucinich has to know the Dems won't hold impeachment hearings while Bill is campaigning with Hillary. So his impeachment mantra is a ruse too.

To think, he’s a nice guy who’s against abortion (I don’t know many people who would say they’re pro-abortion). ....He’s against abortion, yet would never take away a woman’s right to choose. Sounds like a good democrat to me. ...On the other hand, using the term “flip-flopper” to take down a presidential candidate, sounds like a re:puke: to me.

way too much. and wasn't in command in stopping people from droning on and on, like Richardson, and Clinton at times. Biden didn't get enough time. Edwards for once didn't get as much as normal, but he got what he deserved, I think Biden continues to hit home runs in these debates.

John showed very calm resolve, and answered all of his questions well. I really didn't appreciate the only true mudslinging (as Sen Clinton enjoyed throwing the phrase at John tonight) of the night about John being a "trial lawyer", as if he should be blamed for China's faulty products because of his vote allowing them in, when it's up to the president to the gov't to monitor them, and therefore declare, either through the president asking the Congress to act, or the Congress doing it directly, in punishing China.

I think when you point out talking one answer one minute, then saying something totally different, that's not mudslinging, but Hillary seems to think so, or is that because she lost 5 points to John in Iowa this past week and she has to try out the "mudslinging" charge on him since she's now trailing Obama & Edwards quite possibly in Iowa?

I would like John to speak in the next debate whenever that is, about why he's the person he is today (again, as I think he did it in a debate way back) since he's constantly attacked for being this 'populist' candidate that he wasn't, they say, in 04. I remember him being one of the favorites in '04 and driving young people to be interested in politics. This time, that mantle goes to Barack more so, but still, if he talked about working in the poverty center and seeing how bad millions of people have it in this country, A LOT MORE than he does, it would resonate in a debate.

GO JOHN!

Hillary may lose the black vote to him if he gets to speak to them. The hall was packed with black people, maybe moreso than white, and they loved him.
He was talking populist then, and he is now too.
I dont see that he has changed which they keep claiming.

And I dont see Hillary has changed. She's a globalist and a warmonger and so has Obama voted the same way she has.

Edwards, Biden and hope they can fit Kucinich in some place.

Edwards did answer brilliantly! I personally thought the debate format sucked, and Wolfe was an idiot. What was up with the diamonds vs. pearls question? Bleck!

K&R!!

Of course, the whole declaration as a terrorist group...and proliferates of WMDs vote was utter stupidity.

Here's an idea--if you really want to stop these fucking idiots from even more destruction of our security, economy, and constitution (and, what the hell, even take the fucking lead as a Democratic candidate)--then support the FUCKING IMPEACHMENT!

Otherwise what's the point, Emperor PissyPants will continue to piss all over Congress and the public by either vetoing, or if a veto is actually overridden, he'll simply sign another signing statement and continue to do whatever the fuck he wants.

I would like to vote for Edwards--what does he have to lose by speaking out for IMPEACHMENT?

Dems won't hold impeachment hearings while Bill is campaigning with Hillary. When will Kucinich get honest?

I am with Kucinch on this one