Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

BUSH Derails Attempts To End Illegal Wiretapping By NOT Providing Docs

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-05-07 06:21 AM
Original message
BUSH Derails Attempts To End Illegal Wiretapping By NOT Providing Docs
Bush derails attempts to end illegal wiretapping
Submitted by Canada IFP on Tue, 2007-06-05

President Bush derailed a bill by the US Congress aimed at ending the Administration's illegal wiretapping by not providing documents related to the President’s warrantless wiretapping program to the Senate Intelligence Committee that is currently reviewing the proposed legislation.

The US house of representatives last month passed the Intelligence Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008 bill with an amendment that makes Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978 (FISA) the only means by which domestic electronic surveillance for the purpose of gathering foreign intelligence information may be conducted.

The bill has been referred to the Senate Intelligence Committee, but the Committee is unable to proceed as the White House has repeatedly refused to hand over the relevant documents.

...............

Feingold accused the Administration of seeking broad new authorities unrelated to keeping FISA up-todate with new technology, and pursuing these authorities while refusing to rule out further surveillance activities entirely outside of the law.

"For more than four years, the Administration failed to inform the full congressional intelligence committees of the warrantless wiretapping program," said the Senator who cosponsored an ammendment by co-sponsor by Senator Feinstein to ensure that all members of the Committee receive, at a minimum, summary information about programs that the Administration has sought to limit to the Chairman and Vice Chairman. "In doing so, the Administration violated the National Security Act, which allows restricted notification to the “Gang of Eight” only in certain limited cases involving covert action."


more at:
http://pressesc.com/01181030757_bush_wiretapping_derail
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
salin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-05-07 06:27 AM
Response to Original message
1. two things....
1) Why does this reporting originate in Canada - and not in the US? Oh, thats right corporate media barely does "investigations" and original reporting on such matters.

2) Can't the Senate issue some sort of "contempt of congress" action against the WH? This is another example of Bushco trying to work as the sole govt actor by negating that congress has any power.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goclark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-05-07 06:32 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. BushHitler...it is a horror story
how can something like this happen in America with all the so called Media that is on 24 - 7?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Amonester Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-05-07 04:05 PM
Response to Reply #2
9. The so called Media (the major outlets) belong to 6 corporations...
Edited on Tue Jun-05-07 04:07 PM by Amonester
6 corporations rule.

6 corporations profit from their contributions to the Republiklan party.

6 corporations profit from the illegal invasion & occupation of a country that never ever attacked the USSA.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
williesgirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-05-07 03:09 PM
Response to Original message
3. They need to take the gloves off and go after the WH for these docs. recommended
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
On the Road Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-05-07 03:10 PM
Response to Original message
4. Anyone Know About Upcoming Hearings on the Wiretapping?
Could be in a closed session. Just curious. I hope the Senate is pursuing this with vigor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlackVelvet04 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-05-07 03:26 PM
Response to Original message
5. Isn't there some kind of legal ramification?
"In doing so, the Administration violated the National Security Act, which allows restricted notification to the “Gang of Eight” only in certain limited cases involving covert action."

They know the administration violated the National Security Act.....so isn't there some standard for punishment for violating that act? If not, what's the point in having the act, and if so why isn't it being pursued?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-05-07 03:45 PM
Response to Original message
6. Bush to Congress: "So?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rudy23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-05-07 03:54 PM
Response to Original message
7. Good thing we took impeachment off the table. Now our threats have no teeth whatsoever!
Bush "What are you going to do, write me a stern letter?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HCE SuiGeneris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-05-07 03:57 PM
Response to Original message
8. absolute power resting in the Executive branch... buh bye democracy
and no one to enforce the current laws...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Imagevision Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-05-07 11:03 PM
Response to Original message
10. Bush's positio seems to be, I'll dow whatever I want until someone stops me...?!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Trillo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-06-07 11:01 AM
Response to Original message
11. Perhaps in the future, in order to insure legislative body oversight
Edited on Wed Jun-06-07 11:02 AM by SimpleTrend
Executive Branch record keeping will need to be handled by some branch other than the Executive.

Otherwise, it's all outrage without substance unless impeachment occurs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 08:28 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC