Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

White House follows new path to secrecy

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
modrepub Donating Member (484 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-01-07 03:45 AM
Original message
White House follows new path to secrecy
Source: Associated Press

WASHINGTON - A newly disclosed effort to keep Vice President Dick Cheney's visitor records secret is the latest White House push to make sure the public doesn't learn who has been meeting with top officials in the Bush administration.

Over the past year, lawyers for President Bush and Cheney have directed the Secret Service to maintain the confidentiality of visitor entry and exit logs, declaring them to be presidential records, exempt from a law requiring their disclosure to whoever asks to see them.

The drive to keep the logs secret, the administration says, is essential to assuring that the president and vice president receive candid advice to carry out their duties.
<snip>

There was precedent for the demands.

During the Clinton administration, Republican-controlled congressional committees obtained Secret Service visitor logs while conducting investigations of the president and first lady.



Read more: http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070601/ap_on_go_pr_wh/bush_cheney_secrecy



When will this crap end!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ChicagoRonin Donating Member (250 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-01-07 03:59 AM
Response to Original message
1. Likely Secret Bush Administration Visitors
1) Sauron
2) Ernst Stavro Blofeld
3) Lex Luthor
4) Oil Company Executives
5) Cobra Commander
6) Big Tobacco Representatives
7) Jerry Falwell
8) Darth Vader
9) Nazguls and/or Blackwater associates
10) Dracula
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tesla Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-01-07 05:42 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Don't forget Jeffy!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
muriel_volestrangler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-01-07 02:46 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. Brilliant!
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
merwin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-01-07 04:57 AM
Response to Original message
2. This just confirms what we've known all along...
Cheney IS the president.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OneBlueSky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-01-07 10:38 AM
Response to Original message
4. "When will this crap end!" . . . when Congress gets off their fat lazy asses . . .
and puts a stop to it . . . thusfar they've done nothing but pontificate, cave, and enable . . .

seems that Congress' agenda is not that much different than BushCo's . . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eppur_se_muova Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-01-07 11:21 AM
Response to Original message
5. CNN Headline: "White House: Visitor logs exempt from laws"
http://www.cnn.com/2007/POLITICS/06/01/cheney.secrecy.ap/index.html

Exempt? Nice, huh?

If they need to receive 'candid' advice from someone whose name it would cause trouble to reveal, you have to wonder just what they are up to.

There is almost no chance such measures would ever be necessary to protect legitimate consultations. They are only needed to permit this maladministration to undermine democracy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nebenaube Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-01-07 03:25 PM
Response to Original message
7. Fine...
if that's the case add another violation of the Presidential Records Act (Hatch?)for routinely destroying the logs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pastiche423 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-01-07 03:49 PM
Response to Original message
8. Is "candid advice" the same as "unvarnished truth"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 09:50 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC