Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

ELENA KAGAN CONFIRMED TO THE U.S. SUPREME COURT.... The Senate this afternoon confirmed Elena Kagan

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » DU Groups » Democrats » Barack Obama Group Donate to DU
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-10 09:56 PM
Original message
ELENA KAGAN CONFIRMED TO THE U.S. SUPREME COURT.... The Senate this afternoon confirmed Elena Kagan
"The Senate this afternoon confirmed Elena Kagan's Supreme Court nomination, and she will join the high court this fall as the institution's 112th justice.

The Senate today confirmed Elena Kagan to the U.S. Supreme Court, making her the fourth woman ever to serve as a justice.

The vote, which was likely senators' last order of business before a month-long recess, divided largely along party lines with 63 senators endorsing President Obama's second court pick and 37 opposed.

Kagan's ascension to the bench is expected to preserve the court's ideological balance following liberal Justice John Paul Stevens' retirement. It also marks the first time three female justices will sit on the high court at the same time.

One Democrat, Nebraska's Ben Nelson, broke ranks and voted with the minority, while five Republicans -- Collins, Graham, Gregg, Lugar, and Snowe -- voted in support of confirmation.

The vote comes nearly one year to the day after the Senate voted 68 to 31 to confirm Sonia Sotomayor, and in that vote, 9 of the Senate's 41 Republicans backed the president's nominee.

By modern standards, Justice Kagan's 63 confirmation votes isn't exactly an overwhelming display of support. Of the Supreme Court's nine current justices, 63 ranks fairly low -- Stevens (98), Kennedy (97), Scalia (98), Ginsburg (96), Breyer (87), Roberts (78), Sotomayor (68) had more, while only Thomas (52) and Alito (58) had fewer.

As for the politics, I'm reminded of something Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) said two years ago about the Senate and high court nominees: "When President Bill Clinton nominated Stephen Breyer and Ruth Bader Ginsberg to serve on the high court, I voted for their confirmation, as did all but a few of my fellow Republicans. Why? For the simple reason that the nominees were qualified, and it would have been petty, and partisan, and disingenuous to insist otherwise. Those nominees represented the considered judgment of the president of the United States. And under our Constitution, it is the president's call to make."

In the last 12 months, McCain voted against Sotomayor and Kagan.


—Steve Benen 4:10 PM Permalink | Trackbacks | Comments (12)
http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/archives/individual/2010_08/025069.php#1809381

Consider the source of those who didn't support her..it's a badge of honor.
Refresh | 0 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
quiet.american Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-05-10 11:53 PM
Response to Original message
1. Did you see McCain immediately after this vote going on a tirade about - I don't know what.
The guy looked like a hyperventilating squirrel. For about 15 minutes, Carl Levin was batting back the crazy from McCain, and I've never seen Levin so animated. I thought he was going to go all Anthony Weiner on McCain.

The minute the Kagan vote concluded, McCain started in with some beef about something that apparently happened last year. It was so petty - McCain simply came across like someone who was trying to pee in the punchbowl. The punchbowl being the confirmation of Elena Kagan to the Supreme Court.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-06-10 12:08 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. No happily I missed that..but
Edited on Fri Aug-06-10 12:08 AM by Cha
thanks for getting the idiocy out there on the person who could have been the president except for millions of people like us. :patriot::patriot:

He's such a bitter ol' washed up caricature fueled by hate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
POAS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-06-10 01:13 PM
Response to Reply #1
8. "pee in the punch bowl"?
You talkin' 'bout Palin?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
firedupdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-06-10 01:30 AM
Response to Original message
3. Ben Nelson....he makes my blood boil. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
quiet.american Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-06-10 09:14 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. I second that emotion.
When I think of the phrase, "smug, back-stabbing bastard," an image of Ben Nelson comes to mind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Princess Turandot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-06-10 09:56 AM
Response to Original message
5. I still wonder what the President was thinking when he nominated her..
I mean, good God man, she's a METS fan. :D Given that AJ Sotomayor is now the country's most prominent Yankee fan, disaster may ensue. (After their photo op with the POTUS earlier this season, the Yankees actually took the 2009 World Series trophy to the Supreme Court, so Justice Sotomayor could have a private viewing!) Thank heavens inter-league play (when the Mets and Yankees meet during the regular season) is over.

Kagan went to the same NYC high school that I did, something I feel almost irrationally pleased with. If anyone could drive Clarence Thomas up and over the wall, it will be a Hunter girl!

As an aside, those vote stats seem to mirror the disintegration of the political process into partisanship.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-06-10 12:46 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Thanks for the lightheartedness!~
:D
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
POAS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-06-10 01:10 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. I demand that this
NY bias come to an end. The next appointee must be either a Red Sox or an Indians fan, two groups that have suffered mightily at the hands of the NY elitists for decades. We demand balance (and an end to the DH rule, but that is another story).
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-06-10 04:01 PM
Response to Original message
9. One third female!
So cool, can't wait to see their new photo all together!
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
quiet.american Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-06-10 11:53 PM
Response to Original message
10. Video of WH Reception held in Kagan's honor to celebrate her confirmation:
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-07-10 01:42 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. Thank you, q.a..I definetly want
see that vid!~
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Number23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-07-10 01:19 AM
Response to Original message
11. Between his Supreme Court noms and his Surgeon General nom
Obama seems to have pretty fantastic taste in the ladies. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Aug-07-10 01:43 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. President Obama has amazing taste and
understanding of the female persuasion. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 07:23 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » DU Groups » Democrats » Barack Obama Group Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC